Still Image Performance

Now that we’ve discussed the basics of the iPhone 7 and 7 Plus camera we can start to get into how it actually performs relative to the iPhone 6s and 6s Plus as well the current competition on the market. While we normally run an ISO test to check spatial resolution this has been deferred to a future portion of the review. Unfortunately we don't really have the ability to do time-invariant testing here in a serious manner to the same extent that an OEM might, so we're effectively limited to tripod comparisons of real-world subjects.

Daytime Photography

In this kind of scenario the iPhone 7 and 7 Plus are directly comparable in the 1x mode. Because the primary camera has OIS and the secondary camera doesn't, it looks like it's fairly difficult for Apple to do an exact pixel to pixel correlation to the extent that the two outputs can be merged into a single image. As a result it's fairly obvious that the 1x mode has less detail than the 2x mode here. I can really see how this would be useful in general, as the longer focal length means more detail relative to anything else on the market but also allows for more interesting framing. The 1x camera is identical to the iPhone 7, and here it's definitely noticeable that the iPhone 7 can't quite keep up with the Galaxy S7 or HTC 10 in sheer detail in these kinds of shots.

Daytime Photography 2

In the interest of trying to not just take a single landscape photo and declare it to be a representative sample for all photos ever taken of all time with a smartphone in daytime conditions, I went ahead and took another sample shot of a mostly static subject. Here the iPhone 7 Plus in 1x mode is pretty much comparable to the iPhone 6s and Galaxy S7 as far as detail goes. I would argue that the HTC 10 captures slightly more detail at the center, but this probably isn't a surprise when the sensor is significantly larger. It's also worth noting that the iPhone 7 Plus manages to show better dynamic range here as the highlights off to the right retain more color detail than most devices tested and the shadows contain more detail that what is found on the Galaxy S7 or the iPhone 6s Plus. Once again, at 2x the iPhone 7 Plus is really just ridiculously good at capturing the sheer amount of detail that the tree has which isn't really captured by the 1x mode as most of the detail has to be blurred away to avoid aliasing. It's truly impressive how the iPhone 7 and 7 Plus are actually capable of keeping up with the Galaxy S7 despite a smaller sensor, and we're really seeing the product of Apple's ISP lead here.

Low Light Photography 1

It probably is worth mentioning here that in low light the iPhone 7 Plus doesn't actually use the secondary camera at all due to its smaller aperture and lack of image stabilization, which means that the iPhone 7 and 7 Plus are identical in low light performance. Interestingly enough detail is fairly comparable between the iPhone 6s Plus and iPhones 7, with some minor adjustment to favor more noise reduction. I'm inclined to say that the Galaxy S7 and iPhone 7 are basically comparable here but the oversharpening on the Galaxy S7 remains fairly obvious and I would expect it to outperform in detail here but it's just comparable to the iPhone 7 due to the rather smeary noise reduction. The HTC 10 is the clear winner here as far as detail goes but both the Galaxy S7 and HTC 10 really oversaturate the green shrubs while the iPhone 7 is much closer to what it should actually be. The oversaturated, smeary look that seems to dominate the Galaxy S7 output continues to be seriously off-putting for me.

Low Light Photography 2

It's interesting to see how Apple's noise and noise reduction seems to have changed from the 6 to 6s to 7 here. Detail is functionality identical but the iPhone 7 and 7 Plus clearly handle shadows better here as there's more detail and noise is controlled noticeably better with better detail and less visible noise. It's really impressive what Apple's processing is able to pull off here when sensor size and sensor technology hasn't really advanced that much from the iPhone 6s to iPhone 7. This is especially obvious when compared to the Galaxy S7, which has comparable overall detail but the noise reduction used is much more splotchy and has obvious oversharpening if you look too closely. Again, relative to the HTC 10 the sensor size deficit is very obvious here if you try to read the text on the trash cans, but the HTC 10's gamma and noise reduction algorithms are just not competitive in the shadows and it's obvious that there are uncorrected optical distortions in the light flares. The HTC 10 also tends to feel like it has a filter over the entire photo that makes it look a little soft compared to the iPhone 7 even if it does have better detail in some parts of the frame.

Low Light Photography 3

For whatever reason this scene always seems to at least mildly challenging. Here we can really start to see the softness that I'm talking about with the HTC 10, as the white pillar "bleeds" a bit into the brick wall exterior of Knudsen Hall. Detail on the iPhone 7 and 7 Plus remains comparable to the iPhone 6s Plus, but with noticeably less noise. The Galaxy S7 manages to deliver similar levels of detail to the iPhone 7, but it definitely oversaturates the red brick colors which might be appealing but really isn't accurate when you look at the RAW reference. The noise reduction on the Galaxy S7 is noticeably splotchier here and gets much worse if you look at the top right quarter of the photo. I would actually say the iPhone 7 outperforms just about everything here but the LG G5, which has better detail but a really strange color rendition.

Overall, the iPhone 7 camera is impressive and I would argue is holistically a better camera for still photos than the Galaxy S7 on the basis of more accurate color rendition, cleaner noise reduction, and lack of aggressive sharpening. It may not be as lightning fast as the Galaxy S7 or have as many party tricks, but what it does have is extremely well executed. The HTC 10 is definitely better than the iPhone 7 at delivering sheer detail when only comparing the 28mm focal length camera, but the post-processing has a tendency to bleed colors in low light which sometimes causes the images to look a bit soft. In daytime the iPhone 7 Plus' 56mm equivalent camera helps to keep it well ahead of the curve when it comes to sheer detail and really is a revelatory experience after years of using smartphone cameras that have focal lengths as short as 22mm and can't really capture what the eye sees. However, in low light the sensor size deficit really starts to become obvious. I suspect the Pixel and Pixel XL will make this especially clear. If there's really no room to go up the ladder in sensor size, Apple really needs to consider some radical approaches to improving sensor sensitivity such as RWB pixel layouts or using the dual camera for an oversampling scheme.

