Camera Hardware

The PRO 5’s rear camera uses a Sony IMX230 Exmor RS sensor that captures up to 21MP images with a 4:3 aspect ratio. This is the same sensor used in Motorola’s Moto X Pure Edition, which takes nice pictures in good lighting but struggles a bit in lower-light scenes—partly because of software processing and partly from a lack of optical image stabilization (OIS). The PRO 5 also lacks OIS. We’ll see how this impacts its low-light performance in the next section.

The rear camera’s strength is its hybrid autofocus system that combines phase detect autofocus (PDAF)—using up to 192 AF points on the Sony sensor—laser autofocus, and traditional contrast-based AF as a fallback to provide fast, reliable focusing under a range of lighting conditions. This is still a rare feature; most phones, even the most expensive flagships from Apple and Samsung, only combine two AF methods, either PDAF/contrast or laser/contrast. But combining PDAF and laser makes sense: PDAF works well at longer distances and in good lighting, while laser works well at short distances and in poor lighting.

Camera Architecture
  Meizu PRO 5
Front Camera: Resolution 5MP
Front Camera: Sensor OmniVision OV5670
(1.12µm, 1/5")
Front Camera: Focal Length 2.64mm (27mm equivalent)
Front Camera: Aperture f/2.0
Rear Camera: Resolution 21.16MP
Rear Camera: Sensor Sony IMX230 Exmor RS
(1.12µm, 1/2.4")
Rear Camera: Focal Length 4.73mm (27mm equivalent)
Rear Camera: Aperture f/2.2

Positioned in front of the rear camera sensor is a 6-element LARGAN lens system that helps improve sharpness near the edges of the image, according to Meizu. The 27mm focal length (35mm equivalent) is fairly typical for smartphone cameras today. Shorter focal lengths increase field of view at the expense of magnification (objects in the image will be comparatively smaller than what is seen by the naked eye for focal lengths less than about 50mm). Because most smartphone cameras lack optical zoom lenses, there’s no way to compensate for the this effect without either compromising image quality by using digital zoom or physically getting closer to the subject. This is why I personally do not like the current trend towards shorter focal lengths.

The lens’ aperture is important, because it determines how much light reaches the sensor. The PRO 5’s f/2.2 lens gives it an aperture area 10% larger than the Huawei P9 and 30% larger than the iPhone 6s Plus; however, its aperture area is 15% smaller than the Nexus 6P and Moto X Pure Edition and 26% smaller than the Galaxy S7, which currently has the largest aperture area of any smartphone. The lack of OIS and an aperture area that’s merely average could hold back the PRO 5’s low-light performance.

The 5MP front-facing camera uses an OmniVision OV5670 sensor, which we’ve also seen in the Asus ZenFone 2. This choice is a little disappointing, because of its small format; smaller sensors capture less light. Many competing phones use 5MP cameras with a 1/4" format and larger 1.4µm pixels.

Camera UX

Meizu’s camera app has a very basic user interface in the default Auto mode. Located along one edge are controls for the flash and timer, along with a toggle to apply various image filters. The HDR control is in the settings menu, which is accessed by tapping the gear icon. With Meizu’s camera app, HDR is either on or off—there’s no automatic HDR mode—so not having an HDR toggle in the main UI is inconvenient.

Tapping the button to the left of the shutter button opens the camera mode selection menu, shown on the left in the screenshot above. Most of the modes are self explanatory. The “Gif” mode, for example, records a six-second video and turns it into a 320x320 animated gif. The “Light field” mode’s label is a bit misleading. It’s actually a selective focus mode that rapidly takes between five to ten pictures at different focal distances. This allows you to change the object in focus later in post-processing. The feature works as intended, but image size is restricted to only 5MP, which significantly degrades quality. It’s also worth noting that the Panorama, Light field, Macro, and Slow-mo modes are not available when using the front-facing camera.

The settings menu is pretty simple, providing control over a few additional features as well as photo and video resolution. There’s an optional level gauge feature that turns the shutter button into a pseudo-bubble-level; however, the level is laggy and inaccurate, making it far less useful than just lining up your shot by using the grid lines. It’s nice to see an option for manual metering, though, which allows you to set focus and exposure points independently.

Meizu’s camera app also provides a manual mode, although it’s not on par with LG’s or Samsung’s. The first issue is that the UI is fixed to portrait mode and does not rotate into landscape mode. This also affects the settings and camera modes menus, which are also portrait only. Another issue, primarily affecting the saturation, contrast, and white balance controls, is that the adjustment slider only offers a few preset values rather than a continuous range of adjustment. This oversight makes these controls next to useless. Finally, there’s no live preview of changes to shutter speed and ISO, which turns image exposure into a guessing game. Because of these flaws, it’s best to just leave the PRO 5 in auto mode and ignore Meizu’s manual mode, correcting any subsequent shortcomings in software later.

No camera app would be complete without beauty and panorama modes. The beauty mode has controls to make your eyes larger, chin slimmer, and skin smooth and pale, but stops short of making you look like a space alien.

Display Camera Still Image Performance & Video Quality
Comments Locked

80 Comments

View All Comments

  • Aaight - Friday, June 24, 2016 - link

    So...when is the second half of the s7 review coming out? This is getting ridiculous..
  • Ranger1065 - Friday, June 24, 2016 - link

    Anandtech is like a ship with a hole in the bottom, leaking water, and they only seem concerned with getting the ship pointed in the right direction.
  • adriangb - Friday, June 24, 2016 - link

    I say keep up the reviews of these Chinese phones! As has been pointed out, just because they're not brought to the US doesn't mean they're not available elsewhere.
    Also, consider that while AnandTech does put out the most thorough reviews, finding good ones one the newest Galaxy isn't hard. You can also walk into a store and test it yourself. For the rarer phones like Xiaomi, unless you can travel to China and read Chinese, you may not even know what the actual specs (including LTE bands) are before you buy it from some random seller.
  • justaway2 - Friday, June 24, 2016 - link

    http://www.gsmarena.com/xiaomi_mi_5-6948.php
  • cwolf78 - Friday, June 24, 2016 - link

    Why would you review this but not the HTC 10 considering availability? Can you at least do an audio comparison between the two for calls and music on the phone speaker and music performance on headphones? Or have you guys dismissed HTC as a "has-been" and have written them off? I know they aren't Apple or anything, but dayum...

    I used to come to AnandTech first for reviews, but those are days long gone it seems.
  • Zoomer - Friday, June 24, 2016 - link

    I would like to see a htc ten review as well. It has some interesting features as well, and feel free to skip over the cpu/gpu benches. These are easily available elsewhere. And given the limited review resources, shouldn't devices that aren't near replacement be prioritised?
  • Impulses - Saturday, June 25, 2016 - link

    An audio comparison would be very interesting IMO since a lot of other reviewers have highly toured the HTC 10's audio output.
  • kmmatney - Friday, June 24, 2016 - link

    How is OS support for these phones? Do they have frequent Android updates? I purchased a Chinese tablet in the recent past, and support was pretty bad. The only real source of support was a forum. Are you going to be stuck on whatever version of Android comes with the phone when you buy it?
  • aryonoco - Friday, June 24, 2016 - link

    OS updates are terrible.

    Security updates are worse.

    Once in a blue moon, they might get an update. Generally not an OTA, you have to flash them manually. Even then, count yourself lucky if you get them.

    Anyone who cares about security and wanting a phone that gets prompt security updates and is supported for a reasonable amount of time should only look at the iPhone or the Nexus. And buy them outright.
  • Michael Bay - Wednesday, June 29, 2016 - link

    >android anything
    >security

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now