Video Performance

Now that we've discussed how the HTC 10 does on still images we can go over how well it does for video recording. There have been a lot of cases where a smartphone can take great images but the video quality is often appalling and pretty much an afterthrought. In order to try and see how the HTC 10 does we can start by looking at the kind of encode settings that the HTC 10 uses.

HTC 10 Video Encode Settings
  Video Audio
1080p30 20 Mbps H.264 Baseline 192 Kbps, 48 KHz AAC
24 bit, 96 KHz FLAC
4K30 56 Mbps H.264 High Profile 192 Kbps, 48 KHz AAC
24 bit, 96 KHz FLAC
720p120 24 Mbps H.264 Baseline 192 Kbps, 48 KHz AAC

Right off the bat things are a little concerning here. For some reason HTC is using AVC Baseline for encode in 1080p30 and 1080p60 is absent altogether. I'm not sure why this is but really neither of those things should be the case. 720p120 also uses AVC Baseline which really shouldn't be the case. Interestingly enough, HTC has also included the ability to record video with FLAC audio which results in an mkv file output instead of an mp4 but as far as I can tell nothing else seems to change as far as video encode settings go.

1080p30 Video

In 1080p30 video HTC manages to pull off an interesting trick, which is that their video is actually properly stabilized instead of whatever is going on with the Galaxy S7 and G5. I would say that the color is also a little more accurate from what I saw at the time of recording but without a proper ColorChecker chart I can't really prove this assertion. At this point the HTC 10 and OnePlus 3 both have strange issues with artifacting around the sky that makes me wonder whether the Snapdragon 820 has some sort of issue with the encode blocks leading to such poor quality. Audio quality with FLAC is just clearly superior here though.

4K30 Video

In 4K30 the HTC 10 unfortunately loses the software stabilization so the result is basically just as shaky as the Galaxy S7 and by extension the Note7. Even using AVC High profile I can still see strange artifacts in the sky which is really strange. Audio capture continues to be better as far as suppressing wind noise goes than Galaxy S7, likely due to the use of dual level microphones similar to what we saw in the One M7. I would say color rendition is more accurate here as well but this is a subjective observation. The iPhones 6s continues to be one of the best phones for 4K30 capture almost entirely because it actually has the ISP throughput to process 4K video properly.

Slow Motion Video

In 720p120 the HTC 10 really starts to show its weakness. I suspect we're dealing with some kind of sensor limitation here because 4K30 is possible but for some reason 720p240 isn't. Color rendition is mildly cooler here as well relative to the Galaxy S7 but detail isn't great here and obviously it isn't going to be able to capture motion as well as anything with 240 FPS capture. The iPhone 6s would obviously beat it here by virtue of its 1080p120 capture.

Overall, video capture is somewhat disappointing on the HTC 10. It definitely isn't unusable and the FLAC audio is a compelling addition along with proper 1080p30 video stabilization, but things like poor slow motion capture and some strange artifacting and poor encode profiles mar the experience. Relative to something like the Galaxy S7 I would say that 1080p30 and 4K30 capture are clearly superior, but 720p120 and the utter lack of 1080p60 video means that depending upon what you use the camera for the HTC 10 can end up falling short of the competition. 720p240, 1080p60 for next year as well as AVC High Profile across the board would be great to see and would resolve a lot of the issues here.

Looking at the camera overall, I think the HTC 10 is very much the equal of the Galaxy S7 as far as camera goes. The Galaxy S7 and Note7 have incredible user experience due to the sheer speed of capture and focus, but the image quality, oil painting-esque processing, and somewhat off color rendition in a lot of cases means that the HTC 10 can give you a better result if you can tap to focus properly and possibly adjust the exposure metering. It definitely could use some work to clean up the details and loose ends, but HTC has finally shipped a camera that they can be proud of and lives up to the promise of the marketing and specs.

Still Image Performance Software UX: HTC Sense
Comments Locked

183 Comments

View All Comments

  • Jigolo - Monday, September 19, 2016 - link

    New wifi tests and WALT tests are awesome. Should be in every review they can be in.
  • Dennis Travis - Monday, September 19, 2016 - link

    Excellent review Josh. Great Job. Very impressed with the Camera.
  • 137ben - Monday, September 19, 2016 - link

    TOTALLY UNFAIR! The GNote 7 was reviewed on the day of its release, meanwhile it's been THREE WHOLE DAYS since the iPhone 7 was released and there is STILL NO IPHONE 7 REVIEW! This is blatant favoritism of Android! Everyone knows a review is worthless unless it is posted on the same day the product is released, WHY DOES ANANDTECH HATE APPLE SO MUCH?!?
  • fanofanand - Monday, September 19, 2016 - link

    This wasn't even good trolling. Back to the drawing board for you.
  • smorebuds - Monday, September 19, 2016 - link

    It sums up a lot of the comments here, though. I mean there are posts with relevant criticism, but they're drowned out by the seemingly obligatory "AT loves Apple more than Android" comments. The iPhone reviews are given the exact same time and priority as Samsung phones, and other devices that have that type of impact on the mobile market.
  • BillBear - Monday, September 19, 2016 - link

    This seems so familiar somehow.
  • Nickname++ - Monday, September 19, 2016 - link

    Hi Josh, I wouldn't care too much about the absolute RSRP reported by a device. Even in the cellular world the requirement on the absolute accuracy for RSRP are only +/- 6 dB at best (see 3GPP TS 36.133 section 9.1.2.1 for LTE intra frequency measurements for example). And cellular modem have typically stricter calibration and better accuracy than WiFi.

    So as a general rule, it's best not to rely on devices too much for RF channel absolute quality metrics. The reporting is still interesting, and relative changes are more accurate. But to compare different devices it's pretty much useless IMHO.
  • Zoomer - Monday, September 19, 2016 - link

    Certainly could be an explanation as to why it could maintain better throughput and the connection at lower rssi than the Samsung 820.
  • zer0hour - Monday, September 19, 2016 - link

    Yet another months late Anandtech review. Phones, especially flagships, have a yearly refresh schedule. When you post a review 5 months past a product's launch, that's nearly half of the lifecycle.

    I've been coming to this site for years, but the review cycle these days is getting seriously wonky to the point where the in-depthness of the review is NEARLY not worth it anymore. Have to call it as I see it.
  • meorah - Monday, September 19, 2016 - link

    oneplus 3 owner checking in. price on the HTC 10 is a non-starter. if I'm paying $200 more for a phone and camera is important to me I'm looking towards s7 edge or iphone 7 just for pure cpu/camera performance.

    HTC is stuck with low brand power, no gimmicks, broken promises, and squeezed by value and performance on both sides.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now