The Intel Core i7-7700K (91W) Review: The New Out-of-the-box Performance Champion
by Ian Cutress on January 3, 2017 12:02 PM ESTGRID Autosport
No graphics tests are complete without some input from Codemasters and the EGO engine, which means for this round of testing we point towards GRID: Autosport, the next iteration in the GRID and racing genre. As with our previous racing testing, each update to the engine aims to add in effects, reflections, detail and realism, with Codemasters making ‘authenticity’ a main focal point for this version.
GRID’s benchmark mode is very flexible, and as a result we created a test race using a shortened version of the Red Bull Ring with twelve cars doing two laps. The car is focus starts last and is quite fast, but usually finishes second or third. For low-end graphics we test at 1080p medium settings, whereas mid and high-end graphics get the full 1080p maximum. Both the average and minimum frame rates are recorded.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
125 Comments
View All Comments
Michael Bay - Saturday, January 14, 2017 - link
Doom is not very CPU-intensive, and Battlefield is just drek.cpy - Wednesday, January 4, 2017 - link
OMG AVX offset? What took them so long! I need AVX offset for my 4770K! That thing really mess with my OC. It feels like everytime AVX is used i need +0.1V to CPU.thekdub - Wednesday, January 4, 2017 - link
Why is the 4790K "highly overclocked" in these benchmarks, while everything else appears to be running at stock speeds? I was hoping to get some insight as to where my stock 4790K stacks against this new chip as I'm on the fence about upgrading this year or waiting another generation. Instead, I'm stuck making inferences and trying to guess the difference in speed between a known variable and a vague statement of "highly overclocked".Achaios - Wednesday, January 4, 2017 - link
@OP: It is a mistake that you did not explicitly state the OC of the chips you compared.The only thing I am interested right now is the release pf the 1080TI, so please ANANDTECH do your best to bring us some news (preview) regarding.
CPU releases are completely uninteresting and by-and-large meaningless to anyone on a K Sandy Bridge CPU.
I am on a Haswell, and don't see myself upgrading before 2020. Conversely, up to 2020, I would have upgraded my GPU twice.
Achaios - Wednesday, January 4, 2017 - link
"by-and-large meaningless to anyone on a K Sandy Bridge CPU OR LATER". Please consider adding an EDIT function too. :-)just4U - Wednesday, January 4, 2017 - link
Yeah.. there isn't really much of a jump is there? Buying a 7700K for people already on High End I7's made in the past few years is more about ... just wanting something newer, with maybe taking advantage of what some of the newest MBs offer.. I think anyway. Speed? Pfft... you already got that..Now if they released a mainstream I7 that had 6 cores/12 threads in the same package, well then.. that might be something of a different story. (..shrug) intels loss.
Badelhas - Wednesday, January 4, 2017 - link
"Given that Intel has no competition, it is perhaps easy to roll out a new mainstream performance champion".This frase sums it up. And this is why I still own a SandyBridge i5 2500K overclocked to 4.4Ghz (a 33% increase) and find no need to upgrade. Intel is not even trying. It´s just SAD.
Thatguy97 - Wednesday, January 4, 2017 - link
When ivy bridge came out I saw this comingwillis936 - Wednesday, January 4, 2017 - link
Wow I can't believe it: an entire generation of CPUs that change absolutely nothing about the microarchitecture design or transistor size. Why even bother rolling out new SKUs?willis936 - Wednesday, January 4, 2017 - link
This would have been the perfect generation to add eDRAM to the K series. If only AMD would put out.