Seagate has started volume shipments of its first helium-filled hard drives. They were announced earlier this year. The new HDDs are available to all interested parties, which means that Seagate’s biggest customers have already evaluated and validated them. Volume shipments of the 8 TB and 10 TB helium-filled hard drives will help Seagate to improve its financial results and margins, since the new HDDs will be amongst the most expensive drives in the company’s lineup.

Brand New Platform

The Seagate Enterprise Capacity 3.5 helium-filled hard drive is based on the company’s brand-new hermetically-sealed platform featuring fourteen heads and seven perpendicular magnetic recording (PMR) platters with up to 1.43 TB capacity each. Seagate claims that the new HDD platform is based on a special wide-weld hermetically sealed drive enclosure with a design based on a multi-step forging process. Besides that, it uses a motor attached to both top and bottom covers, in order to better handle vibrations and maximize reliability. Sensors for humidity, temperature and helium pressure ensure that the helium-filled drive is always being monitored for reliable operation.

Seagate has incorporated PowerChoice and PowerBalance technologies in the new drives. PowerChoice helps datacenter operators to manage power consumption during idle time by either reducing spindle speed, or even stopping disks completely, after an admin-defined interval of idle time. Meanwhile, PowerBalance technology helps the administrators to balance the power consumption and IOPS (input/output operations per second) performance of hard drives prior to installation.

The Enterprise Capacity 3.5" helium hard drive sports a 256 MB multi-segmented cache. The platters rotate at 7200 revolutions per minute (RPM). The host interface is SATA 3.2 (6 Gbps), and supports hot-plugging.

Seagate claims that its multi-segmented cache helps the Enterprise Capacity 3.5 (Helium) HDD to improve performance compared to its predecessors and rivals and enables burst transfer rates at up to 600 MB/s (for small chunks of data, of course). The company does not reveal many details about its new caching algorithms, but 256 MB of memory is still a rather huge buffer.

Lineup and Performance Numbers

Seagate will offer multiple versions of its Enterprise Capacity 3.5" Helium HDDs, including models with 8 TB capacity, 4K and 512e sectors as well as self-encrypting (SED) options.

Lineup of Seagate's Enterprise Capacity 3.5" Helium HDDs with SATA Interface
  Standard 4KN Standard 512e Self-Encrypting 4KN (SED) Self-Encrypting 512e (SED)
10 TB Capacity ST10000NM0006 ST10000NM0016  ST10000NM0056 ST10000NM0046
8 TB Capacity ST8000NM0006  ST8000NM0016 ST8000NM0056 ST8000NM0046

Seagate declares fairly high performance numbers for its Enterprise Capacity 3.5" Helium HDDs: 243 or 254 MB/s maximum sustained transfer rate as well as 4.16 ms average latency, which is higher than the numbers listed by competing drives from HGST and Western Digital.

Comparison of Helium-Filled HDDs
  Seagate Enterpise Capacity
ST10000NM0006
HGST Ultrastar He10
HUH721010ALE600xxxx
WD Gold
WD8002FRYZ
Capacity 10 TB 8 TB
RPM 7200 RPM
Interface SATA 6 Gbps
DRAM Cache 256 MB 128 MB
Maximum Sustained Transfer Rate 243 MB/s
254 MB/s
225 MB/s
249 MB/s
205 MB/s
Average Latency 4.16 ms unknown
Rated Workload (Drive Writes Per Day) 0.189 unknown 0.189
Equivalent of 550 TB of Writes per Year unknown Equivalent of 550 TB of Writes per Year
Acoustics Idle 28 - 30 dBA 20 - 36 dBA 20 dBA
Seek 32 - 34 dBA unknown 36 dBA
Power Rating Idle 4.5 W 5 W 5.10 W
Random Write 6.5 W 6.8 W 7.4 W
Random Read 8.5W 6.8 W 7.4 W
MTBF 2.5 million hours
Warranty 5 Years
Price $695 at Amazon unknown $629

Usage of helium inside a hard drive helps to reduce the drag force acting on the spinning disk stack and lower the fluid flow forces affecting the disks and the heads. As a result, HDD makers can install up to seven platters into a standard drive and also use lower-power motors and mechanics. This reduces the power consumption of the HDDs. For example, power consumption of Seagate’s 10 TB hard drive is actually lower than power consumption of the company’s 8 TB drive for nearline applications (8.5 W per drive vs. 10.4 W per drive).

