Still Image Performance

Now that we’ve discussed the basics of the iPhone 7 and 7 Plus camera we can start to get into how it actually performs relative to the iPhone 6s and 6s Plus as well the current competition on the market. While we normally run an ISO test to check spatial resolution this has been deferred to a future portion of the review. Unfortunately we don't really have the ability to do time-invariant testing here in a serious manner to the same extent that an OEM might, so we're effectively limited to tripod comparisons of real-world subjects.

Daytime Photography

In this kind of scenario the iPhone 7 and 7 Plus are directly comparable in the 1x mode. Because the primary camera has OIS and the secondary camera doesn't, it looks like it's fairly difficult for Apple to do an exact pixel to pixel correlation to the extent that the two outputs can be merged into a single image. As a result it's fairly obvious that the 1x mode has less detail than the 2x mode here. I can really see how this would be useful in general, as the longer focal length means more detail relative to anything else on the market but also allows for more interesting framing. The 1x camera is identical to the iPhone 7, and here it's definitely noticeable that the iPhone 7 can't quite keep up with the Galaxy S7 or HTC 10 in sheer detail in these kinds of shots.

Daytime Photography 2

In the interest of trying to not just take a single landscape photo and declare it to be a representative sample for all photos ever taken of all time with a smartphone in daytime conditions, I went ahead and took another sample shot of a mostly static subject. Here the iPhone 7 Plus in 1x mode is pretty much comparable to the iPhone 6s and Galaxy S7 as far as detail goes. I would argue that the HTC 10 captures slightly more detail at the center, but this probably isn't a surprise when the sensor is significantly larger. It's also worth noting that the iPhone 7 Plus manages to show better dynamic range here as the highlights off to the right retain more color detail than most devices tested and the shadows contain more detail that what is found on the Galaxy S7 or the iPhone 6s Plus. Once again, at 2x the iPhone 7 Plus is really just ridiculously good at capturing the sheer amount of detail that the tree has which isn't really captured by the 1x mode as most of the detail has to be blurred away to avoid aliasing. It's truly impressive how the iPhone 7 and 7 Plus are actually capable of keeping up with the Galaxy S7 despite a smaller sensor, and we're really seeing the product of Apple's ISP lead here.

Low Light Photography 1

It probably is worth mentioning here that in low light the iPhone 7 Plus doesn't actually use the secondary camera at all due to its smaller aperture and lack of image stabilization, which means that the iPhone 7 and 7 Plus are identical in low light performance. Interestingly enough detail is fairly comparable between the iPhone 6s Plus and iPhones 7, with some minor adjustment to favor more noise reduction. I'm inclined to say that the Galaxy S7 and iPhone 7 are basically comparable here but the oversharpening on the Galaxy S7 remains fairly obvious and I would expect it to outperform in detail here but it's just comparable to the iPhone 7 due to the rather smeary noise reduction. The HTC 10 is the clear winner here as far as detail goes but both the Galaxy S7 and HTC 10 really oversaturate the green shrubs while the iPhone 7 is much closer to what it should actually be. The oversaturated, smeary look that seems to dominate the Galaxy S7 output continues to be seriously off-putting for me.

Low Light Photography 2

It's interesting to see how Apple's noise and noise reduction seems to have changed from the 6 to 6s to 7 here. Detail is functionality identical but the iPhone 7 and 7 Plus clearly handle shadows better here as there's more detail and noise is controlled noticeably better with better detail and less visible noise. It's really impressive what Apple's processing is able to pull off here when sensor size and sensor technology hasn't really advanced that much from the iPhone 6s to iPhone 7. This is especially obvious when compared to the Galaxy S7, which has comparable overall detail but the noise reduction used is much more splotchy and has obvious oversharpening if you look too closely. Again, relative to the HTC 10 the sensor size deficit is very obvious here if you try to read the text on the trash cans, but the HTC 10's gamma and noise reduction algorithms are just not competitive in the shadows and it's obvious that there are uncorrected optical distortions in the light flares. The HTC 10 also tends to feel like it has a filter over the entire photo that makes it look a little soft compared to the iPhone 7 even if it does have better detail in some parts of the frame.

