Crysis 3

Still one of our most punishing benchmarks 3 years later, Crysis 3 needs no introduction. Crytek’s DX11 masterpiece, Crysis 3’s Very High settings still punish even the best of video cards, never mind the rest. Along with its high performance requirements, Crysis 3 is a rather balanced game in terms of power consumption and vendor optimizations. As a result it can give us a good look at how our video cards stack up on average, and later on in this article how power consumption plays out.

Crysis 3 - 3840x2160 - Very High Quality + FXAA

Crysis 3 - 2560x1440 - Very High Quality + FXAA

Crysis 3 will vex cards at 4K for at least one more generation. At 48.9fps, the GTX 1080 Ti is the fastest of the bunch, and is starting to approach the 60fps mark. Still, even with a 36% performance lead over the GTX 1080 and a 77% performance lead over the GTX 980 Ti, 60fps is a bit more than any one card can handle.

Battlefield 4 The Witcher 3
Comments Locked

161 Comments

View All Comments

  • mapesdhs - Saturday, March 11, 2017 - link

    Some 780 Ti owners may have oc'd their cards that high, but not many I suspect. I've been searching for 780 Ti cards for a while, for CUDA, most tend to be around 980MHz at best.
  • mapesdhs - Saturday, March 11, 2017 - link

    Also recall one model which was 1002MHz.
  • Chaser - Thursday, March 9, 2017 - link

    Glad to see I have no need for a card that powerful and expensive. I run a single 27" 2K IPS monitor and my Gigabyte Extreme gaming 1080 is more than enough to keep me on the high end for years to come. 4K is 90% bragging rights in terms of visible difference and also game developer support.
  • sharath.naik - Thursday, March 9, 2017 - link

    I think you may need to consider multi monitor gaming. Then this card makes sense if you want to use this in a small case that allows only one GPU.
  • mapesdhs - Saturday, March 11, 2017 - link

    Depends on the game and what kind of detail one likes. Site reviews and forum commentaries also don't take into account game mods which often significantly increase the GPU load (check out the OCN Best Skyrim Pics thread, have a look at the builds people are using).

    I like to play games with all details/settings at maxed out. Thus, such a card is very relevant. Sure, plenty of players don't mind if the fps drops to 30 or 40, but some like it smooth at a minimum. I've currently no interest in high frequency monitors (which ironically can sensitise one's vision anyway), but I do seek 60Hz minimum sync'd, something I can't get atm with a single 980 at 1920x1200. I plan on moving up to 4K soon; with a 1080 Ti, and likely being able to get away with turning of some of the AA options because of the higher pixel density (which regains performance), minimum 60Hz looks very possible.

    It depends on one's needs; everyone has different thresholds of what they're happy with.
  • Chaser - Thursday, March 9, 2017 - link

    Very well written, balanced review. Nicely done Ryan.
  • BrokenCrayons - Thursday, March 9, 2017 - link

    +1!
  • nismotigerwvu - Thursday, March 9, 2017 - link

    Quality work as always Ryan! I spotted a minor typo on the conclusions page "Because the GeForce GTX 1080 Tii Founder’s Edition isn’t NVIDIA’s first GP102-based product". Did a little midnight coffee spill and make that i key sticky? :)
  • BrokenCrayons - Thursday, March 9, 2017 - link

    Typo/Error also on Page 4 of the review in the line that reads:

    "For our review of the GTX 1060, we’re using NVIDIA’s 378.78 driver."

    Probably should be "GTX 1080 Ti"

    The table directly below that line is also missing the GTX 1080 Ti in the video cards section.
  • Ryan Smith - Thursday, March 9, 2017 - link

    Thanks!

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now