HTPC Credentials

The Beebox-S series, unlike the Braswell Beebox, does not have any fanless members. However, the noise profile is attractive enough for the unit to be used as a HTPC. Operation of the Core i5-6200U at its default TDP ensures that the fan doesn't need to spin as fast as what we have seen in other similar UCFF PCs (which configure the TDP up). However, given the specifications of the Intel HD Graphics 520, it is clear that the Beebox-S 6200U is more suited for the casual HTPC user, rather than someone who wants all the bells and whistles like customized renderers (madVR etc.). Based on this use-case, we evaluated refresh rate accuracy, over-the-top (OTT) streaming, and Kodi 16.1 for local media playback.

Refresh Rate Accurancy

Starting with Haswell, Intel, AMD and NVIDIA have been on par with respect to display refresh rate accuracy. The most important refresh rate for videophiles is obviously 23.976 Hz (the 23 Hz setting). As expected, the ASRock Beebox-S 6200U has no trouble with refreshing the display appropriately in this setting.

The gallery below presents some of the other refresh rates that we tested out. The first statistic in madVR's OSD indicates the display refresh rate.

Network Streaming Efficiency

Evaluation of OTT playback efficiency was done by playing back our standard YouTube test stream and five minutes from our standard Netflix test title. Using HTML5, the YouTube stream plays back a 720p encoding. Since YouTube now defaults to HTML5 for video playback, we have stopped evaluating Adobe Flash acceleration. Note that only NVIDIA exposes GPU and VPU loads separately. Both Intel and AMD bundle the decoder load along with the GPU load. The following two graphs show the power consumption at the wall for playback of the HTML5 stream in Mozilla Firefox (v 47.0.1).

YouTube Streaming - HTML5: Power Consumption

GPU load was around 20.01% for the YouTube HTML5 stream and 0.019% for the steady state 6 Mbps Netflix streaming case.

Netflix Streaming - Windows 10 Metro App: Power Consumption

Netflix streaming evaluation was done using the Windows 10 Netflix app. Manual stream selection is available (Ctrl-Alt-Shift-S) and debug information / statistics can also be viewed (Ctrl-Alt-Shift-D). Statistics collected for the YouTube streaming experiment were also collected here.

Unfortunately, the Beebox-S 6200U is not especially power efficient for OTT streaming. We did ensure that no stray processes were causing the high power consumption readings. Our guess is that some default BIOS setting is likely to be driving up the board power consumption (as we could see similar behavior in our load testing)

Decoding and Rendering Benchmarks

In order to evaluate local file playback, we concentrate only on Kodi 16.1 with default settings. We already know that EVR works quite well even with the Intel IGP for our test streams. In our earlier reviews, we focused on presenting the GPU loading and power consumption at the wall in a table (with problematic streams in bold). Starting with the Broadwell NUC review, we decided to represent the GPU load and power consumption in a graph with dual Y-axes. Nine different test streams of 90 seconds each were played back with a gap of 30 seconds between each of them. The characteristics of each stream are annotated at the bottom of the graph. Note that the GPU usage is graphed in red and needs to be considered against the left axis, while the at-wall power consumption is graphed in green and needs to be considered against the right axis.

Frame drops are evident whenever the GPU load consistently stays above the 85 - 90% mark. However, the Beebox-S 6200U has no trouble with our video benchmarking suite (as has become customary with all the mini-PCs that we have evaluated this year). Our suite is yet to integrate HEVC clips, but, we can get an idea of the decoding capabilities of the Beebox-S 6200U with the help of DXVA Checker.

Intel has already disclosed that the HEVC_VLD_Main10 10b decoding support in Skylake is hybrid in nature. If decoding such streams is a primary use-case, then, it is suggested that a more powerful PC be utilized. However, for most common 1080p use-cases, the Beebox-S 6200U is more than sufficient, and even a bit future-proof with the 4Kp60 HDMI 2.0 output.

Networking and Storage Performance Power Consumption and Thermal Performance
Comments Locked

30 Comments

View All Comments

  • Arnulf - Wednesday, August 10, 2016 - link

    Where is Apollo Lake?

    I want one of those on a desktop-sized motherboard (uATX?).
  • Ro_Ja - Wednesday, August 10, 2016 - link

    The Celerons and the Pentiums? They'll be better off with Compute Sticks.
  • maglito - Wednesday, August 10, 2016 - link

    Someone needs to make something like this with passive 24v 4wire Power over Ethernet or one of the active PoE standards that supports voltage in the 48v range. I have a NUC rigged up to run off of one of these switches: https://www.netonix.com/wisp-switch.html with this PoE extractor: http://tyconsystems.com/index.php/passive-gigabit/... (using 24VH mode on the switch) but it required a bit of cutting. There isn't really any good SFF PC with PoE input anywhere on the market I've found.
  • BedfordTim - Wednesday, August 10, 2016 - link

    On the plus side at least there are still NUCs that support 24V input.
  • MrCommunistGen - Wednesday, August 10, 2016 - link

    Wouldn't some of the Skylake NUC's performance advantage be related to the fact that the i5-6260U has 64MB of eDRAM?
  • ganeshts - Thursday, August 11, 2016 - link

    Very true. I had mentioned Iris graphics in the comparison table for the NUC6i5SYK, but didnt mention the eDRAM aspect in the text.
  • Wineohe - Thursday, August 11, 2016 - link

    I can appreciate the desire to test the unit in it's best light with a 950 Pro and the 16GB of RAM, but it seems like overkill and jacks up the price way up. You fail to even mention the base price, although I can go shopping. A more likely configuration for me is a mainstream 250gb SSD and 8GB. It would be perfect in my sailboat.
  • Jookie - Wednesday, August 17, 2016 - link

    I would love to see a NUC/UCFF that doesn't sandwich a hot WiFi adapter between the SSD and the MoBo. I usually don't install the WiFi if I care about the data on the drive.
  • Mathewlin - Thursday, August 25, 2016 - link

    Cool be good for my mom! :)
  • Detosx - Saturday, August 27, 2016 - link

    Another over-priced mini PC based around a low powered ultrabook-series CPU. Wouldn't it make more sense to buy an ultrabook laptop where a screen, keyboard, trackpad... memory and storage are included in the price?! I know it's a smaller footprint an ultrabook but I feel like potential customers are getting hammered on price, or certainly here in the UK. The NUC, with the much better Iris HD 540 graphics component, seems much more appealing, to me, but again the price is the big off putter and lack of things like a Thunderbolt 3 port limit the appeal of mini PCs, at the moment. If the price were much lower, I think the things it lacks would be less conspicuous by their absence. Thanks for the review. It would be nice to think it might spark some competition but here in price fixing UK, competition seems to be a dirty word. Hopefully the next generation will make for viably priced and appealing little gaming console alternatives.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now