Low Light Photography 3

For whatever reason this scene always seems to at least mildly challenging. Here we can really start to see the softness that I'm talking about with the HTC 10, as the white pillar "bleeds" a bit into the brick wall exterior of Knudsen Hall. Detail on the iPhone 7 and 7 Plus remains comparable to the iPhone 6s Plus, but with noticeably less noise. The Galaxy S7 manages to deliver similar levels of detail to the iPhone 7, but it definitely oversaturates the red brick colors which might be appealing but really isn't accurate when you look at the RAW reference. The noise reduction on the Galaxy S7 is noticeably splotchier here and gets much worse if you look at the top right quarter of the photo. I would actually say the iPhone 7 outperforms just about everything here but the LG G5, which has better detail but a really strange color rendition.

Overall, the iPhone 7 camera is impressive and I would argue is holistically a better camera for still photos than the Galaxy S7 on the basis of more accurate color rendition, cleaner noise reduction, and lack of aggressive sharpening. It may not be as lightning fast as the Galaxy S7 or have as many party tricks, but what it does have is extremely well executed. The HTC 10 is definitely better than the iPhone 7 at delivering sheer detail when only comparing the 28mm focal length camera, but the post-processing has a tendency to bleed colors in low light which sometimes causes the images to look a bit soft. In daytime the iPhone 7 Plus' 56mm equivalent camera helps to keep it well ahead of the curve when it comes to sheer detail and really is a revelatory experience after years of using smartphone cameras that have focal lengths as short as 22mm and can't really capture what the eye sees. However, in low light the sensor size deficit really starts to become obvious. I suspect the Pixel and Pixel XL will make this especially clear. If there's really no room to go up the ladder in sensor size, Apple really needs to consider some radical approaches to improving sensor sensitivity such as RWB pixel layouts or using the dual camera for an oversampling scheme.

Camera Architecture and UX Video Performance
Comments Locked

377 Comments

View All Comments

  • solipsism - Monday, October 10, 2016 - link

    I'n the opposite of mkaibear. I prefer my iPhone but I have nothing against Android, WinPhone, or OEMs building devices for those OSes.

    I'm also glad to know what he uses and prefers. Wouldn't you want to know that I used an iPhone if I was reviewing an Android-based device?

    You can tell Brandon goes out of his way to be objective in his writing, even when decisions are somewhat opinion-based. This is not a gift that I see too often, so I appreciate it when I do.
  • mjh483 - Monday, October 10, 2016 - link

    Simple. Android vs iOS. Android can do things that iOS simply can't.
    Just because Android provides features that he needs doesn't mean he can't appreciate iOS.
    I think everyone needs to read the review carefully, because it's not like he is praising everything. He DID criticise the low resolution of the Retina display.
    And he gave logical reasons for things that he is impressed about. If you wanna refute that, then it's only right for you to come up with your own logical reasoning to back it up.
  • Infy2 - Monday, October 10, 2016 - link

    I am interested in the color space of the jpgs the camera produces, since the phone itself shows them in wider than sRGB. How will the jpgs be shown by color space aware programs and "normal" programs, like web browsers, that dont know anything about color profiles or color management?
  • Infy2 - Monday, October 10, 2016 - link

    Digging up shows the jpgs show color space as "[EXIF] ColorSpace: Uncalibrated" but they have embedded ICC P3 color space profile. Viewing the jpgs on Windows 10 with uncalibrated sRGB monitor (manufacturer's stock ICC profile installed though) shows very small difference in color intensity between color managed and non-color managed programs. Overall I dont see it as big issue that the world's most popular camera phone produces images in non-sRGB color space.
  • bw13121 - Monday, October 10, 2016 - link

    I'm hoping the deep-dive includes a section on the choice of modems. Whether the Intel or Qualcomm radios- the process technology, signal performance, power consumption and a list of supported radio bands themselves. There have been rumours that the Qualcomm radio in the non EU countries is on a newer process and supports more bands? Also, it is Cat 12 Vs Cat 10 Intel XMM7360.

