Meet the GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition

We’ll start off our look at GeForce GTX 1060 cards with NVIDIA’s Founders Edition card. That there’s a retail reference card for GTX 1060 is actually a bit of a surprise here. NVIDIA has not consistently offered retail reference cards for the GTX x60 family over the years. These cards sell for lower margins, and with their lower TDP and overall simpler design, there’s simply not the same need or market for a retail reference design as with the higher end cards.

As a result, while the Founders Edition cards are a bit harder to swallow with the higher-end GeForces, here it makes a bit more sense. It’s essentially an NVIDIA exclusive design separate from the partner cards, albeit at a higher price. But perhaps more importantly, it’s one of the only two GTX 1060 blower designs being sold, which makes it a unique offering amidst the many open air designs on the market. Albeit one at $299, $50 over the base GTX 1060’s MSRP.

GeForce GTX 1060 Cards
  NVIDIA GTX 1060 Founders Ed. ASUS STRIX GTX 1060 OC
Base Clock 1506MHz 1620MHz
Boost Clock 1709MHz 1848MHz
Memory Clock 8Gbps GDDR5 8.2Gbps GDDR5
VRAM 6GB 6GB
Length 9.75" 11.75"
Width Double Slot Double Slot
Cooler Type Blower Open Air
Price $299 $314

In terms of styling, the GTX 1060 Founders Edition is designed to look like the higher end Founders Edition cards. This keeps a consistent look to the Founders Edition lineup, however a consistent look is also as far as the similarities go. Absent is the metal shroud of the high-end cards, replaced with a simpler plastic shroud, which is more along the lines of what you’d expect for a cheaper, lower TDP card. That said, even just handling the card makes it clear that NVIDIA took care to maintain a high build quality; the shroud is solid with no flimsiness or weak seams. Of all of the plastic NVIDIA blowers I’ve looked at over the years, this is likely the best, easily ahead of the reference GTX 680 and other efforts.

A lot of this has to do with the fact that while the shroud is plastic, NVIDIA has otherwise built the card like one of their higher-end cards, with plenty of fasteners and some metal – aluminum, I suspect – used at key points. Going under the hood also continues this analogy, as we find a metal baseplate running the length of the card, with an aluminum heatsink for the GPU covering much of the board.

The amusing bit is that the blower itself is larger than the card’s PCB due to the amount of space a blower needs for the fan and heatsink assemblies. The GTX 1060 PCB measures just 6.75” long – not too much longer than the PCIe x16 slot connector – while the shroud adds another 3” to that, bringing the total length to 9.8”. NVIDIA keeps the PCB and shroud flush with each other through some careful engineering with the overhanging part of the shroud, but it’s none the less an interesting sight when the cooler is larger than the board it needs to cool.

Looking at the PCB itself, what we find is a pretty typical design for a Gx106 card. NVIDIA has shifted the 3+1 phase power delivery circuitry to the front of the board, allowing the GPU and its associated GDDR5 RAM to be placed near the rear. Curiously, there are two empty GDDR5 pads here, despite the fact that GP106 and its 192-bit memory bus can only connect to 6 pads. From what I hear, this PCB is designed to accommodate GP104 as well (a potential third tier GP104 card, perhaps?), leading to the additional memory pads. In any case this is a simple but functional design, like previous NVIDIA reference PCBs before it.

Moving on, towards the top of the card we find the requisite power connector. NVIDIA’s reference PCB doesn’t actually place the 6-pin power connector on the PCB itself; rather it’s built into the shroud with an internal wire to carry it the rest of the way. This is an unusual design choice, as we haven’t seen this done before for cards with short PCBs. As far as I know there’s no technical reason NVIDIA needed to do this, but it does allow for the 6-pin connector to be placed at the far end of the card, which I imagine will please system integrators and others who are accustomed to short, minimally visible cable runs.

Meanwhile, looking at NVIDIA’s display I/O configuration, it’s physically unchanged from the other Pascal reference boards. This means we’re looking at 3x DisplayPort 1.4, 1x HDMI 2.0b, and 1x DL-DVI-D.

SLI Gets Removed

The one connector you won’t find on the GTX 1060 is the SLI connector. NVIDIA has been rethinking their SLI strategy for the Pascal generation, which as we’ve seen for GTX 1080/1070 has resulted in NVIDIA deprecating 3 and 4-way SLI support. GTX 1060 has not escaped this retooling either, with NVIDIA removing (or rather, not building in) most of their traditional SLI support.

Given the struggling state of multi-GPU scaling that I discussed in the GTX 1080 review, I had initially suspected that removing SLI support from the GTX 1060 was a further consequence of those scaling difficulties. However in discussing the matter with NVIDIA, they informed me that the rationale for this decision is based on economics more than technical matters. As it turns out, SLI is not used very often with GTX x60 class cards. Due to the aforementioned scaling issues there’s little reason to buy a pair of x60 cards right off the bat as opposed to a single x70/x80 card, and meanwhile by the time most customers were ready to upgrade again, it was 12+ months down the line, and buying a next generation card made would make more sense than doubling up on a now older card.

