Still Image Performance

Now that we’ve discussed the basics of the iPhone 7 and 7 Plus camera we can start to get into how it actually performs relative to the iPhone 6s and 6s Plus as well the current competition on the market. While we normally run an ISO test to check spatial resolution this has been deferred to a future portion of the review. Unfortunately we don't really have the ability to do time-invariant testing here in a serious manner to the same extent that an OEM might, so we're effectively limited to tripod comparisons of real-world subjects.

Daytime Photography

In this kind of scenario the iPhone 7 and 7 Plus are directly comparable in the 1x mode. Because the primary camera has OIS and the secondary camera doesn't, it looks like it's fairly difficult for Apple to do an exact pixel to pixel correlation to the extent that the two outputs can be merged into a single image. As a result it's fairly obvious that the 1x mode has less detail than the 2x mode here. I can really see how this would be useful in general, as the longer focal length means more detail relative to anything else on the market but also allows for more interesting framing. The 1x camera is identical to the iPhone 7, and here it's definitely noticeable that the iPhone 7 can't quite keep up with the Galaxy S7 or HTC 10 in sheer detail in these kinds of shots.

Daytime Photography 2

In the interest of trying to not just take a single landscape photo and declare it to be a representative sample for all photos ever taken of all time with a smartphone in daytime conditions, I went ahead and took another sample shot of a mostly static subject. Here the iPhone 7 Plus in 1x mode is pretty much comparable to the iPhone 6s and Galaxy S7 as far as detail goes. I would argue that the HTC 10 captures slightly more detail at the center, but this probably isn't a surprise when the sensor is significantly larger. It's also worth noting that the iPhone 7 Plus manages to show better dynamic range here as the highlights off to the right retain more color detail than most devices tested and the shadows contain more detail that what is found on the Galaxy S7 or the iPhone 6s Plus. Once again, at 2x the iPhone 7 Plus is really just ridiculously good at capturing the sheer amount of detail that the tree has which isn't really captured by the 1x mode as most of the detail has to be blurred away to avoid aliasing. It's truly impressive how the iPhone 7 and 7 Plus are actually capable of keeping up with the Galaxy S7 despite a smaller sensor, and we're really seeing the product of Apple's ISP lead here.

Low Light Photography 1

It probably is worth mentioning here that in low light the iPhone 7 Plus doesn't actually use the secondary camera at all due to its smaller aperture and lack of image stabilization, which means that the iPhone 7 and 7 Plus are identical in low light performance. Interestingly enough detail is fairly comparable between the iPhone 6s Plus and iPhones 7, with some minor adjustment to favor more noise reduction. I'm inclined to say that the Galaxy S7 and iPhone 7 are basically comparable here but the oversharpening on the Galaxy S7 remains fairly obvious and I would expect it to outperform in detail here but it's just comparable to the iPhone 7 due to the rather smeary noise reduction. The HTC 10 is the clear winner here as far as detail goes but both the Galaxy S7 and HTC 10 really oversaturate the green shrubs while the iPhone 7 is much closer to what it should actually be. The oversaturated, smeary look that seems to dominate the Galaxy S7 output continues to be seriously off-putting for me.

Low Light Photography 2

It's interesting to see how Apple's noise and noise reduction seems to have changed from the 6 to 6s to 7 here. Detail is functionality identical but the iPhone 7 and 7 Plus clearly handle shadows better here as there's more detail and noise is controlled noticeably better with better detail and less visible noise. It's really impressive what Apple's processing is able to pull off here when sensor size and sensor technology hasn't really advanced that much from the iPhone 6s to iPhone 7. This is especially obvious when compared to the Galaxy S7, which has comparable overall detail but the noise reduction used is much more splotchy and has obvious oversharpening if you look too closely. Again, relative to the HTC 10 the sensor size deficit is very obvious here if you try to read the text on the trash cans, but the HTC 10's gamma and noise reduction algorithms are just not competitive in the shadows and it's obvious that there are uncorrected optical distortions in the light flares. The HTC 10 also tends to feel like it has a filter over the entire photo that makes it look a little soft compared to the iPhone 7 even if it does have better detail in some parts of the frame.

Low Light Photography 3

For whatever reason this scene always seems to at least mildly challenging. Here we can really start to see the softness that I'm talking about with the HTC 10, as the white pillar "bleeds" a bit into the brick wall exterior of Knudsen Hall. Detail on the iPhone 7 and 7 Plus remains comparable to the iPhone 6s Plus, but with noticeably less noise. The Galaxy S7 manages to deliver similar levels of detail to the iPhone 7, but it definitely oversaturates the red brick colors which might be appealing but really isn't accurate when you look at the RAW reference. The noise reduction on the Galaxy S7 is noticeably splotchier here and gets much worse if you look at the top right quarter of the photo. I would actually say the iPhone 7 outperforms just about everything here but the LG G5, which has better detail but a really strange color rendition.

