First Thoughts

Bringing our first look at AMD’s new architecture to a close, it’s exciting to see the field shape up for the FinFET generation. After over four years since the last great node transition, we once again are making a very welcome jump to a new manufacturing process, bringing us AMD’s Polaris.

AMD learned a lot from the 28nm generation – and more often than not the hard way – and they have put those lessons to good use in Polaris. Polaris’s power efficiency has been greatly increased thanks to a combination of GlobalFoundries 14nm FinFET process and AMD’s own design choices, and as a result, compared to AMD’s last-generation parts, Polaris makes significant strides where it needs to. And this goes not just for energy efficiency, but overall performance/resource efficiency as well.

Because AMD is launching with a mainstream part first they don’t get to claim to be charting any new territory on absolute performance. But by being the first vendor to address the mainstream market with a FinFET-based GPU, AMD gets the honor of redefining the price, performance, and power expectations of this market. And the end result is better performance – sometimes remarkably so – for this high volume market.

Relative to last-generation mainstream cards like the GTX 960 or the Radeon R9 380, with the Radeon RX 480 we’re looking at performance gains anywhere between 45% and 70%, depending on the card, the games, and the memory configuration. As the mainstream market was last refreshed less than 18 months ago, the RX 480 generally isn’t enough to justify an upgrade. However if we extend the window out to cards 2+ years old to things like the Radeon R9 280 and GeForce GTX 760, then we have a generational update and then-some. AMD Pitcairn users (Radeon HD 7800, R9 270) should be especially pleased with the progress AMD has made from one mainstream GPU to the next.

Looking at the overall performance picture, averaged across all of our games, the RX 480 lands a couple of percent ahead of NVIDIA’s popular GTX 970, and similarly ahead of AMD’s own Radeon R9 390, which is consistent with our performance expectations based on AMD’s earlier hints. RX 480 can't touch GTX 1070, which is some 50% faster, but then it's 67% more expensive as well.

Given the 970/390 similarities, from a price perspective this means that 970/390 performance has come down by around $90 since these cards were launched, from $329 to $239 for the more powerful RX 480 8GB, or $199 when it comes to 4GB cards. In the case of the AMD card power consumption is also down immensely as well, in essence offering Hawaii-like performance at around half of the power. However against the GTX 970 power consumption is a bit more of a mixed bag – power consumption is closer than I would have expected under Crysis 3 –  and this is something to further address in our full review.

Finally, when it comes to the two different memory capacities of the RX 480, for the moment I’m leaning strongly towards the 8GB card. Though the $40 price increase represents a 20% price premium, history has shown that when mainstream cards launch at multiple capacities, the smaller capacity cards tend to struggle far sooner than their larger counterparts. In that respect the 8GB RX 480 is far more likely to remain useful a couple of years down the road, making it a better long-term investment.

Wrapping things up then, today’s launch of the Radeon RX 480 puts AMD in a good position. They have the mainstream market to themselves, and RX 480 is a strong showing for their new Polaris architecture. AMD will have to fend off NVIDIA at some point, but for now they can sit back and enjoy another successful launch.

Meanwhile we’ll be back in a few days with our full review of the RX 480, so be sure to stay tuned.

Power, Temperature, & Noise
Comments Locked

449 Comments

View All Comments

  • Yojimbo - Thursday, June 30, 2016 - link

    What monopoly concerns? It's not illegal to have a monopoly, it's illegal to abuse a monopoly. other than that a monopoly position can affect regulatory rulings concerning mergers and acquisitions, but I doubt NVIDIA has any ambition to make a purchase of a GPU maker, so I doubt they would have any regulatory concerns. The important reason NVIDIA won't try to drive AMD out of the market is because they are interested primarily in increasing their profits and not with driving AMD out of the market. If NVIDIA can get 95% market share and maintain their profit margins they would be very happy, unconcerned with having "too much market share", providing they could achieve it without engaging in uncompetitive practices.
  • cocochanel - Thursday, June 30, 2016 - link

    I never knew Nvidia to be much concerned about monopolies. Over the years, my impression was that they only care about profit margins. And they are good at it.
  • Yojimbo - Thursday, June 30, 2016 - link

    Yes the RX 480 may have a cost advantage over the GTX 970, but the point is that AMD doesn't have the market completely to themselves since the RX 480's advantage over the GTX 970 is dubious. NVIDIA may have smaller profit margins in the space but it's not like they are uncompetitive in the space. The GTX 1060 will arrive soon enough to restore NVIDIA's profit margins. In the mean time inventories of the GTX 970 can be flushed out of the system for a profit.
  • Questor - Wednesday, June 29, 2016 - link

    "When can we get downvote buttons on AT comments?"

    I get your point, really I do! Be careful what you ask for. Heaven forbid you should say anything of merit over at TH. The foundations of civilization shake when you question a review(er) and the fanboys rules supreme with their mouse cursor over those little clickable arrows. You can say something that is completely true, accurate, responsible and even polite, but beware should you offend a minion! They and their brethren will pounce upon your words of wit and wisdom with the fury the scorned. Your post, feelings, opinions, facts, questions and whatever else you said, will be buried so deep, not even Hades will be able to dig it up!
  • JoeyJoJo123 - Wednesday, June 29, 2016 - link

    You can go back to reddit and enjoy your inner-circle and upboat eachother to make yourselves feel good.

    Proper internet forums of speech aren't saddled by prominently displaying the most popular opinion. Everyone's post should be equally as worthless.
  • AntDX316 - Thursday, June 30, 2016 - link

    How do you get a blue post?
  • pashhtk27 - Thursday, June 30, 2016 - link

    "Everyone's post should be equally as worthless."
    Nice. ;)
  • ddriver - Wednesday, June 29, 2016 - link

    The rx480 is targeted in the market niche that has the best sales to profit margins ratio. It is about as fast as the gtx970, but is more efficient and better performing at new and upcoming games (vulkan, actual dx12 (not dumb ports)). In property optimized games (I mean not games nvidia pays to be left unoptimized for radeons) it is as fast as the r9 nano.

    I'd say job well done. A very efficient and well targeted launch. It would not be possible to do any better given amd's lack of resources, any higher expectations would be unrealistic and the product of genuine cluelessness or fanboyism.
  • smilingcrow - Wednesday, June 29, 2016 - link

    More efficient by a negligible margin but it is good value; a Radeon Lidl 480. :)
  • sonicmerlin - Friday, July 1, 2016 - link

    Really? AMD advertised a 2.8x increase in performance per watt with Polaris. The card massively failed AMD's own expectations.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now