Wireless

Microsoft has stuck with it’s tried and tested Marvell AVASTAR 802.11ac wireless adapter for the Surface Studio, and they’ve been using this NIC for quite a while on the Surface devices, so this isn’t a surprise. Over the years, the experience with the Marvell adapter has not been the best, although recent driver updates have both improved performance, and made the adapter less prone to not finding networks to connect to.

WiFi Performance - TCP

How times have changed. The Surface Pro 4 in the above graph has the same network adapter, but you can see how far Marvell has come with the drivers. It has been solid so far in regards to connections as well, and hopefully that doesn't change. The Surface Book, with the same adapter, sometimes needs to be restarted to fix the networking even to this day.

The Surface Studio also has the Intel I219-LM Gigabit Ethernet adapter, for those that prefer a wired network connection. It does provide a better experience if you do have a cable handy, since even the best 3x3 802.11ac cards can’t really compete with Gigabit wired.

Audio

When it comes to audio, Microsoft had to put some extra work into the Surface Studio to ensure that the audio experience wasn’t impacted by too severely by moving the display. A lot more engineering went into this than you would expect, and the Surface Studio features a total of seven speakers. Apparently the Surface team decided to go big, or go home, so they fit four speakers into a downward firing grille at the bottom of the display, plus there are two additional speakers in the base. The final speaker is a subwoofer to help out on the low frequencies.

Four of the Studio speakers are on the bottom edge of the display, and another two plus a sub are in the base

The sound quality of the Surface Studio is far better than you would expect for a small, tightly packed device like it is, and having the speakers in multiple locations helps out when the display gets moved into the drafting mode, since the ones on the base can now chip in to make up for the speakers on the display no longer as optimally oriented.

The system gets quite loud, and I measured a maximum of 88 dB(A) when playing music, and the sound was not distorted even at maximum volume. The subwoofer definitely helps out too, with decent frequency response even on the low end of the scale. It’s not a home theater in a box by any means, but it would likely be enough for many people.

Thermals, and Noise

Packing a PC into a space the size of the base of a Surface Studio, especially with a GTX 980M inside, is quite a challenge, but ensuring that the system does not overheat, even under load, is often too much for small devices like this. There are two fans inside the Surface Studio, and they vent out a row of slots in the black plastic underneath the computer.

When discussing the cooling with the Surface team, they were very proud of the work they had done there, especially the amount of heat dissipated per dB of noise. In order to test the thermal capabilities of the Surface Studio, the Tomb Raider benchmark was run continuously at 1920x1080 Ultra settings, which loads the GPU up to 100%.

The cooling system is very good in the Surface Studio, despite the significant heat generated by the GTX 980M. The system was able to run for five minutes at maximum boost clock of 1126 MHz before the GPU hit the thermal limit of 87°C, at which point it reduced its frequency to 1050 MHz over time, and stayed right there for the rest of the test. Perhaps the most impressive bit is that even with the GPU at 100% load, the sound pressure level with a meter over the keyboard, was just 46 dB(A), and the sound frequency is low enough that it isn’t bothersome. Microsoft did their homework on the cooling system, and the Surface Studio is solid under load.

Where it is let down though is at idle. Despite being very quiet under load, at idle, the system still produces 37.5 dB(A), and the fans constantly run. The CPU and GPU idle around 39°C, which is very reasonable, but the sound is always there. It’s not loud, but it’s always there. For me, desktop systems should be almost silent under light workloads, but that’s not the case on the Studio, which is disappointing.

The other issue on the noise side, at least on this review unit, is that there is a small amount of coil whine when the system has the display off, but it’s not yet sleeping. Most likely, this is the power supply, which is also built into the base of the Studio, coping with the reduced power demand since it isn’t driving the display backlight anymore. Once it goes to sleep, it’s not an issue, but the system does wake up periodically to update email, and the like, so even if it is sitting there asleep on the desk, occasionally the coil whine will come back, and the fans kick in.

GPU and Storage Performance Final Words
Comments Locked

197 Comments

View All Comments

  • Valantar - Saturday, January 21, 2017 - link

    "The most frustrating part of the Surface Studio base is that all the inputs and outputs are on the rear of the device, so connecting something over USB, or inserting a SD card into the PC, is not as simple as it should be. This is a form over function decision, and it would be nice to see some of the ports offered at least on the side of the base to make it a bit easier to access."

    Not quite form over function - the hinge mechanism and 20 degree angle would interfere with ports on all three sides (the hinges fold flat along the sides, and the display either touches the front or comes very, very close when folded all the way down. Cables, SD cards and the like sticking out would make this a hassle, and essentially break the functionality that is the core of this computer.
  • Brett Howse - Saturday, January 21, 2017 - link

    Yes, it wouldn't work in the current design perfectly (although the SD card could easily be at the front) but regardless, having all of the ports on the rear makes it a chore to access them.
  • Manch - Monday, January 23, 2017 - link

    I saw that and thought a break out box would be nice. Of course that would make it less tidy, but having a bunch of cables run from around the backside worse.
  • alkonaut - Saturday, January 21, 2017 - link

    Is the motherboard and other hardware in the base, separate from the screen, meaning it could (at least in theory) be replaced while keeping the display?

    A display this good/expensive *has* to last at least 3 computers - so a definite no-go if it has to follow the motherboard/cpu/ram/ssd to the trash in 3 years!
  • Brett Howse - Saturday, January 21, 2017 - link

    In theory, but unlikely this would ever be practical
  • Manch - Monday, January 23, 2017 - link

    I think we will see this with an upgraded base ala Surface Book. I doubt it will ever be user upgradeable which would be a nice. I don't know why people insist this will be in the trash in 3 years. Give it to me! If intels progress is any indication, you CPU will be good for a loooong time. Also for what this is designed for, I just don't see the applications out running the hardware anytime soon. With the Creators Update not out for a bit, I think they had enough time and should have went 1060/107 at least for the high end. Overall, a lust worthy machine. I don't need one, but damn I wouldn't mind having one.
  • mobutu - Sunday, January 22, 2017 - link

    I applaud the company for this obsessive attention to detail but what in the hell were they thinking fitting oldtech inside? thats just crazy and goes on the opposite spectrum of that obsessive attention to detail!

    -new cpu
    -new gpu (lol, easily the BIGGEST mistake)
    -ssd pcienvme only (I take a piss on their hybrid crap)
    -in 2017, any computer should be dead silent while doing light workloads (browse, email etc). WTF they were thinking, designing this device with artists/creators in mind and giving them a noisy computer when they need SILENCE to be able to create properly!!!
    -still big bezels on the otherwise wonderful display.

    And LOL, ETA 6months for a GTX980??? thats gotta be a joke or something, when your "new" pc is arriving, that maxell is gonna be very ancient tech already, not just old!

    As usual, wait for the next wave when they'll learn their lesson. Buying this now is kinda stupid.
  • mobutu - Sunday, January 22, 2017 - link

    also, forgot about no usbc thinderbolt hdmi dp ... so connectivity also suffers in the curent implementation
  • fanofanand - Monday, January 23, 2017 - link

    Artists don't have a clue about anything you just wrote. They will just see the price tag and think "man this thing must be good" and will buy it. Do you really think the average artist knows the difference between a 965, a 980, and a 1080?
  • nerd1 - Sunday, January 22, 2017 - link

    So.. monitor is AWESOME and other parts are worse than $1500 laptop. Why doesn't they sell the monitor+touchscreen as a separate USB-C device, i.e. for $1500? I'd get one ASAP!

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now