Test Bed and Setup

Readers of our motherboard review section will have noted the trend in modern motherboards to implement a form of MultiCore Enhancement / Acceleration / Turbo (read our report here) on their motherboards. This does several things, including better benchmark results at stock settings (not entirely needed if overclocking is an end-user goal) at the expense of heat and temperature. It also gives in essence an automatic overclock which may be against what the user wants. Our testing methodology is ‘out-of-the-box’, with the latest public BIOS installed and XMP enabled, and thus subject to the whims of this feature. It is ultimately up to the motherboard manufacturer to take this risk – and manufacturers taking risks in the setup is something they do on every product (think C-state settings, USB priority, DPC Latency / monitoring priority, overriding memory sub-timings at JEDEC). Processor speed change is part of that risk, and ultimately if no overclocking is planned, some motherboards will affect how fast that shiny new processor goes and can be an important factor in the system build.

For reference, both the Asus Prime Z270-A and the GIGABYTE Z270X-Ultra Gaming had multi-core acceleration enabled by default. We tested the Asus Prime Z270-A with the 0604 BIOS and the GIGABYTE Z270X-Ultra Gaming with the F6 BIOS.

Test Setup
Processor Intel Core i7-7700K (ES, Retail Stepping), 91W, $340
4 Cores, 8 Threads, 4.2 GHz (4.5 GHz Turbo)
Motherboards Asus Prime Z270-A
GIGABYTE GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming
Cooling Alphacool Eisbaer 240
Power Supply Corsair AX1200i Platinum PSU
Memory G.Skill DDR4-2400 C15 2x16 GB 1.2V
Memory Settings XMP @ 2400
Video Cards MSI GTX 770 Lightning 2GB (1150/1202 Boost)
Hard Drive Crucial MX200 1TB
Case Open Test Bed
Operating System Windows 7 64-bit SP1

Many thanks to Alphacool, Corsair, G.Skill, MSI and Crucial for contributing to our test bed.

GIGABYTE Z270X Ultra Gaming BIOS & Software System Performance
Comments Locked

34 Comments

View All Comments

  • The_Assimilator - Thursday, July 20, 2017 - link

    TBH, it seems that unless you're looking to do some hardcore overclocking on the cheap, Gigabyte's board is the clear winner here in terms of features.
  • halcyon - Friday, July 21, 2017 - link

    This would have been an interesting review in... January, 6 months ago. Now it's a dead-end platform, everybody's waiting for Z370 late this year and Z390 early next year. Not to mention X299 and X399 mobo reviews.
  • Dug - Monday, July 24, 2017 - link

    Seeing how bad the x299 rollout is, I think you'll be waiting a lot longer than that for Z370, so this is very relevant for people that don't sit around and wait for the next best thing.
  • malireddyk - Monday, September 18, 2017 - link

    Doh!

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now