Performance Metrics - II

In this section, we mainly look at benchmark modes in programs used on a day-to-day basis, i.e, application performance and not synthetic workloads.

x264 Benchmark

First off, we have some video encoding benchmarks courtesy of x264 HD Benchmark v5.0. This is simply a test of CPU performance. As expected, the lower turbo frequency of the Core i5-6200U and operation of the platform at its default TDP make the Beebox-S 6200U come in the lower half of the pack in this benchmark.

Video Encoding - x264 5.0 - Pass 1

Video Encoding - x264 5.0 - Pass 2

7-Zip

7-Zip is a very effective and efficient compression program, often beating out OpenCL accelerated commercial programs in benchmarks even while using just the CPU power. 7-Zip has a benchmarking program that provides tons of details regarding the underlying CPU's efficiency. In this subsection, we are interested in the compression and decompression MIPS ratings when utilizing all the available threads. Results are similar to what we observed for the video encoding case.

7-Zip LZMA Compression Benchmark

7-Zip LZMA Decompression Benchmark

TrueCrypt

As businesses (and even home consumers) become more security conscious, the importance of encryption can't be overstated. Hardware-acceleration for the same is available in the Core i5-6200U in the form of AES-NI support. TrueCrypt, a popular open-source disk encryption program can take advantage of the AES-NI capabilities, and it comes with an internal benchmark. In the graph below, we can get an idea of how fast a TrueCrypt volume would behave in the ASRock Beebox-S 6200U and how it would compare with other select PCs. This is a purely CPU feature / clock speed based test.

TrueCrypt Benchmark

Agisoft Photoscan

Agisoft PhotoScan is a commercial program that converts 2D images into 3D point maps, meshes and textures. The program designers sent us a command line version in order to evaluate the efficiency of various systems that go under our review scanner. The command line version has two benchmark modes, one using the CPU and the other using both the CPU and GPU (via OpenCL). The benchmark takes around 50 photographs and does four stages of computation:

  • Stage 1: Align Photographs
  • Stage 2: Build Point Cloud (capable of OpenCL acceleration)
  • Stage 3: Build Mesh
  • Stage 4: Build Textures

We record the time taken for each stage. Since various elements of the software are single threaded, others multithreaded, and some use GPUs, it is interesting to record the effects of CPU generations, speeds, number of cores, DRAM parameters and the GPU using this software.

Agisoft PhotoScan Benchmark - Stage 1

Agisoft PhotoScan Benchmark - Stage 2

Agisoft PhotoScan Benchmark - Stage 3

Agisoft PhotoScan Benchmark - Stage 4

Dolphin Emulator

Wrapping up our application benchmark numbers is the Dolphin Emulator benchmark mode results. This is again a test of the CPU capabilities, and the configuration of the Beebox-S platform unfortunately make it end up at the bottom of the lot.

Dolphin Emulator Benchmark

Performance Metrics - I Networking and Storage Performance
Comments Locked

30 Comments

View All Comments

  • dsraa - Wednesday, August 10, 2016 - link

    You're right, the link for newegg is a barebones unit for $319. Doesnt include anything.
  • Ro_Ja - Wednesday, August 10, 2016 - link

    Heh...We're talking about the NUC with the Skylake :)
  • Ro_Ja - Wednesday, August 10, 2016 - link

    The NUC's also good enough for gaming if you're not the type of maxing everything out at 1080P.
  • vailr - Wednesday, August 10, 2016 - link

    I think they stole the name from Jean-Louis Gassée:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BeBox
  • hojnikb - Thursday, August 11, 2016 - link

    > you would also be getting Intel QC.

    You means that "famous" intel QC, where they had to release numerous bios updates before the thing became useful ?
  • Samus - Wednesday, August 10, 2016 - link

    My only complaint is they cut costs using the Intel 3160 instead of the Intel 8260 (or even the older Intel 7260) which is ridiculous when you consider the 3160 and last-gen 7260 are virtually the same price.

    But at least they didn't use a 802.11n card. I can't believe how many of those I still see even in $1000 Thinkpad's and Elitebook's. Literally talking a few dollars in difference for improved range, performance and battery life going from 1x1 to 2x2.
  • u.of.ipod - Wednesday, August 10, 2016 - link

    I would love to see a review of the newest generation (and revision) of the Gigabyte Brix. The newest revisions have USB 3.1 (type c) ports and DDR4 RAM in addition to the Skylake CPUs
  • ganeshts - Wednesday, August 10, 2016 - link

    I have it in the queue, but I am waiting for a BIOS update : http://www.gigabyte.com/products/product-page.aspx... : Intel has made a bunch of fixes in the Skylake-U platform that are BIOS-related, and I want to evaluate with the most stable / recent platform Until GIGABYTE updates their BIOS with the fixes from Intel, I am not going to recommend the Skylake BRIX units.
  • tipoo - Wednesday, August 10, 2016 - link

    Still fixing it this long after Skylakes launch eh. What a mess. Kind of puts into perspective why there's no Macbook Pros with Skylake yet.
  • u.of.ipod - Saturday, August 13, 2016 - link

    Oh I didn't know there were problems with the Skylake BRIX units, I'll have to go re-read the Anandtech review.

    I just put together a simple Skylake BRIX i3 (the DDR3L version) for a friend using all open box parts from amazon. Seems to be humming right along for HTPC and emulator duties. I was considering upgrading my existing HTPC with one of the DDR4/USB C versions.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now