Rise of the Tomb Raider

Starting things off in our benchmark suite is the built-in benchmark for Rise of the Tomb Raider, the latest iteration in the long-running action-adventure gaming series. One of the unique aspects of this benchmark is that it’s actually the average of 4 sub-benchmarks that fly through different environments, which keeps the benchmark from being too weighted towards a GPU’s performance characteristics under any one scene.

Rise of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 - Very High Quality (DX11)

Rise of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 - Very High Quality (DX11)

As we’re looking at the highest of high-end cards here, the performance comparisons are pretty straightforward. There’s the GTX 1080 Ti versus the GTX 1080, and then for owners with older cards looking for an upgrade, there’s the GTX 1080 Ti versus the GTX 980 Ti and GTX 780 Ti. It goes without saying that the GTX 1080 Ti is the fastest card that is (or tomorrow will be) on the market, so the only outstanding question is just how much faster NVIDIA’s latest card really is.

As you’d expect, the GTX 1080 Ti’s performance lead is dependent in part on the resolution tested. The higher the resolution the more GPU-bound a game is, and the more opportunity there is for the card to stretch its 3GB advantage in VRAM. In the case of Tomb Raider, the GTX 1080 Ti ends up being 33% faster than the GTX 1080 at 4K, and 26% faster at 1440p.

Otherwise against the 28nm GTX 980 Ti and GTX 780 Ti, the performance gains become very large very quickly. The GTX 1080 Ti holds a 70% lead over the GTX 980 here at 4K, and it’s a full 2.6x faster than the GTX 780 Ti. The end result is that whereas the GTX 980 Ti was the first card to crack 30fps at 4K on Tomb Raider, the GTX 1080 Ti is the first card that can actually average 60fps or better.

Driver Performance & The Test DiRT Rally
Comments Locked

161 Comments

View All Comments

  • mapesdhs - Saturday, March 11, 2017 - link

    Some 780 Ti owners may have oc'd their cards that high, but not many I suspect. I've been searching for 780 Ti cards for a while, for CUDA, most tend to be around 980MHz at best.
  • mapesdhs - Saturday, March 11, 2017 - link

    Also recall one model which was 1002MHz.
  • Chaser - Thursday, March 9, 2017 - link

    Glad to see I have no need for a card that powerful and expensive. I run a single 27" 2K IPS monitor and my Gigabyte Extreme gaming 1080 is more than enough to keep me on the high end for years to come. 4K is 90% bragging rights in terms of visible difference and also game developer support.
  • sharath.naik - Thursday, March 9, 2017 - link

    I think you may need to consider multi monitor gaming. Then this card makes sense if you want to use this in a small case that allows only one GPU.
  • mapesdhs - Saturday, March 11, 2017 - link

    Depends on the game and what kind of detail one likes. Site reviews and forum commentaries also don't take into account game mods which often significantly increase the GPU load (check out the OCN Best Skyrim Pics thread, have a look at the builds people are using).

    I like to play games with all details/settings at maxed out. Thus, such a card is very relevant. Sure, plenty of players don't mind if the fps drops to 30 or 40, but some like it smooth at a minimum. I've currently no interest in high frequency monitors (which ironically can sensitise one's vision anyway), but I do seek 60Hz minimum sync'd, something I can't get atm with a single 980 at 1920x1200. I plan on moving up to 4K soon; with a 1080 Ti, and likely being able to get away with turning of some of the AA options because of the higher pixel density (which regains performance), minimum 60Hz looks very possible.

    It depends on one's needs; everyone has different thresholds of what they're happy with.
  • Chaser - Thursday, March 9, 2017 - link

    Very well written, balanced review. Nicely done Ryan.
  • BrokenCrayons - Thursday, March 9, 2017 - link

    +1!
  • nismotigerwvu - Thursday, March 9, 2017 - link

    Quality work as always Ryan! I spotted a minor typo on the conclusions page "Because the GeForce GTX 1080 Tii Founder’s Edition isn’t NVIDIA’s first GP102-based product". Did a little midnight coffee spill and make that i key sticky? :)
  • BrokenCrayons - Thursday, March 9, 2017 - link

    Typo/Error also on Page 4 of the review in the line that reads:

    "For our review of the GTX 1060, we’re using NVIDIA’s 378.78 driver."

    Probably should be "GTX 1080 Ti"

    The table directly below that line is also missing the GTX 1080 Ti in the video cards section.
  • Ryan Smith - Thursday, March 9, 2017 - link

    Thanks!

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now