AnandTech Storage Bench - The Destroyer

The Destroyer is an extremely long test replicating the access patterns of very IO-intensive desktop usage. A detailed breakdown can be found in this article. Like real-world usage and unlike our Iometer tests, the drives do get the occasional break that allows for some background garbage collection and flushing caches, but those idle times are limited to 25ms so that it doesn't take all week to run the test.

We quantify performance on this test by reporting the drive's average data throughput, a few data points about its latency, and the total energy used by the drive over the course of the test.

AnandTech Storage Bench - The Destroyer (Data Rate)

The average data rates delivered by the ADATA SU800 are slower than most of its competition, but it is improved over the earlier engineering sample from Silicon Motion and the Intel 540s that paired the SM2258 controller with SK Hynix 16nm TLC.

AnandTech Storage Bench - The Destroyer (Latency)

Latency is a weak point for the SU800, with average service times that are higher than almost all of its competition. The 128GB SU800 suffers the most, with an average over 21ms.

AnandTech Storage Bench - The Destroyer (Latency)

AnandTech Storage Bench - The Destroyer (Latency)

Aside from the smallest 128GB capacity, the SU800 doesn't have too many operations that take more than 100ms to complete, but at the 10ms threshold all three capacities rank poorly against the competition.

AnandTech Storage Bench - The Destroyer (Power)

With so much time spent bogged down by garbage collection, it is no surprise that the smaller capacities of the SU800 use somewhat more power than most of the competition. The 512GB SU800 compares favorably against the planar TLC competition, but doesn't come close to the efficiency of the Crucial MX300.

Performance Consistency AnandTech Storage Bench - Heavy
Comments Locked

35 Comments

View All Comments

  • lopri - Thursday, February 2, 2017 - link

    I kind of mixed SATA interface with mechanical hard drive in the above post. My mistake.
  • Neeson - Thursday, February 2, 2017 - link

    I personally use 512GB SU800 now. With the SLC, the read/write performance is excellent. Especially, when I play games, SU800 NEVER slows down. ADATA SU800 can perform pretty well and the price is right. I like it. (Sharing my own experience)
  • lopri - Thursday, February 2, 2017 - link

    The drives look like a decent upgrade option for those who are on mechanical drives or earlier generation of SSDs. I like the thorough review as well as the value assessment. Nevertheless the product is a yawner for tech savvy consumers because it has really no distinguishing feature. I guess the actual market price will be the sole determining factor.
  • realbabilu - Friday, February 3, 2017 - link

    Any clue entry ssd vs sshd drives. I want to update my laptop
  • jhon1616 - Thursday, December 27, 2018 - link

    Adata Su800 512Gb TBW is 400TB if is baaed on same chips of micron that is cruicial mx300 how can be it 400TB since mx300 525gb tbw is 160tb it is very confusing or ADATA JUST CHANGED SPECS THAT IS INVALID

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now