The text says "For our test, we take a 90-second clip of the Rise of the Tomb Raider benchmark running on a GTX 980 Ti at 1440p" but the graph heading says "System: FCAT Processing ROTR 1440p GTX1080 Data"
We’ve updated our terms. By continuing to use the site and/or by logging into your account, you agree to the Site’s updated Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
254 Comments
View All Comments
Lord-Bryan - Tuesday, April 11, 2017 - link
Ummmm Achaios, i don’t Anandtech is the right place, for all that sleazy fan war.ultima_trev - Tuesday, April 11, 2017 - link
My 1800X gets 2,062 in Passmark single thread. Not that Passmark is the lone dictator of IPC.rarson - Tuesday, April 11, 2017 - link
According to your data, Haswell IPC is equal to Kaby Lake IPC.Meteor2 - Wednesday, April 12, 2017 - link
Um, you need to divide by frequency to get IPC. Clue's in the name.Ammaross - Wednesday, April 12, 2017 - link
So, you're saying that your 4770K beat out a 7700K in single threaded. And now you argue "IPC" with this benchmark? Go home, you're drunk.zeeBomb - Tuesday, April 11, 2017 - link
This is good. This is great...this is AWESOMEsor - Tuesday, April 11, 2017 - link
This is pretty great. When Ryzen is behind, it is not often and not far. When it is ahead, it is far ahead.TadzioPazur - Tuesday, April 11, 2017 - link
"Looking at the results, it’s hard to notice the effect that 12 threads has on multithreaded CPU tests."(..)it's hard NOT to notice(...)"?
bmasumian - Tuesday, April 11, 2017 - link
Your Amazon link to Ryzen 5 isn't working.AndrewJacksonZA - Tuesday, April 11, 2017 - link
Page 5 - FCAT - Graph Heading/Text ErrorThe text says "For our test, we take a 90-second clip of the Rise of the Tomb Raider benchmark running on a GTX 980 Ti at 1440p"
but the graph heading says "System: FCAT Processing ROTR 1440p GTX1080 Data"