The AMD Radeon RX 480 Preview: Polaris Makes Its Mainstream Mark
by Ryan Smith on June 29, 2016 9:00 AM ESTGaming Performance
So with the basics of the architecture and core configuration behind us, let’s dive into some numbers.
Overall, AMD is pitching the RX 480 as a card suitable for 1440p gaming as well as 1080p gaming and VR gaming. In the case of 1080p the card is clearly powerful enough, as even Crysis 3 at its highest quality setting is flirting with 60fps. However when it comes to 1440p, the RX 480 feels like it’s coming up a bit short; other than DiRT Rally, performance is a bit low for the 60fps PC gamer. Traditionally cards in the $199-$249 mainstream range have been 1080p gaming cards, and in the long run I think this is where RX 480 will settle at as well.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
449 Comments
View All Comments
fanofanand - Thursday, June 30, 2016 - link
Amazing that you have managed to purchase a card no one has for sale. Not Newegg, not Amazon, go ahead and tell us all where you were able to procure an unreleased card?catavalon21 - Wednesday, July 13, 2016 - link
"2 RX 480s probably beat a single 1070 while consuming twice the power"Actually, very close to double the power in a particular gaming selection (87% more was their assessment)
http://www.hardocp.com/article/2016/07/11/amd_rade...
slickr - Thursday, June 30, 2016 - link
The only people who care and cared about power consumption, whether its 150W or 170W were/are the paid and bought for shills who write for Nvidia and who commit fraud and scam against their readers, they are committing crimes.Nvidia won because of the shills.
D. Lister - Thursday, June 30, 2016 - link
You get it man, you've got it all figured out! Yours is the level of comprehension that lesser men like myself strive for all their lives, and still fall short by miles. To hell with trivialities like hardware components, a mind like yours should be tackling questions like "the meaning of life" and whatnot.fanofanand - Thursday, June 30, 2016 - link
A+ on the hyperbole (is your name an homage to Dean Lister, the MMA fighter?) but his original statement isn't entirely wrong. Few desktop users will notice the difference between 150 watts and 170 watts. I don't know about the tinfoil hat stuff, but the original premise isn't completely invalid.D. Lister - Friday, July 1, 2016 - link
"is your name an homage to Dean Lister, the MMA fighter?"Actually it is an homage to "David 'Dave' Lister", from the "Red Dwarf" books. :)
"Few desktop users will notice the difference between 150 watts and 170 watts. I don't know about the tinfoil hat stuff, but the original premise isn't completely invalid."
The thing is, no one terribly cares for the 480 slightly overshooting the TDP. The thing they're complaining about is AMD's choice to stick on a 6-pin connector on the ref card, instead of an 8-pin one, which forces the card to compensate by over-drawing from its slot. Nonetheless, I was really more concerned about the tinfoil hat stuff.
andrewaggb - Thursday, June 30, 2016 - link
Nah, power consumption is a big deal to some people. I agree that 150W vs 170W is nothing, but pulling an extra 100W or more for the same performance isn't great. It's heat that ends up in the room with you, it's bigger heatsinks or faster fans etc.In laptops power consumption is everything. AMD needs to get it under control, simple as that. I think the RX 480 and 470 will be fine, but if they are already pulling 1070 numbers what will Vega pull? It'll probably use HBM2 and get power savings there, but what about the GPU itself?
jayfang - Thursday, June 30, 2016 - link
Nice, something that makes sense to replace my HD 6850 with.Intel / AMD please step up - still rocking i5-2500K
drgigolo - Thursday, June 30, 2016 - link
Where is the GTX 1080 review? Or 1070 for that matter.cocochanel - Thursday, June 30, 2016 - link
You didn't read all the comments. It's coming out in a few days.