Mixed Random Read/Write Performance

The mixed random I/O benchmark starts with a pure read test and gradually increases the proportion of writes, finishing with pure writes. The queue depth is 3 for the entire test and each subtest lasts for 3 minutes, for a total test duration of 18 minutes. As with the pure random write test, this test is restricted to a 16GB span of the drive, which is empty save for the 16GB test file.

Iometer - Mixed 4KB Random Read/Write

All three capacities of the ADATA SU800 deliver good performance for their class on this test. The Crucial MX300 and the earlier Silicon Motion engineering sample offer slightly higher performance.

Iometer - Mixed 4KB Random Read/Write (Power)

Power consumption is a little higher than average, but given the good performance, the SU800's efficiency is not bad.

The 128GB SU800 runs out of SLC cache before the end of this test, leading to poor performance during the final phase of the test where the workload is 100% writes. The larger SU800s show increasing performance over the course of the test as more writes can be cached and combined.

Mixed Sequential Read/Write Performance

The mixed sequential access test covers the entire span of the drive and uses a queue depth of one. It starts with a pure read test and gradually increases the proportion of writes, finishing with pure writes. Each subtest lasts for 3 minutes, for a total test duration of 18 minutes. The drive is filled before the test starts.

Iometer - Mixed 128KB Sequential Read/Write

Capacity is a big factor in performance on this test. The 512GB SU800 performs quite well for a budget drive, while the 128GB is clearly slower than its competitors.

Iometer - Mixed 128KB Sequential Read/Write (Power)

The power consumption of the SU800 on this test is only slightly higher than average.

For the SU800, performance over the course of this test is largely a question of how soon the SLC cache fills up. The 128GB runs out very early while the 512GB doesn't bottom out until the second half of the test.

Sequential Performance ATTO, AS-SSD & Idle Power Consumption
Comments Locked

35 Comments

View All Comments

  • lopri - Thursday, February 2, 2017 - link

    I kind of mixed SATA interface with mechanical hard drive in the above post. My mistake.
  • Neeson - Thursday, February 2, 2017 - link

    I personally use 512GB SU800 now. With the SLC, the read/write performance is excellent. Especially, when I play games, SU800 NEVER slows down. ADATA SU800 can perform pretty well and the price is right. I like it. (Sharing my own experience)
  • lopri - Thursday, February 2, 2017 - link

    The drives look like a decent upgrade option for those who are on mechanical drives or earlier generation of SSDs. I like the thorough review as well as the value assessment. Nevertheless the product is a yawner for tech savvy consumers because it has really no distinguishing feature. I guess the actual market price will be the sole determining factor.
  • realbabilu - Friday, February 3, 2017 - link

    Any clue entry ssd vs sshd drives. I want to update my laptop
  • jhon1616 - Thursday, December 27, 2018 - link

    Adata Su800 512Gb TBW is 400TB if is baaed on same chips of micron that is cruicial mx300 how can be it 400TB since mx300 525gb tbw is 160tb it is very confusing or ADATA JUST CHANGED SPECS THAT IS INVALID

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now