Camera Architecture and UX Video Performance
Comments Locked

377 Comments

View All Comments

  • bw13121 - Monday, October 10, 2016 - link

    On the review suggestions, I'm very happy with them all. I would just suggest more of them and a real deep-dive on the A10! Let's see how them 3.3 Billion transistors outpower anything from the Android camp!
  • bw13121 - Monday, October 10, 2016 - link

    Also, to add to the comments on the review regarding the slow charge time, does a battery not last longer if it is charged slow as opposed to Fast charging/Qualcomm Quickcharge?

    The recent issue with Samsung phones could give an indication to the problem associated with fast charging, whether the FC compound or creates any battery issues?

    Can AT do another deep dive chemistry wise to compare battery longevity to include the quality of the battery, relative power density and the typical lifespan with the default charger?
  • Meteor2 - Tuesday, October 11, 2016 - link

    By 'last longer' I assume you mean overall lifespan, not the time a single charge lasts. Yes, you're certainly right -- fast charging diminishes the lifespan of lie ion batteries. I swap out fast chargers for 5W chargers for daily use, but keep the OEM 15+W charger plugged in somewhere in case I ever need a fast boost.

    'Tis true though, USB-C (I.e. really easy to put in) and quick charging largely does away with the need for wireless charging. At least that's my experience.
  • Meteor2 - Tuesday, October 11, 2016 - link

    Good advice.
  • Mumrik - Monday, October 10, 2016 - link

    "without a single mention of the deletion of the 3.5mm headphone jack, and that’s mostly because I think removing it doesn’t really matter after spending some time with AirPods, which really do remove a huge number of friction points from the user experience in a way that I didn’t even think about."

    I'm eternally surprised by the amount of people who happily use whatever headphones come with or are sold for their latest piece of technology.

    On my side of the universe, this is more like buying a bluray player and switching your entire TV because they removed HDMI from the player.
  • Seraphimcaduto - Monday, October 10, 2016 - link

    I didn't see anyone already ask the question, so I'll ask, for deep dive are you planning on at the difference that the amount of ram plays between the iPhone 7 and 7+? I remember it coming up during podcast 38 , there was no mention about it later so I thought I would ask great review overall it's why I keep coming back here in and waiting until you do a review before making that purchasing decision.
  • Ryan Smith - Tuesday, October 11, 2016 - link

    It's something we're looking into, though it's too early to say if we'll have anything conclusive.
  • df99 - Monday, October 10, 2016 - link

    As noted in an earlier comment, there is no mention whatsoever about the Qualcomm Modem X12 -- MDM 9645 and transceivers WTR 4905 and WTR 3925. The combination of the later two chips allows for combining of 3 data streams. There is mention of the WiFi interface in the hardware table but nothing mentioned of the LTE Qualcomm interfaces (CDMA versions of Verizon and Sprint) or the Intel Modem interfaces (AT&T and T-mobile). The Qualcomm modem is Cat 12 DL and Cat 13 UL.

    The Samsung S7 phones have 4 antennas to support 4x4 MIMO, 256 QAM (DL). To my knowledge, but I don't know for certain and it would be nice if Anandtech told us, there are not 4 antennas in the iPhone 7 so 4x4 MIMO can't be supported. 4x4 MIMO, 256 QAM allow for better signal reach than phones that don't support it. The Samsung S7 phones all use Qualcomm X12 modems as stated earlier, Apple has taken a shortcut and used the Intel modem on AT&T and T-mobile and the Intel modem lacks the 4x4 MIMO support and is a Category 9 modem.

    These chips and antennas make a difference for signal performance and I hope Anandtech goes into these very important details.

    In addition, as pointed out before, the iPhone 7 and Samsung S7 phones do not have the veer large spectrum AWS-3 (band 66) support. The newest LG phone, the V20 shipping later this month, does have AWS-3, band 66 support.

    I also would appreciate the testing of voice quality and noise background noise cancellation comparing the iPhone 7(+) with 6s(+) and Samsung S7.

    I have the iPhone 7+ on Verizon and I feel frustrated that Apple's iPhone for Verizon / Sprint which uses the Qualcomm X12 modem does not seem to have the 4 antennas and thus support for 4x4 MIMO and 256 QAM that the Samsung S7 provides. I wish there were more pride on Apple's part to ensure latest technology on the mission critical aspect of the phone (e.g., phones generally not useful if in need of 911 or other important call and can't get signal).

    Again, I'm not certain if the iPhone 7(+) does not have the 4 antennas and whether it can soon support 4x4 MIMO and 256 QAM, but I wish the review had mentioned this critical piece of information.
  • tempestglen - Monday, October 10, 2016 - link

    No SPEC2000 or SPEC06 result?
  • RdVi - Monday, October 10, 2016 - link

    Just to nit pick, you stated in the intro that the Galaxy S6 had a disadvantage of being thicker than the iPhone 6 which you attribute to the larger battery. The GS6 is actually 0.1mm(!) thinner than the iPhone 6.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now