GRID Autosport

No graphics tests are complete without some input from Codemasters and the EGO engine, which means for this round of testing we point towards GRID: Autosport, the next iteration in the GRID and racing genre. As with our previous racing testing, each update to the engine aims to add in effects, reflections, detail and realism, with Codemasters making ‘authenticity’ a main focal point for this version.

GRID’s benchmark mode is very flexible, and as a result we created a test race using a shortened version of the Red Bull Ring with twelve cars doing two laps. The car is focus starts last and is quite fast, but usually finishes second or third. For low-end graphics we test at 1080p medium settings, whereas mid and high-end graphics get the full 1080p maximum. Both the average and minimum frame rates are recorded.

GRID: Autosport on ASUS GTX 980 Strix 4GB ($560)

GRID: Autosport on MSI R9 290X Gaming LE 4GB ($380)

GRID: Autosport on MSI GTX 770 Lightning 2GB ($245)

GRID: Autosport on MSI R9 285 Gaming 2GB ($240)

GRID: Autosport on ASUS R7 240 DDR3 2GB ($70)

GRID: Autosport on Integrated Graphics

GRID prefers a high frequency and high IPC, and so we see the Core i3-7350K getting noticably better frame rates over the 2600K at 1080p using all our high-end and mid-range GPUs - only at 720p using an R7 240 did we see a minimal difference. The integrated graphs are still amusing to look at.

Gaming: Grand Theft Auto V Gaming: Shadow of Mordor
Comments Locked

186 Comments

View All Comments

  • blzd - Friday, February 10, 2017 - link

    You may need to test with some newer games, some of which I read are having issues running with dual cores.

    Minimum FPS might be worth including as well.
  • Narg - Friday, February 10, 2017 - link

    I couldn't help remember the old Celerons from years past that could be overclocked to the point of more than double the performance of chips barely twice their price from Intel. This is nothing new. And glad to see Intel has really not lost their "geeky" mindset for the true hardware hardcore among us.
  • albert89 - Friday, February 17, 2017 - link

    You can run the i7-2600K on Win8.1 and down. You can't do that with the i3-7350.
  • TheJian - Wednesday, February 22, 2017 - link

    They testing the i3-7350 w/Z270 here and used the on chip gpu with Win7 x64. It would appear Wintel lied about Z270+Kaby lake not working with Win7? What driver is Ian Cutress using here for the integrated gpu testing? Please clear this up Ian.

    Wish they had used a 1080 gtx.
  • Vatharian - Friday, March 3, 2017 - link

    I'd be hardly pressed to change 2600K (which I had) to 2C/4T CPU. But then, I was blessed with a God's chip: my 2600K easily and comfortably reached 5.2 GHz at ~1.38 V. I really don't believe 7350K would catch up with THIS.

    BTW, anyone doing even just a little bit of coding on their PC would welcome compilation benchmark!
  • Artanis2 - Friday, June 9, 2017 - link

    Still to come

    Calculating Generational IPC Changes from Sandy Bridge to Kaby Lake
    Intel Core i7-7700K, i5-7600K and i3-7350K Overclocking: Hitting 5.0 GHz on AIR
    Intel Launches 200-Series Chipset Breakdown: Z270, H270, B250, Q250, C232
    Intel Z270 Motherboard Preview: A Quick Look at 80+ Motherboards

    WHEN ?!

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now