Final Words

The Meizu PRO 5 was released towards the end of 2015, and it’s tempting to dismiss it now that we have a new generation of phones to choose from. Meizu even added a new member to the PRO family in the form of the PRO 6 recently, released only about half a year after the PRO 5. For now though, Meizu will continue to sell the PRO 5 alongside the PRO 6, which makes some sense. The two phones use different size 1080p SAMOLED displays, 5.7-inch for the PRO 5 and 5.2-inch for the PRO 6, giving customers different size options, and the PRO 5 will of course be less expensive. Even when compared to newer phones in its price range, like the just recently announced OnePlus 3, the PRO 5’s specifications still hold up pretty well.

When the PRO 5 first appeared, its Exynos 7420 SoC was the highest performing silicon available for Android phones. Since that time, a whole new generation of SoCs were introduced, including HiSilicon’s Kirin 950/955, Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 820, and Samsung’s Exynos 8890, that offer better performance at least in some metrics; however, the older Exynos 7420 is still very capable, especially for general system tasks that rely on the CPU. It helps the PRO 5 keep pace in our web-based JavaScript tests, and with the help of the PRO 5’s fast UFS 2.0-based internal storage and whatever software tweaks FlymeOS includes, gives the PRO 5 some of the fastest times for launching and switching between apps. Its GPU cannot match the peak performance of newer parts, but it’s still fast enough for current games. Overall, the PRO 5 still feels like a modern flagship phone.

The PRO 5’s high-resolution 21MP rear camera captures nicely detailed images and generally handles exposure and white balance well, although it leans towards brighter exposures in medium-light scenes. In good lighting, the PRO 5’s image quality is competitive with other flagship phones. And while its image noise is average for a phone camera, the lack of OIS keeps it from matching the low-light performance of more expensive phones such as the Galaxy S7. Unfortunately, the PRO 5’s HDR mode is disappointing, making overexposed areas worse and greatly exaggerating colors.

The PRO 5’s greatest strength, and what really sets it apart, is its great-sounding audio. While its external speaker seems better tuned for voice calls and movie dialogue rather than music, its headphone output is the best I’ve ever heard. Inside the PRO 5 are two distinct headphone audio circuits: one path is similar to what’s found in most smartphones, but the second path, which Meizu dubs “Hi-Fi Sound 2.0,” includes higher-quality hardware that sounds better and is even capable of driving higher-impedance headphones.

No smartphone is perfect, however. The PRO 5’s weak point is its 5.7-inch SAMOLED display, whose 1080p resolution is low enough that some people will be able to notice the limitations of its PenTile pixel configuration. The panel’s maximum brightness is also pretty low even for OLED, and while the PRO 5’s grayscale and color accuracy are not the worst we’ve seen, it’s definitely not in the same league as Samsung’s Galaxy phones or Motorola’s Moto X Pure Edition.

The PRO 5 comes with Flyme 5.1, Meizu’s custom skin that runs on top of Android 5.1. We discussed the previous version of FlymeOS in our review of the Meizu MX4 Pro. The current version has a cleaner, more modern Android appearance. As is typical for Chinese OEM skins, Flyme does not include an app drawer. The usual Android back and recent apps buttons are also missing. Instead of physical or onscreen buttons, the PRO 5’s home button doubles as a capacitive button that can be assigned several different functions, although using it as a back button is an obvious choice. Swiping up from the bottom bezel brings up the recent apps menu. Personally, I find swiping far easier and more intuitive than pressing buttons on a smartphone, so I really like Flyme’s use of a swipe gesture for this common function. I really wish all Android phones used this method.

Flyme also supports lock screen gestures, including the ability to double-tap to light up the screen and swipe horizontally to change music tracks. You can also create shortcuts that automatically launch apps of your choosing by drawing letters on the lock screen. There’s also a persistent SmartTouch joystick button that’s always visible (opacity is adjustable) that can be assigned different tasks. For example, it can work as a back button by tapping it, an app switcher by swiping left or right, and will pull down the notification shade by swiping down, a useful feature if you cannot reach the top of the screen with one hand.