The end result is that NVIDIA has opted to remove SLI support for the GTX 1060 series, making the feature exclusive to the GTX 1070 and above. For customers looking for more performance this essentially locks them into following what has long been our own recommended path: buy the fastest card first (scale up), and then go SLI after that if you need more performance (scale out). As I noted before this is an economic decision – this was a feature that few people were using in this class of card – but at the same time it is a removed feature, so it’s also not really a positive thing. That said, in keeping with our traditional advice on multi-GPU I don’t consider SLI the best way to go with a mainstream card to begin with, so it’s not a feature I’m going to miss.

In any case, while NVIDIA has removed formal support for SLI from this class of product, it’s important to note that they haven’t removed multi-GPU support entirely. DirectX 12’s built in mGPU support supersedes SLI in some cases, so game developers can still offer multi-GPU support if they’d like. NVIDIA pulling SLI support only impacts scenarios where NVIDIA’s drivers were responsible for mGPU: games using DX11 or lower, and games using DX12’s implicit Linked Display Adapter (LDA) mode. Games that use explicit multi-adapter (e.g. Ashes of the Singularity) or explicit LDA can still setup mGPU. So multi-GPU on GTX 1060 isn’t truly dead, though I also don’t think we’re going to see too many game vendors bother to formally qualify a GTX 1060 mGPU setup regardless of what the API allows, since it’s going to be so uncommon.

The GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition & ASUS Strix Review Meet the ASUS ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1060 OC
Comments Locked

189 Comments

View All Comments

  • Notmyusualid - Sunday, August 7, 2016 - link

    Seems amazingly mis-priced.

    The lowest I see a GTX1060 for, on Amazon.co.uk is 260 GBP (delivered). That is $340 USD.

    The pound didn't fall that much.
  • silverblue - Monday, August 8, 2016 - link

    True, but what taxes go on top of that $250? As a Brit myself, that's out of genuine curiosity.
  • thesavvymage - Monday, August 8, 2016 - link

    Taxes vary by location, in my state, Washington, sales tax is almost 10% (which i think might be the highest sales tax) so it'd land around 275. UK prices include taxes, US dont, so the price premium isnt as much as you'd initially think
  • mdw9604 - Sunday, August 7, 2016 - link

    Why aren't the 1080 performance numbers included in the Charts? This thing cost about half as much, would expect about half the performance. But b/c they were not included, can't cant really come to that conclusion.
  • Ryan Smith - Monday, August 8, 2016 - link

    While the charts can handle more results, we're trying to keep things readable. If you want a 1080 comparison, Bench would be perfect for this.
  • mdw9604 - Monday, August 8, 2016 - link

    Thanks for taking the time to reply, will check it out. Would think it would be useful to include the newest high-end nvida graphics cards for perspective.
  • medi03 - Monday, August 8, 2016 - link

    Thanks for the review, Ryan.

    I've noticed difference in power consumption results between your and other sites (let's take TPU for example).

    You are testing total power consumption, which, given PSU's 80%-ish efficiency, should give bigger differences between cards, than if testing power consumption of GPU alone (pcie/connectors).

    On your site, ref 480 consumes 37 watt more than 1060.
    Ref 1070 consumes 6 watt more than 480.

    On TPU site (PCIe, "average gaming"):
    1) 480 consumes 47 watt more, which, taking 80% PSU efficiency in account, is 58.7 watt more
    2) 1070 consumes a bit less than 480

    (review is for an AIB, but I'm comparing Ref vs FE numbers)
    https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Palit/GeForce_...

    Any thought about why that might be? Can chips really vary that much? Is power consumption that different between different games?
  • Ryan Smith - Monday, August 8, 2016 - link

    "Can chips really vary that much?"
    Yes, especially since these cards are at times TDP limited .Move the temperature up or down by 5F and you'll get slightly different results with blowers, for example. That said...

    "Is power consumption that different between different games?"
    Absolutely. There can be a massive difference in the CPU load from the simulation, and on the GPU side there's the balance between texturing/shading/ROPing. We can't test all games, so with Crysis 3 we try to pick a game that offers a reasonable middle case. But if someone else uses a different game they can get very different results.
  • Greeba77 - Monday, August 8, 2016 - link

    Great review as always, however I was hoping this would also take in the recent benchmarks that have come out comparing the 1060 to the RX480 using Vulkan on Doom, in which I gather the Nvida card completely tanked. And of course whether this should have any bearing on any decision to buy anyway... if the regular performance is as clear cut as it looks then it seems the 1060 is a pretty good mid range upgrade choice for me (I have an R9 270X at the moment so it's a few generations old and this or an RX480 will smash it.)
  • beck2050 - Monday, August 8, 2016 - link

    Great card for the money when prices settle down. Early adopters always pay more for popular tech.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now