Crysis 3

Still one of our most punishing benchmarks 3 years later, Crysis 3 needs no introduction. Crytek’s DX11 masterpiece, Crysis 3’s Very High settings still punish even the best of video cards, never mind the rest. Along with its high performance requirements, Crysis 3 is a rather balanced game in terms of power consumption and vendor optimizations. As a result it can give us a good look at how our video cards stack up on average, and later on in this article how power consumption plays out.

Crysis 3 - 2560x1440 - Very High Quality + FXAA

Crysis 3 - 1920x1080 - Very High Quality + FXAA

Whereas Battlefield 4 was rather forgiving to the GTX 1060 at even 1440p, Crysis 3 is the opposite. While over 30fps, 42fps leaves a long way to go before hitting the all-important 60fps fluidity mark for this FPS. At 1080p on the other hand it has no trouble sustaining over 60fps. This does, however, end up being one of the only games where GTX 1060 isn’t neck-and-neck with GTX 980. Even the factory overclocked ASUS card is a bit off of GTX 980, though it’s still 4% ahead of the stock GTX 1060.

Compared to the GTX 1070 then, the GTX 1060 delivers fairly typical performance at 73% of its faster sibling. Versus GTX 960 this is a 71% performance gain, which is actually the smallest performance gain we’ll see throughout our entire benchmark suite. On which note, looking farther down the charts we have to compare GTX 1060 against GTX 660 to find a better than 2x performance increase.

Finally, against the RX 480, GTX 1060 once again delivers a 14% performance gain versus its closest competition.

Battlefield 4 The Witcher 3
Comments Locked

189 Comments

View All Comments

  • Raniz - Saturday, August 6, 2016 - link

    Good review, though I must say that calling it a review of a $249 MSRP card when neither of the cards actually reviewed has an MSRP of $249 is a bit weird.

    I think you should have at least one card that is actually priced at $249 in the review, even if the FE is supposed to be exactly the same as those cards.
  • Nephelai - Saturday, August 6, 2016 - link

    Never been a tin foil hat guy but I'm starting to believe nvidia is holding first borns on threat of including a GTX 980 TI or two in SLI in any review.
  • MarkieGcolor - Saturday, August 6, 2016 - link

    Yes! The GPU market is wacked
  • Sushisamurai - Saturday, August 6, 2016 - link

    I feel sorry for you Ryan. So much work out put in and yet there's still so many people that blast you and Anandtech as if you owe the vendors and readers "timely" reviews. Don't let it get to you guys - they'll still come and read just like I do, as your site offers something many don't.

    Anyways, back on topic, I feel the MRSP is a little BS In Canada, Newegg sells the products at ~$280 USD (1 SKU), with the Asus Strix @~$330 (other SKU's listed >$330). For $100 over the 480 in CAD (only reference boards available ATM) that 1060's perf/$ is too intense, almost priced at the next bracket (1070's only $50-$100 off the 1060 price, might as well get the 1070 then). Neat to see the 1060 #'s in action, too bad there's a limit on overvolting and TDP for over clocking.
  • IKeelU - Saturday, August 6, 2016 - link

    This review really needed some Doom vulkan to paint a more accurate picture of how these cards will perform in the future. I understand that Anandtech will expand on this review later on, but many of us are buying cards now (well, trying to at least).
  • Simplex - Sunday, August 7, 2016 - link

    I'd love to see more Vulkan based, but how realistic is it? How many games were announced to use Vulkan?
    How popular was Vulkan's predecessor (OpenGL) in the past?
  • Tech-Curious - Wednesday, August 10, 2016 - link

    Problem is that the nVidia optimizations for Doom Vulkan haven't even been attempted yet. You can find a bunch of reviews that show the 480 blowing the 1060 out of the water in Doom Vulkan, but we really don't know how representative those results are.

    Those results are very encouraging for the 480 though, just in general performance terms.
  • Tech-Curious - Wednesday, August 10, 2016 - link

    Correction, the quote I had in mind references async compute specifically. From Bethesda's Doom Vulkan FAQ:

    "Does DOOM support asynchronous compute when running on the Vulkan API?

    Asynchronous compute is a feature that provides additional performance gains on top of the baseline id Tech 6 Vulkan feature set.

    Currently asynchronous compute is only supported on AMD GPUs and requires DOOM Vulkan supported drivers to run. We are working with NVIDIA to enable asynchronous compute in Vulkan on NVIDIA GPUs. We hope to have an update soon."

    https://community.bethesda.net/thread/54585?tstart...
  • eddman - Saturday, August 6, 2016 - link

    Thanks for the review. I hope to see an HTPC review down the line, with a short 1060 or the upcoming 1050 (/Ti?).
  • jackbutler - Saturday, August 6, 2016 - link

    Could we please see a review of the new HEVC/H265 encoding performance of GTX1060 vs RX480?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now