Color Modes: sRGB, DCI-P3, and Vivid

Next up, let’s take a look at the color gamut accuracy on the three different display modes. sRGB is the one that most people are going to want to use most of the time, because most applications do not have any color management, but in the images below you can see just how much larger the P3 gamut is. It appears P3 is making its way to being the next gamut for computers, but without color management, it is going to be a messy transition.

sRGB


SpectraCal CalMAN

sRGB is still the default target for almost everything, so it is important to get this one right, even more than the others. You can see that the Surface Studio easily covers the sRGB gamut, and it is almost perfect at doing it. Really only the white levels bring the error levels up, with the colors almost perfect for this gamut.

DCI-P3


SpectraCal CalMAN

The sRGB gamut coverage was good, but the DCI-P3 is even better, with a much more accurate white point for this color space really helping the average error level here. But take a good look at the actual white point in the image, which is the square inside the triangle. On this color space, the white point shifts much higher into green, and away from the pure white you would expect of sunlight, which we call D65. The DCI-P3 gamut does not use D65, and is therefore not really going to be used much on the Surface Studio.

Vivid


SpectraCal CalMAN

Although called Vivid, this color mode is the correct P3 color space for computers, which is P3 D65. The gamut coverage is the same as DCI-P3, but the white point moves to the D65 point which is sunlight at noon. The Surface Studio is somehow even more accurate hitting this gamut than the two that are correctly named. Using the name Vivid is a poor choice in naming this when the other two color spaces are named correctly, so if you do own or buy a Studio, and you do want to look at P3 gamut content, Vivid is the correct color space to choose for this.

Color Accuracy

Now that we’ve looked at the various color spaces, it’s time to examine each one individually to see how the Surface Studio performs when set to each color space.

sRGB

On the sRGB tests, the grayscale and saturation tests were done to the new 2017 standard of 4-bit steps rather than 5% and 20% steps respectively. This gives a better picture of what the display is doing, and a much more accurate gamma result.

Grayscale

SpectraCal CalMAN

Display - Grayscale Accuracy

Microsoft nailed the gamma, which should be 2.2, and it very nearly is. However some errors creep up in the grayscale as the image gets closer to 100% white, with the red levels too high, and green a bit low. Overall, it’s still a very good average result, but not perfect. Notice how far they have come since the Surface Pro 3.

Saturation


SpectraCal CalMAN

Display - Saturation Accuracy

Once again, other than the white level errors at 100% white, the saturation result is fantastic. An overall error level of just 1.36 is very strong, and the individual color traces show that there are no real issues with any of the primary or secondary colors when set to sRGB.

Gretag Macbeth


SpectraCal CalMAN

Display - GMB Accuracy

This test is the most comprehensive test, covering a large number of color points, including the important flesh tones. Here, again, the Surface Studio ends up with a fantastic result, and other than a single color, most of the errors are less than two, with many much closer to one. The sRGB results have started off very strong.

DCI-P3

Grayscale


SpectraCal CalMAN

When testing for the DCI-P3 color space, the gamma changes to 2.4, and the Surface Studio correctly hits this gamma as well. Across the entire grayscale sweep, the red, blue, and green levels are very consistent, and the average error level is just 1.27, which is outstanding. The display hits this new gamma and white point almost perfectly.

Saturation


SpectraCal CalMAN

Continuing its impressive results, the Surface Studio is practically perfect on the DCI-P3 saturation sweeps. The blue results and 100% white are the only real issues, but neither of them are really much of an issue at all.

Gretag Macbeth


SpectraCal CalMAN

An average error level under one is a great result again, and although there are a few individual colors that jump up to dE 2000 of three or so, almost every color tested is well under one.

Vivid (P3 D65)

Grayscale


SpectraCal CalMAN

The P3 D65 gamut moves back to a gamma of 2.2, and the Surface Studio nicely hits that. The error levels on the grays are all very low, with only 97.3% white jumping over the two line. The D65 white point is also almost perfect, with the red just a bit higher than it should be, but not to a level that would be very noticeable.

