Office Performance

The dynamics of CPU Turbo modes, both Intel and AMD, can cause concern during environments with a variable threaded workload. There is also an added issue of the motherboard remaining consistent, depending on how the motherboard manufacturer wants to add in their own boosting technologies over the ones that Intel would prefer they used. In order to remain consistent, we implement an OS-level unique high performance mode on all the CPUs we test which should override any motherboard manufacturer performance mode.

All of our benchmark results can also be found in our benchmark engine, Bench.

Dolphin Benchmark: link

Many emulators are often bound by single thread CPU performance, and general reports tended to suggest that Haswell provided a significant boost to emulator performance. This benchmark runs a Wii program that raytraces a complex 3D scene inside the Dolphin Wii emulator. Performance on this benchmark is a good proxy of the speed of Dolphin CPU emulation, which is an intensive single core task using most aspects of a CPU. Results are given in minutes, where the Wii itself scores 17.53 minutes.

Dolphin Emulation Benchmark

Since a big uptick in emulator performance with Sandy Bridge, the Intel processor line has had a good run in Dolphin and that continues with Kaby Lake. This is shown with the Core i7-7600K coming above the i7-6700K and i7-4790K, both former leaders in this benchmark.  

WinRAR 5.0.1: link

Our WinRAR test from 2013 is updated to the latest version of WinRAR at the start of 2014. We compress a set of 2867 files across 320 folders totaling 1.52 GB in size – 95% of these files are small typical website files, and the rest (90% of the size) are small 30 second 720p videos.

WinRAR 5.01, 2867 files, 1.52 GB

WinRAR is more geared towards a variable threaded environment but also memory speed. In the last of ‘which benchmarks benefit from hyperthreads’, WinRAR is in – almost every Core i5 takes a back seat to all the Core i7 parts. We see performance jumps moving from i3 to i5, and a smaller one from i5 to i7, but in the case of WinRAR it’s quite obvious that threads matter here.

3D Particle Movement v2

3DPM is a self-penned benchmark, taking basic 3D movement algorithms used in Brownian Motion simulations and testing them for speed. High floating point performance, MHz and IPC wins the day. This is the second variant of this benchmark, fixing for false sharing in the first version, and lending itself to better multithreaded performance.

3D Particle Movement v2.0 beta-1

3DPMv2 is still new, so we don’t have too many results for it so far – even to go and say that Kaby Lake is the only set of i5 processors it has been run on. 3DPMv2, like WinRAR, likes hyperthreads as well, so we see the Core i7-6700T sit above the i5-7600K despite the frequency difference. In a benchmark like this, the older AMD FX processors come into play and the FX-8370 knocks on the door of the i5.

SYSMark 2014

Engineered by BAPco (to which Intel is a consortium member), this set of tests are designed to be an office/data/media/financial range of tests using common well-known CAD, image editing, web browsing and other tools to put out a score, where a score of 1000 is attributed to an old Core i3 using a mechanical harddrive. Here we report the overall score, however the test breakdowns can be found in Bench.

SYSmark 2014 - Overall

Because SYSMark is a variety of tests that rely on response and throughput, the Core i5-7600K hits a good score in the middle of most of the previous generation extreme processors but also gives a good 5% on the previous generation i5-6600K.

Web Benchmarks

On the lower end processors, general usability is a big factor of experience, especially as we move into the HTML5 era of web browsing.  For our web benchmarks, we take well known tests with Chrome as installed by SYSMark as a consistent browser.

Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Kraken 1.1

Google Octane v2

Google Octane v2

Test Bed and Setup Professional Performance on Windows
Comments Locked

70 Comments

View All Comments

  • Obviously Dead - Wednesday, July 26, 2017 - link

    Depends. For me it's the best yet, since I'm upgrading from an E5400.
  • Dr. Swag - Tuesday, January 3, 2017 - link

    Hey Ian, where's the 6700k in these benchmarks? It's in the 7700k review but not the 7600k review :/
  • Bullwinkle J Moose - Tuesday, January 3, 2017 - link

    What benefit does this bring to me?

    A fresh install of Windows XP-SP2 boots in 3 seconds on my 35 watt Sandy Bridge

    I can block NSA and FBI malware on XP but not on Windows Spyware Platform 10

    For audio production, I can record what I hear in XP but not in 7/8 or 10

    I can still boot to 10 if I want malware and spyware relabeled as DRM but I haven't had a Blue Screen of death in over 10 years now with XP-SP2 and I do not get persistent malware, so......

    What's the point of getting this new chip ?

    Why pay more to be limited as to what I can do with "MY" computer?

    I'm not trolling
    It's a serious question

    So answer it honestly without the attacks (Crayons)

    Why downgrade to an OS that limits what you can do on a hardware platform that also limits what you can run?
  • Eletriarnation - Tuesday, January 3, 2017 - link

    If you're running Windows XP on Sandy Bridge, it's my guess that Intel isn't really targeting your use case and maybe you shouldn't be surprised that you see no benefit in upgrading.
  • Murloc - Tuesday, January 3, 2017 - link

    if you are so concerned with this stuff and security, why don't you use open source software so you can be sure of what it does?
    Then you'd be able to get all the benefits of modern OSes (which are many compared to XP) without the spyware.
  • Ninhalem - Tuesday, January 3, 2017 - link

    Just stop. You're trolling. This is the same comment in the Kaby Lake i7 article. Your usage scenario is beyond minuscule compared to every other mainstream and enterprise system.
  • Bullwinkle J Moose - Wednesday, January 4, 2017 - link

    Ninhalem
    Presenting FACTS regarding these chips and how they can and cannot be used is not trolling

    I can provide all the evidence needed to show anyone how to lock down XP to a VERY secure state

    I cannot do the same for Windows 7/8 or 10 due to the malware and spyware that Microsoft calls DRM to get around the Law for the purpose of committing what are considered Very serious crimes if done by you or me

    If you wish to reproduce my results, I can show you how but this is NOT trolling

    Only negative responses to my posts without any evidence or effort given to reproduce my results are from Trolls

    Read replies by Crayons for trolling examples
    He is a Pro!
  • lopri - Wednesday, January 4, 2017 - link

    You piqued my interest. Is there something I can look up as to how to lock down XP to a secure state?
  • jimbo2779 - Wednesday, January 4, 2017 - link

    The power button is quite useful for keeping XP secure.

    Seriously though, the guy is trolling, to what ends I do not know, but his use case apparently has no need for any of the multitude of improvements brought in from vista onwards.

    From what I gather from all his posts all he wants to do is test malware and prove his locked down XP is secure. Personally I use my system for much more and don't remember the last ti.e I caught any kind if malware infection so have no need to stay shackled by an out dated OS.

    To each their own I guess
  • Bullwinkle J Moose - Wednesday, January 4, 2017 - link

    lopri
    Is there something I can look up as to how to lock down XP to a secure state?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    yes, you can read my posts and try what I have done for yourself so you have your own evidence instead of believing the majority voice at every turn and finding your computer can never be secured

    or, you can choose to believe Microsoft and continue to think that DRM opening backdoors into your system is a good thing and is keeping you safe by watching everything you do to ....
    A. Protect You?
    or
    B. Protect a Monopoly that cannot be overturned because protecting MY right to privacy is in direct violation of the Laws the Monopoly created to prevent me from defeating "their" DRM

    I say it is B.
    The only way they can survive is by preventing me from doing what they are doing ensuring their own survival at my expense

    I do not recognize their (your) Laws or their (your) License

    I will continue to violate any Law or License that grants anyone rights that they choose to deny me

    So to humor me for the Lulz is a waste of time

    but you already knew that

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now