Except for the specifications, the EG651P was very similar to the EG465.  It came with the same glossy finish, copper sheathed ATX cable, and rear variable fan controller.

Click to Enlarge
Click to Enlarge

Undoubtedly, Enermax has the best power supply cable management capabilities available.  To combat interference, the ATX and +12V cables are copper meshed with rubber sheathing.  This copper shielding extends all the way into the power supply housing, where the rails are also shielded in copper.  It is no wonder why this power supply is also one of the heaviest.

This is the only other power supply in our review to display the ATX12V 1.2 compliance. For those of you not familiar, this is the published standard that assures stability with Intel and AMD systems. This particular standard makes sure the +3.3V rail is not neglected when increasing the wattage on the +12V rail, but also assures tight specifications on the lesser used -5VSB rail. We can see that the specifications on this unit are not skewed only to the +12V rail, so this unit does make sense for an AMD system builder as well.

Click to Enlarge
Click to Enlarge

Wattages

 

3.3V

5V

12V

-12

-5

+5vsb

combined theoretical

actual combined

advertised  total

Enermax EG651P-VE FMA 550W

118.80

180.00

432.00

12.00

5.00

11.00

298.80

200.00

550.00

Specifications alone speak volumes for this power supply.  The +12V rail has an advertised rating of 36A, or 432 watts.  This puts the EG651 way above any other non-Enermax component.  However, since mathematically the power supply can only sustain about 330watts on that rail, the advertised 432 is probably the peak output.  Even at 330W, the EG651 still towers over most power supplies. 

The EG651P-VE is one of the pricier units in our round up.  Most online retailers are carrying this unit for around $135, but with rebates and deals you might get it as low as $120.

We thank MaxPoint for rushing us the two Enermax power supplies to us before the deadline for this article.

Enermax EG465AX-VE FCA 460W TurboLink 420W
Comments Locked

70 Comments

View All Comments

  • Anonymous User - Friday, August 1, 2003 - link

    1. No amp measurements were listed, a serious deficiency because without them there is no way to know how well each PS met its amp specs, and many brands are known to fall short.

    2. No overload testing results for shorts, excessive power draw, excessive temperature.

    3. Ripple is not just slow voltage variation also short term variation, such as for each AC cycle (60 Hz for the incoming AC, about 60,000 Hz for the output DC). I would have liked to see how the latter correlated with the memory noise test results.

    4. I hope you were careful when you tested the PS heatsink temperatures because some heatsinks are live with high voltage.
  • Anonymous User - Thursday, July 31, 2003 - link

    Well for the observent people who can differentiate between orange and blue, its not an issue. Also waiting a full second before clicking it reveals the location on both the bottom left and the mouse cursor. but i can see how it does get annoying.
  • Anonymous User - Thursday, July 31, 2003 - link

    yeah those in page advertisements are REALLY annoying...those have got to go. i never know when i'm going to link to another anandtech article or to an ad...i guess that's the point but it's still unacceptable
  • Anonymous User - Thursday, July 31, 2003 - link

    I would like to see the review include a Heroichi Electronic power supply, I hear they are very good but I haven't used one.
  • Anonymous User - Thursday, July 31, 2003 - link

    Some of your "In Page Advertising" links seem to be missing closing links tags or something so that it results in having a <link> in the middle or end of a sentence. Ex. "We had a lot of troubles with Vantec’s last power supply, the Stealth. We found an error in the production label<link>, which quickly led to a change in all the labeling on all Stealth power supplies."
  • KristopherKubicki - Thursday, July 31, 2003 - link

    #3 and #4, thank you for spotting these errors. I have updated and fixed them.

    Cheers,

    Kristopher
  • Anonymous User - Thursday, July 31, 2003 - link

    I hope the ripple for the PC Power & Cooling 3V wasn't 2.295.. Possibly 3.296??? 1 volt drop is unacceptable.
  • Anonymous User - Thursday, July 31, 2003 - link

    The REAL price of the pc power&coolinghttp://www.directron.com/pcpower.html
  • Anonymous User - Thursday, July 31, 2003 - link

    a little more content per page in some cases would be nice too...

    ...but good to see content on the site at all...and seemingly more regularly too...
  • Anonymous User - Thursday, July 31, 2003 - link

    woah guys, the tables need some work...

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now