    Thoughts anyone?
  • jlabelle2 - Wednesday, October 12, 2016 - link

    It makes little sense. Either the P3 ICC profile is embedded in the JPEG and only color profile aware software can show them properly (so very little on a Windows PC, and none on an Android or Windows phone) or it is not and the pictures will appear under saturated everywhere but some Apple devices / apps.
  • grayson_carr - Monday, October 10, 2016 - link

    Not sure about other browsers, but Safari supports proper color management and will display jpegs in their proper color space. I did notice that viewing iPhone 7 photos on an Android device makes them look far worse though because Android devices compress everything down to fit inside sRGB, making iPhone 7 photos look undersaturated on Android phones.
  • jlabelle2 - Wednesday, October 12, 2016 - link

    Yes but this is quite an exception. IE or Chrome or Edge for instance does not support reading the ICC profile of embedded image. Same for most software or app and same for ALL Android and Windows Mobile apps.
    Android is not "compressing anything". It just pass the RGB value to the screen.
    On a aRGB or P3 JPEG, a 100,0,0 pixel represents a more satured red than a 100,0,0 in sRGB color space.
    So if you display on a sRGB screen, without color management transforming the value to an equivalent one on the smaller color space, the colors will be displayed logically much less saturated.

    I ask already this question to Brandon on the iPad Pro review but never get answer on this very practical question. He mentioned future proof but TODAY, if really the pictures of the iPhone 7 are taken in a wider color space than sRGB, it is a big BIG issue as it means that you cannot basically share it to almost anyone (on 93% of Windows PC and Chromebook, on 85% of the mobile phones) because it will not be displayed properly.
    It seems so counterproductive that I have no idea why Apple would do that except to try cheating people making them believe of the advantage of their wider color gamut screen while the difference is mostly due to the color management issue (almost no real life pictures go beyond sRGB gamut).
  • Constructor - Monday, October 17, 2016 - link

    The way it should be working is this:

    • The camera shoots the picture in P3 color space and attaches the appropriate P3 profile to the picture, so any color-managed software knows precisely what the colors are supposed to look like.

    • On a display with a smaller color space the image color space will have to be compressed into the smaller space – you cannot see the colors as they actually were but only a less saturated, incorrect image but it will be fit into the smaller space as well as possible if color management is present, for instance preserving the color balance even if the display is just weak in blues or reds. If no color management is present, the image can become discolored on top of the compression, depending on the exact limitations of the display.

    • On a display with full P3 color space you see the colors from the P3 photo precisely as they actually were, exploiting the full gamut.

    • With a photo coming from a smaller color space such as sRGB, the color-managed P3 display would display this photo as it is supposed to look like, namely with its sRGB colors.

    Without color management the gamut would simply be blown up to full P3 gamut, incorrectly oversaturating the image.
  • jlabelle2 - Monday, October 24, 2016 - link

    "The way it should be working is this:"

    Well less and no. You are totally CORRECT on the behavior today: it seems to have been confirmed that the JPEG have the DCI-P3 color space embedded but I have not be able to find some iPhone 7 images that did not have sRGB instead...

    So if this is the case, it means, exactly as you said that basically more than 85% of the population (all Android and Windows PC/laptop/tablet users) will see the image wrong, desaturated because of the smaller gamut of their screen.

    Saying that what it should do is to implement it so that you can NOT share it with 86%+ of the population is ... weird.

    What Apple could have done is to let the user select this in the settings like every camera able to capture wider gamut than sRGB do. But no. It is Apple. So for the excuse of making things simple, they screw up the very vast majority of the population.

    The fact that it can be put by Anandtech in any positive way is really puzzling. Anand would have had better knowledge than that but he is not here anymore.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now