Flyme needs some additional polish, however. While it did not affect the limited number of apps I tried, the DVFS bug when using the PRO 5’s Performance power mode, which causes erratic performance in PCMark, could interfere with third-party app performance. The camera app’s inability to rotate the UI into landscape mode and lack of an HDR toggle on the main screen are additional examples. Fortunately, most of the Chinese translation problems have been cleaned up in the international version of FlymeOS, which are still prevalent when using English in the China specific version (shown below).

Despite a few shortcomings, I rather like the PRO 5. Sure, without LTE support and an OS that’s not tailored to western conventions, it’s not the best choice for North American customers. But it’s still a viable option for other markets depending on price. The PRO 5’s good performance, decent camera, and average battery life keep it competitive with other phones in this price range. A great fingerprint sensor and excellent audio help it stand out. The only thing really holding it back from being a great phone is the display and a general lack of polish in areas like the camera processing.

Battery Life & Audio Quality
Comments Locked

80 Comments

View All Comments

  • Azurael - Friday, June 24, 2016 - link

    "The other four phones in this roundup all have OIS and lower resolution sensors. The Mate 8 uses a 16MP Sony IMX298 Exmor RS sensor, while the iPhone 6s Plus, Nexus 6P, and Galaxy S7 all use different 12MP Sony sensors."

    I had to keep going over that that to make sure I wasn't misreading. I'm fairly certain the Nexus 6P doesn't have OIS...
  • Matt Humrick - Friday, June 24, 2016 - link

    You're right. The Nexus 6P does not have OIS. I've updated the paragraph in the review.
  • Spectrophobic - Saturday, June 25, 2016 - link

    I almost thought Anandtech will finally include audio measurements on their phone reviews...
    Not really a fan of subjectively describing the sound of DACs and amps.
  • Impulses - Saturday, June 25, 2016 - link

    There's a place for both IMO, numbers will never tell the whole story when it comes to audio gear, at least not until we get a lot better at measuring things AND interpreting measurements. Review sites like Innerfidelity have proven this time and again IMO...

    FWIW AT did include audio measurements for a brief stint when they had some loaner gear, but they don't have access to it anymore and even if they did not every smartphone reviewer would... It's definitely something I'd love to see but the logistics seem tough to figure out.
  • paradox_cat - Saturday, June 25, 2016 - link

    can we please have a HTC 10 review? I'd be interested particularly to see how the sound quality on that compares to this Meizu Pro 5
  • Badelhas - Saturday, June 25, 2016 - link

    I would love to read AnandTechs detailed and rigorous full review of the HTC 10 as well but I still like to see these Chinese smartphones reviews as well. Just because I can't buy them except if I import them dosent mean that are a very important part of the competition
  • BMNify - Saturday, June 25, 2016 - link

    Thanks for the review Matt, waiting for Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 and and Mi5. Also try to get the samples for LeEco Le Max2 and LeEco Le2.

    We are getting all these interesting phones here in India at awesome prices and need a good English review site and you already know you have a sizable Indian readership. Besides, These companies are launching in new markets every few months, so the readership for these devices will only increase in the future.
  • Valantar - Saturday, June 25, 2016 - link

    Another more or less baffling phone review from AnandTech. Not that it isn't slightly interesting to read about uncommon devices and new configurations of known hardware, but given that AT is still missing reviews of all current high end phones save the G5 and the latest iPhone, this is an odd one.

    Especially given that this device - as stated in the review - won't be very relevant outside of China due to lack of LTE support, this makes me wonder if AT is under some sort of pressure to grow their reader base in China/eastern Asia.

    Sure, S7 reviews are a dime a dozen, but none with the technical knowledge and depth of AT reviews. I also get that most AT editors work part time alongside other, time-consuming engagements (like studies), but that's not really an excuse for ever-increasing lateness. If your current editors are overworked, hire more.
  • m0rdy - Saturday, June 25, 2016 - link

    I really don't mind that anandtech's reviews are late, because they're more in depth than any other reviews. Display and colors are SO important to a smartphone, but NO ONE ELSE seems to recognise it and test it as well as Anandtech (not even the manufacturers) ! That's what keeps me coming here. I only wish that the breadth of reviews were greater (i.e. more smartphones)
  • fuicharles - Sunday, June 26, 2016 - link

    I also don't mind that anadtech review being late, given it is more in depth, but please don't be too late.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now