The AMD Ryzen 5 1600X vs Core i5 Review: Twelve Threads vs Four at $250
by Ian Cutress on April 11, 2017 9:00 AM ESTGPU Tests: Rise of the Tomb Raider DX12 (1080p, 4K)
Part 1 - Valley
GTX 1080
1060
R9 Fury
RX 480
2-Prophets
3-Mountain
GPU Tests: Rise of the Tomb Raider DX12 (1080p, 4K)
Part 1 - Valley
GTX 1080
1060
R9 Fury
RX 480
2-Prophets
3-Mountain
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
254 Comments
View All Comments
Outlander_04 - Wednesday, April 12, 2017 - link
The information is out therehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3VvwWTQKCZs
vladx - Wednesday, April 12, 2017 - link
That wasn't my point, readers shouldn't go elsewhere to compare with CPUs that are excluded due to bias.Meteor2 - Wednesday, April 12, 2017 - link
What relevance has a $340 CPU got to a $250 CPU review?vladx - Wednesday, April 12, 2017 - link
I'd say a ton more than the $499 Ryzen 7 1800x which didn't get excluded.psychobriggsy - Wednesday, April 12, 2017 - link
Yes, it's in the same product line, so people can see how it compares.Which seems to be roughly around 80% of the 1800X, for around half the price.
vladx - Wednesday, April 12, 2017 - link
And 7700k is more relevant for gaming which was the subject at hand so there you go.Meteor2 - Wednesday, April 12, 2017 - link
You didn't answer my question...vladx - Wednesday, April 12, 2017 - link
I just did, 7700k is more relevant than a 1800X in gaming benchmarks and as the competition it should've been included if a $499 CPU from AMD is included.psychobriggsy - Wednesday, April 12, 2017 - link
7700K is at a different price point, it rightly was compared in the Ryzen 7 reviews.Regardless, it would lose in the multithreaded benchmarks still, whilst having a small extra advantage in the gaming results.
vladx - Wednesday, April 12, 2017 - link
Ryzen 1800X is even more expensive than 7700k and yet got included in the gaming benchmarking, ironically considering 7700k is much more relevant for gaming.Sorry, but the bias and double standards are obvious in the article.