First Thoughts

Bringing our first look at AMD’s new architecture to a close, it’s exciting to see the field shape up for the FinFET generation. After over four years since the last great node transition, we once again are making a very welcome jump to a new manufacturing process, bringing us AMD’s Polaris.

AMD learned a lot from the 28nm generation – and more often than not the hard way – and they have put those lessons to good use in Polaris. Polaris’s power efficiency has been greatly increased thanks to a combination of GlobalFoundries 14nm FinFET process and AMD’s own design choices, and as a result, compared to AMD’s last-generation parts, Polaris makes significant strides where it needs to. And this goes not just for energy efficiency, but overall performance/resource efficiency as well.

Because AMD is launching with a mainstream part first they don’t get to claim to be charting any new territory on absolute performance. But by being the first vendor to address the mainstream market with a FinFET-based GPU, AMD gets the honor of redefining the price, performance, and power expectations of this market. And the end result is better performance – sometimes remarkably so – for this high volume market.

Relative to last-generation mainstream cards like the GTX 960 or the Radeon R9 380, with the Radeon RX 480 we’re looking at performance gains anywhere between 45% and 70%, depending on the card, the games, and the memory configuration. As the mainstream market was last refreshed less than 18 months ago, the RX 480 generally isn’t enough to justify an upgrade. However if we extend the window out to cards 2+ years old to things like the Radeon R9 280 and GeForce GTX 760, then we have a generational update and then-some. AMD Pitcairn users (Radeon HD 7800, R9 270) should be especially pleased with the progress AMD has made from one mainstream GPU to the next.

Looking at the overall performance picture, averaged across all of our games, the RX 480 lands a couple of percent ahead of NVIDIA’s popular GTX 970, and similarly ahead of AMD’s own Radeon R9 390, which is consistent with our performance expectations based on AMD’s earlier hints. RX 480 can't touch GTX 1070, which is some 50% faster, but then it's 67% more expensive as well.

Given the 970/390 similarities, from a price perspective this means that 970/390 performance has come down by around $90 since these cards were launched, from $329 to $239 for the more powerful RX 480 8GB, or $199 when it comes to 4GB cards. In the case of the AMD card power consumption is also down immensely as well, in essence offering Hawaii-like performance at around half of the power. However against the GTX 970 power consumption is a bit more of a mixed bag – power consumption is closer than I would have expected under Crysis 3 –  and this is something to further address in our full review.

Finally, when it comes to the two different memory capacities of the RX 480, for the moment I’m leaning strongly towards the 8GB card. Though the $40 price increase represents a 20% price premium, history has shown that when mainstream cards launch at multiple capacities, the smaller capacity cards tend to struggle far sooner than their larger counterparts. In that respect the 8GB RX 480 is far more likely to remain useful a couple of years down the road, making it a better long-term investment.

Wrapping things up then, today’s launch of the Radeon RX 480 puts AMD in a good position. They have the mainstream market to themselves, and RX 480 is a strong showing for their new Polaris architecture. AMD will have to fend off NVIDIA at some point, but for now they can sit back and enjoy another successful launch.

Meanwhile we’ll be back in a few days with our full review of the RX 480, so be sure to stay tuned.

Power, Temperature, & Noise
Comments Locked

449 Comments

View All Comments

  • AntDX316 - Thursday, June 30, 2016 - link

    NVidia was talking about releasing the 1080 GTX for laptop instead of 1080M because they were scared AMD was going to come out big.

    The hope for massive gains are a lower expected price point is gone and the money milking will continue.
  • sonicmerlin - Friday, July 1, 2016 - link

    AMD has again ceded the entire laptop market to Nvidia thanks to these horribly inefficient cards.
  • medi03 - Thursday, June 30, 2016 - link

    Comparing it to different tier card of current gen is childish or plain stupid, if coming from grown up.

    Performance is right on track.
    Power consumption is disappointing, although not a problem for this tier.

    I'm curios what it is caused by, could well be Samsung 14nm vs Glofo 16nm. I recall Apple's chips from Samsung were consuming more power than from TSMC, despite that one would expect it to be other way round.
  • cocochanel - Thursday, June 30, 2016 - link

    In what world do you live ? Here in Canada, the Nvidia GTX 1080 sells for over 900 dollars Canadian !! The GTX 1070 is over 600 dollars. An RX480 with 8 Gigs of RAM it's about 300 dollars.
    I'll get one for Christmas and that leaves me plenty of change to buy an Oculus Rift set. How is that such a F-up ?
    The stupidity on your behalf is astounding.
  • cocochanel - Thursday, June 30, 2016 - link

    RX480 + Oculus Rift Set = GTX1080. Pricewise. That's a good F-up for me. Christmas is looking good.
  • steamerSama - Thursday, June 30, 2016 - link

    Many people have this twisted expectation. That a 200$ card will outperform something twice its cost is ridiculous. AMD has made a blunder, yes, by not releasing their flagship 490 first and come up with economy class 480. But other than that, if you were expecting a better performance than this, you were perhaps being sucked in by the hype
  • loguerto - Wednesday, June 29, 2016 - link

    Let's see how all of this nice stuff transforms into performance ...
  • rtho782 - Wednesday, June 29, 2016 - link

    I think at this point I'd be more shocked had you posted a full review ;)

    So we're now waiting on GTX 960, GTX 1080/70, and RX 480....
  • justaviking - Wednesday, June 29, 2016 - link

    We now have TWO QUESTIONS to ask every time a new GPU comes out:
    1) Can it play Crysis?
    2) Where is the full GTX 1080 review?
  • Ryan Smith - Wednesday, June 29, 2016 - link

    "2) Where is the full GTX 1080 review?"

    The full RX 480 review will be in a few days. The full GTX 1080 review will be a couple of days after that. RX 480 would have been a full review today, but I managed to slice myself with the RX 480 on Tuesday and needed to resolve that first...

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now