Saturation


SpectraCal CalMAN

The saturation graph is amazingly accurate. Only 20% yellow even crosses the one mark, outside of white and black.

Gretag Macbeth


SpectraCal CalMAN

Finally, the Gretag Macbeth test continues the trend of fantastic display calibration on the Surface Studio. Just a single color tested has an error level over three, with pretty much the rest of the tested colors showing an error level of under one. It is a pretty fantastic result.

Display Conclusions

It’s difficult to not be impressed by the work put into the Surface Studio’s display. Here we have a display with an ICC profile for sRGB, DCI-P3, and P3 D65, and in every gamut, the accuracy levels are near, if not the best, that have ever been tested on this site. It is a fantastic achievement, and a testament to what can happen if a company decides to focus on quality. There is no doubt that the Surface Studio’s display is the stand-out feature on this PC, and Microsoft has taken the time to individually calibrate each display to one of the highest levels of accuracy possible.

The fact that this display also features ten-point multitouch, and pen support, as well as having accuracy that is top-notch, makes the Surface Studio arguably the best computer display targeted towards consumers and prosumers. Combine that with the excellent 3:2 aspect ratio, the high pixel density, and practically perfect display scaling, and it would be hard to find any faults with this display. It truly is a masterpiece.

The PixelSense Display System Performance
Comments Locked

197 Comments

View All Comments

  • Manch - Sunday, January 22, 2017 - link

    The tech came from a company called perceptive pixel which MS bought out. It used to require some hefty GPU & CPU resources to work one of those tables. It still does in a sense, but nowhere near as it used to be. MS helped refine the tech quite a bit.
  • theuglyman0war - Saturday, January 28, 2017 - link

    I really hope they do not stop dev of the dial idea. I'd love future iterations with inner and outer rings for more navigation possibilities. Hopefully supporting an open Development community like they did with Kinect.
    I have dreams Of GVG grass Valley Group shuttle seek sexiness that is portable as a puck and whose position onscreen can be programmed by me for the tools and pipelines I greedily need that is unique to my needs.
    I want! almost as much as I want them to go up to a 36 inch display! ( which would had been the smallest canvas I ever stretched to paint on. Crazy! I live in a world where smaller is always better. It is not )
  • TEAMSWITCHER - Friday, January 20, 2017 - link

    The only big advantage I see is the hinge and pen driven touchscreen. This product reminds me of the flying car... Where your target market is limited to people that have a pilot licence and want to drive an ugly unsafe car. Surface Studio appeals most to the artist that does not care about value or performance.
  • Brett Howse - Friday, January 20, 2017 - link

    OK so the advantages of this are exactly it's strong points. Good to know.
  • Manch - Sunday, January 22, 2017 - link

    ^^^LMFAO!!!
  • melgross - Friday, January 20, 2017 - link

    Now, if Microsoft can figure out how to sell any of these things. They haven't broken 4 million in yearly sales for the Surface line of tablets yet. In fact, going by the sales numbers in dollars, they sold just about 3.7 million in the past 12 months. I really don't know why such a big deal is being made of these things.

    Surface Book sales are very poor too. There's a lot of hype going on about these products, which seems to be wasted words.
  • nathanddrews - Friday, January 20, 2017 - link

    It takes a couple years for the enterprise world to catch up. Lots of businesses still running Windows 7, lots of competition from HP and Dell hardware, especially in the tablet/convertible space. Extended Windows 7 support ends in 2020...
  • melgross - Friday, January 20, 2017 - link

    The enterprise has had plenty of time. Surface Pro products seem to mostly be used by IT. I've never seen one anywhere else. They are very expensive, particularly for a Windows product, as is this.
  • Icehawk - Sunday, January 22, 2017 - link

    We have a few but they are limited to the execs due to cost vs normal laptops, they don't work with multiple monitors reliably which is great fun to support
  • SaolDan - Sunday, January 22, 2017 - link

    you must live in California.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now