GIGABYTE has added its first Intel Apollo Lake-based desktop motherboard to its product list. The platform is designed primarily for low-power entry-level PCs, but the manufacturer decided to tailor its J3455N-D3H also for customers who need various legacy I/O technologies, indicating that this board was perhaps orignally designed for a specific customer but is now being released to the wider public. The mainboard is equipped with a host of older interfaces, including COM, LPT, PS/2, D-Sub and PCI.

Just like the name suggests, the GIGABYTE GA-J3455N-D3H is based on the the Intel Celeron J3455 processor (four Goldmont cores clocked at 1.5/2.3 GHz, 2 MB cache, dual-channel DRAM controller, HD Graphics 500, 10W TDP) that feature Intel’s ninth-generation graphics architecture (Gen9) as well as a refined media playback engine with hardware-accelerated playback of 4K video encoded using HEVC and VP9 codecs. The Mini-ITX motherboard is equipped with two DDR3L SO-DIMM slots (supporting up to 16 GB of DDR3L-1866), two Realtek GbE controllers, four SATA connectors (two controlled by the ASMedia ASM1061), one HDMI 1.4 output (up to 3840×2160 at 30 Hz), a connector for a TPM module, USB 3.0 headers (additional USB 2.0 ports are supported using the internal header and a Genesys Logic USB 2.0 hub) and so on.

In addition to the aforementioned regular I/O capabilities of a modern PC, the GIGABYTE GA-J3455N-D3H also features a number of legacy interfaces. The latter includes two COM ports, an LPT port header, PS/2 connectors for keyboard and mouse, a D-Sub output for displays, as well as a PCI slot for various add-on cards (and such cards may carry additional legacy interfaces, such as PATA, etc.). While the presence of the connectors makes the motherboard a viable candidate for a system running legacy applications, it should be noted that Intel’s Apollo Lake is not supported by Windows 7, 8, Vista or XP. Windows 10 does support legacy hardware, including COM, PCI and other interfaces, but the problem is those old software applications that use COM ports or PCI cards might not work in Windows 10, or require VMs and abstraction to do so. Therefore, to use them, one will need to install Windows 7 or XP on a virtual machine, which is not always convenient. Failing this, a Linux distribution might be a preferred option.

GIGABYTE's Intel Apollo Lake Motherboard
  GA-J3455N-D3H
CPU Intel Celeron J3455
4C/4T Goldmont
1.5 - 2.3 GHz
2MB cache
10 W TDP
Graphics HD Graphics 500
12 EUs
250 - 750 MHz
PCH Integrated into CPU
Memory 2 GB DDR3L-1866 pre-installed
Two SO-DIMM slots,
up to 16 GB of DDR3L-1866
Ethernet 2 × Realtek GbE controllers
Display Outputs D-Sub (implementation unclear)
HDMI 1.4
Storage 2 × SATA 6 Gbps (SoC)
2 × SATA 6 Gbps (ASM1061)
Audio Realtek ALC887
7.1 channel audio
USB 2 × USB 3.0 Type-A
2 × USB 2.0
Other I/O 2 × COM ports
LPT internal header
2 × PS/2
PCI
Form-Factor Mini-ITX
OS Windows 10
Detailed Specifications Link

While the GA-J3455N-D3H motherboard is heading to retail, the presence of two GbE ports indicates that GIGABYTE either plans to offer the platform to corporate customers, or is already shipping it to interested parties. If the latter is the case, it looks like GIGABYTE has clients who need more or less modern low-cost PCs with legacy interfaces in their corporate networks. It's always easier to replace a $500 PC connected to a $500k machine than to replace the machine, after all.

GIGABYTE has not announced MSRP of its J3455N-D3H motherboard or its actual release date. Keeping in mind that the COM, PS/2 and LPT controller, the additional SATA controller as well as a PCIe-to-PCI bridge all cost money, we expect GIGABYTE’s Apollo Lake-based platform to cost more than the base Apollo Lake solutions available.

Related Reading:

Source: GIGABYTE

POST A COMMENT

20 Comments

View All Comments

  • mode_13h - Friday, April 14, 2017 - link

    This is actually very common. Most companies put out press releases, large parts of which get copied & pasted into news feeds. In the case of reviews, the reviewers are often provided with sample text, images, etc. they can use, when pressed for time, etc.

    Not saying Anandtech doesn't write all their own content. I'm just saying I was surprised to learn just how much companies try to spoon feed journalists.
    Reply
  • abhaxus - Thursday, April 13, 2017 - link

    Looks like everything from that contributer is a blatant copy of AnandTech's front page.

    http://technewsdir.com/the-msi-gt83vr-titan-assess...
    Reply
  • cerberusss - Thursday, April 13, 2017 - link

    I'd love a motherboard from Gigabyte with just USB-C connections. Reply
  • cbm80 - Thursday, April 13, 2017 - link

    Why is Intel still on HDMI 1.4? Pathetic. Reply
  • mode_13h - Friday, April 14, 2017 - link

    Because it's low-end. They're trying to maintain differentiation between this and their Kaby Lake SKUs. Reply
  • cbm80 - Friday, April 14, 2017 - link

    Making products that suck because you don't want to compete with yourself...yeah, that always ends well. Reply
  • mode_13h - Friday, April 14, 2017 - link

    First, I now see that even the i7-7700K supports only HDMI 1.4. So, this isn't a case of market segmentation. And they do kinda suck for the lack of HDMI 2.0.

    However, I've gotta say, artificial market segmentation is like half of Intel's business model. However you feel about companies building products and then crippling them to sell into a lower market tier without cannibalizing their higher-margin offerings, Intel & many others have done quite well with this approach.
    Reply
  • Samus - Thursday, April 13, 2017 - link

    It's too bad such a board doesn't exist with an i5-6300U or something along the lines of a 15w CPU.

    The J3455 is still 10w, and comparatively slow for a 10w CPU. The U-series i5's are at least double the performance in single threaded tasks and at least double the performance in multithreaded tasks (while having half the physical cores) all the while using 5w more power.

    Like every ATOM, it's just too slow. It's substantially faster than the crap we had a decade ago, but not proportionately.
    Reply
  • zodiacfml - Thursday, April 13, 2017 - link

    It is because the i5 costs at least three times as the Atom. The Atom has a high TDP so that it has decent performance despite being small and less advanced. Reply
  • mode_13h - Friday, April 14, 2017 - link

    Most of the 10W TDP budget is probably for the GPU and dual-channel memory controller (which supports up to DDR3-1866). The GPU is a half-size, slightly down-clocked variant of the same architecture used in Skylake desktop CPUs.

    I'd imagine if you just run CPU benchmarks in text mode, the SoC probably wouldn't even reach 5W. But, I think we're getting a bit beyond ourselves, given the form factor. I'm hard-pressed to find a Mini-ITX case with a PSU < 60W.
    Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now