Overall, the iPhone 7 camera is impressive and I would argue is holistically a better camera for still photos than the Galaxy S7 on the basis of more accurate color rendition, cleaner noise reduction, and lack of aggressive sharpening. It may not be as lightning fast as the Galaxy S7 or have as many party tricks, but what it does have is extremely well executed. The HTC 10 is definitely better than the iPhone 7 at delivering sheer detail when only comparing the 28mm focal length camera, but the post-processing has a tendency to bleed colors in low light which sometimes causes the images to look a bit soft. In daytime the iPhone 7 Plus' 56mm equivalent camera helps to keep it well ahead of the curve when it comes to sheer detail and really is a revelatory experience after years of using smartphone cameras that have focal lengths as short as 22mm and can't really capture what the eye sees. However, in low light the sensor size deficit really starts to become obvious. I suspect the Pixel and Pixel XL will make this especially clear. If there's really no room to go up the ladder in sensor size, Apple really needs to consider some radical approaches to improving sensor sensitivity such as RWB pixel layouts or using the dual camera for an oversampling scheme.

Camera Architecture and UX Video Performance
Comments Locked

377 Comments

View All Comments

  • ws3 - Tuesday, October 11, 2016 - link

    I have an iPhone 6 and I use headphones often. I would say that I have wanted to listen while charging maybe 2-3% of the times I have used headphones.

    It does happen, and it would be annoying those 2-3% of the times, but it's not common enough to be a deal breaker for me.

    Generally I use the headphones in the night and at the end of the day I almost always have around 30% battery on my phone which is good for 3+ hours of headphone use.
  • MadaMadaDesu - Wednesday, October 19, 2016 - link

    Well then stop buying phones with crappy battery life.
  • Ryan Smith - Tuesday, October 11, 2016 - link

    Unfortunately that review was a bit of a one-off. The equipment used there is not something we have access to, so we can't replicate the tests. But it's definitely something we'd like to do if we had the opportunity.
  • zeeBomb - Monday, October 10, 2016 - link

    Great review as always, and awesome footnotes between the differences in iOS and Android for optimization and performance.

    Hey, what do you guys mean when the iPhone is lacking in z-height? As in the top of where the iPhone sits on the top right corner or the portion where the lens stick out? The protrusion?
  • Constructor - Monday, October 17, 2016 - link

    It's not thick enough to support a longer focus and thus a larger lens, leading to less light on the sensor through the small lens and more noise in low-light situations.
  • fanofanand - Monday, October 10, 2016 - link

    I thought this was an excellent review, and the first review of any Apple product in a LONG time that didn't read like the author was angling for a job in Cupertino. The phone itself looks amazing (I will never buy an Apple product period, but let's be honest shall we?) and it sets a high bar for Android to compete against. It will be interesting to see what they come up with next year, because it looks like all they did this year was turn up clock speeds. They won't be able to do that again next year.
  • syxbit - Monday, October 10, 2016 - link

    "The latest generation of Android devices outpaced Apple's A9 SoC some time ago, so that's one area where Apple could stand to improve against the competition."

    Wow AnandTech has gone down hill. How can you make a statement like that without data. In what way has the A9 been outpaced? There are many things in the iPhone that could stand to improve, but the SoC is not one of them.
  • Brandon Chester - Monday, October 10, 2016 - link

    That statement was missing the specification of GPU performance, which is an area where 2016's Android devices did move past A9. I have amended the statement, and I apologize for the error, but I see no basis for jumping to the conclusion that "AnandTech has gone down hill" because two words were missing from a sentence.
  • RT81 - Monday, October 10, 2016 - link

    I use a Mac and an iPhone for my music production projects, so I enjoy the reviews on Apple stuff. However, you all have to admit, the Anandtech comment crowd isn't really the target audience for this stuff. These are people that grew up hating Apple because the only thing they really care about is benchmarks and raw power for gaming and they hold a grudge against Apple for marketing themselves as being the cool, trendy company.

    Paying more for a computer that is basically an appliance with a warranty is meaningless when all you care about is tinkering and min-maxing hardware for performance.

    As long as you guys continue to review Apple products, you all are going to have thicker skin.
  • RT81 - Monday, October 10, 2016 - link

    *going to NEED to have thicker skin

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now