Adata PC4000

Click the image to view a larger picture.

Adata DDR500 is a very reasonably-priced DDR500, but somewhat difficult to find in the US market. It is readily available and widely used in many Asian markets. It was the only DDR500 tested in this roundup which was not supplied as a Dual-Channel kit. The DIMMs are packaged without heatspreaders, and labeled are assembled from blanks that carry an Adata ID.

The Adata performed well at DDR500, but our samples were some of the poorer overclockers in our DDR500 roundup.

Adata PC4000 — 2 x 512 MB Double-Bank
Speed Memory Timings & Voltage Quake3
fps
Sandra UNBuffered Sandra Standard Buffered Super PI 2M places (time in sec)
400DDR
800FSB
2.5-3-3-6
2.55V
326.47 INT 2655
FLT 2624
INT 4704
FLT 4745
133
500DDR
1000FSB
3-4-4-8
2.65V
394.37 INT 3143
FLT 3172
INT 5806
FLT 5905
107
518DDR
1036FSB
3-4-4-8
2.85V
408.60 INT 3459
FLT 3394
INT 6093
FLT 6111
103

The Candidates Corsair XMS4000
Comments Locked

77 Comments

View All Comments

  • Anonymous User - Wednesday, August 27, 2003 - link

    Okay... So I have the kingston ram, and I pulled it out to take a look at it... it has 4 chips on each side.. does that make it double sided or does that mean it's a single sided like the one in this article?
  • Wesley Fink - Wednesday, August 27, 2003 - link

    #2 -
    As I said in the review "You will have to decide if the increases in performance from using faster memory are worth the cost of that speedier memory. For some, these increases will matter a great deal, while for others, they will not be worth the cost."
  • Anonymous User - Wednesday, August 27, 2003 - link

    OCZ Rocks :-D
  • Anonymous User - Wednesday, August 27, 2003 - link

    #1, get a life, no one likes a blind haters. OCZ has proven themselves, I'm sorry your you feel your geek life has been threatened.

    Anyway, great review as always Wesley. Keep up the excellent work. :)
  • AgaBooga - Tuesday, August 26, 2003 - link

    I am currently reading the first page and I saw "Quake3 Demo FOUR.dm_66" and since I was first browsing it before reading it, I think it said "Quake FOUR!" But then, I went back since I was scrolling down quickly only to see it was Quack ;) 3, hehe.
  • Anonymous User - Tuesday, August 26, 2003 - link

    You have got to be kidding me. You're going to suggest that 6fps(at most) in UT2003 is worth spending double the price on RAM?
  • Anonymous User - Tuesday, August 26, 2003 - link

    Well I'm not going to bother reading the article, but I'll take a wild guess and say OCZ was declared the winner.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now