Office Performance: Extreme Editions

The dynamics of CPU Turbo modes, both Intel and AMD, can cause concern during environments with a variable threaded workload. There is also an added issue of the motherboard remaining consistent, depending on how the motherboard manufacturer wants to add in their own boosting technologies over the ones that Intel would prefer they used. In order to remain consistent, we implement an OS-level unique high-performance mode on all the CPUs we test which should override any motherboard manufacturer performance mode.

All of our benchmark results can also be found in our benchmark engine, Bench.

Dolphin Benchmark: link

Many emulators are often bound by single thread CPU performance, and general reports tended to suggest that Haswell provided a significant boost to emulator performance. This benchmark runs a Wii program that raytraces a complex 3D scene inside the Dolphin Wii emulator. Performance on this benchmark is a good proxy of the speed of Dolphin CPU emulation, which is an intensive single core task using most aspects of a CPU. Results are given in minutes, where the Wii itself scores 17.53 minutes.

Dolphin Emulation Benchmark

WinRAR 5.0.1: link

Our WinRAR test from 2013 is updated to the latest version of WinRAR at the start of 2014. We compress a set of 2867 files across 320 folders totaling 1.52 GB in size – 95% of these files are small typical website files, and the rest (90% of the size) are small 30 second 720p videos.

WinRAR 5.01, 2867 files, 1.52 GB

3D Particle Movement

3DPM is a self-penned benchmark, taking basic 3D movement algorithms used in Brownian Motion simulations and testing them for speed. High floating point performance, MHz and IPC wins in the single thread version, whereas the multithread version has to handle the threads and loves more cores.

3D Particle Movement: Single Threaded

3D Particle Movement: MultiThreaded

Agisoft Photoscan – 2D to 3D Image Manipulation: link

Agisoft Photoscan creates 3D models from 2D images, a process which is very computationally expensive. The algorithm is split into four distinct phases, and different phases of the model reconstruction require either fast memory, fast IPC, more cores, or even OpenCL compute devices to hand. Agisoft supplied us with a special version of the software to script the process, where we take 50 images of a stately home and convert it into a medium quality model. This benchmark typically takes around 15-20 minutes on a high end PC on the CPU alone, with GPUs reducing the time.

Agisoft PhotoScan Benchmark - Total Time

HandBrake v0.9.9: link

For HandBrake, we take two videos (a 2h20 640x266 DVD rip and a 10min double UHD 3840x4320 animation short) and convert them to x264 format in an MP4 container.  Results are given in terms of the frames per second processed, and HandBrake uses as many threads as possible.

HandBrake v0.9.9 LQ Film

HandBrake v0.9.9 2x4K

The Market, X99 Refresh and our Test Setup Office and Web Performance
Comments Locked

205 Comments

View All Comments

  • ShieTar - Tuesday, May 31, 2016 - link

    You could have saved some money by not ordering a CPU on the very first day of availability. Other than that, there is no downside to having a 6800K instead of a 5820K, its just not vastly faster.
  • ezcameron76 - Tuesday, May 31, 2016 - link

    What would have been the difference in getting it say next week or at what time would you say would be better. I have to have the PC build by this Thursday so didn't have the time but I wouldn't think the price would change in a short amount of time.
  • ShieTar - Tuesday, May 31, 2016 - link

    About 50$ I assume. Don't know how to find this info for the US, but in Germany prices have dropped by 30€ from yesterday to today:
    http://geizhals.eu/?phist=1394467
  • ezcameron76 - Tuesday, May 31, 2016 - link

    I paid $450 on newegg
  • ezcameron76 - Tuesday, May 31, 2016 - link

    My question is should I return the 6800k for the 5820k as it will overclock better or no?
  • ShieTar - Wednesday, June 1, 2016 - link

    Not really, the first 10% of better OC will be wasted on compensation of the IPC improvement anyways. And with virtually no CPU-limited games out there, you don't really need to OC anyways.
  • TEAMSWITCHER - Tuesday, May 31, 2016 - link

    I'm not sure. Most of the reviews are overclocking the 10-core 6950X. I'm wondering if there will be some sweet 6-core parts (6800K and 6950K) that overclock great because the four disabled cores are used separate the six functional cores. I'm speculating that having active cores separated by inactive cores might help to impede thermal accumulation.

    It's a funny thought I had today, but I don't know of any way to find out which cores are disabled.
  • HighTech4US - Tuesday, May 31, 2016 - link

    Where the heck is the GTX 1080 review?

    It's been weeks since the NDA was lifted on it and now with the NDA lifted on the GTX 1070 nothing again.

    Since there was time to do this review excuses about not enough time to do a proper review won't hold water.
  • fanofanand - Tuesday, May 31, 2016 - link

    960 *cough*
  • JanSolo242 - Tuesday, May 31, 2016 - link

    For a mere $4,115, why not order a 22 core Xeon? :-D

    http://ark.intel.com/products/91317/Intel-Xeon-Pro...

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now