For cloud datacenters, power consumption of HDDs is as important as their capacity. Increasing the capacity of the top-of-the-range hard drives from 8 TB to 10 TB automatically boosts total capacity per rack by 25% (which means an increase from 1920 TB to 2400 TB per standard rack that holds 240 drives). Going helium additionally reduces the power consumption of such a rack by up to 456 W. An increase of storage capacity amid reduction of power consumption not only maximizes data storage capacities of a particular facility, but also shrinks its total cost of ownership (TCO), an important metric for companies with multiple large datacenters.

Broad Availability, But No SAS Models Yet

It should be noted that when Seagate introduced its Enterprise Capacity 3.5" 10 TB HDD in January, the company announced models with Serial ATA 6 Gb/s and SAS 12 Gb/s interfaces, which were aimed at different environments. At present, Seagate only ships models with SATA interfaces, meaning that customers, who need SAS, may still be evaluating SAS drives, which will come to market later. By contrast, HGST offers different models of its 10 TB HDDs: with SATA and SAS interfaces.

While Seagate said that its 10 TB helium-filled HDDs are available from its distributors worldwide, it did not reveal their actual prices. Amazon currently sells the Seagate Enterprise Capacity 3.5" HDD 10TB (ST10000NM0016) for $695.98 (note that this is not an MSRP), which is far from affordable. Still, keep in mind that we talking about exclusive products based on a brand-new platform. Such HDDs make a lot of sense for datacenters, but, currently, not so much for desktops or NAS units.

Source: Seagate

POST A COMMENT

65 Comments

View All Comments

  • ShieTar - Friday, April 29, 2016 - link

    "no big deal" is not entirely correct here, Helium is widely used as a measurement tool for leak rates, because it will leak faster and through smaller gaps than any other gas except for hydrogen. So to ensure a constant Helium pressure within a case (that may cycle in temperature quiet regularly) for 5 years is non-trivial.

    But yeah, still easier than vacuum. Which would lead to instant evaporation of normal lubricants as well, so you would have to replace the mechanism by something vacuum capable with a dry lubricant.
    Reply
  • jabber - Saturday, April 30, 2016 - link

    Actually maintaining a vacuum is easier than trapping helium long term. Reply
  • BurntMyBacon - Monday, May 02, 2016 - link

    @jabber: "Actually maintaining a vacuum is easier than trapping helium long term."

    True. It is easier to keep an enclosure sealed against a nitrogen and oxygen leak than a helium leak, so maintaining a vacuum is easier than trapping helium long term. However, operating mechanical parts in a vacuum is not. The two big hitters that come to mind are how vibrations affect moving parts at small distances with no air cushion (think head crash) and how you keep joints and spindles from seizing up (liquid lubricants don't hold up in vacuum). I'm not sure dry lubricants are practical at normal HDD spindles speeds either.
    Reply
  • FunBunny2 - Monday, May 02, 2016 - link

    -- True. It is easier to keep an enclosure sealed against a nitrogen and oxygen leak than a helium leak, so maintaining a vacuum is easier than trapping helium long term.

    I'd like to see the equations on that, since this amounts to the assertion that He at standard temperature and pressure (at least, that's what current reporting states) inside a vessel will more easily escape a seal out of the vessel than atmosphere will breach a seal from outside a vacuum vessel (vessels engineered to contain/block passage).
    Reply
  • ZeDestructor - Friday, June 03, 2016 - link

    The helium goes straight through the metal because of how small the singl-atom molecules are (they fit between the atoms of the metal and go straight through..). Every other element has a bigger molecule in comparison and has a much harder time going through materials. Reply
  • boeush - Thursday, April 28, 2016 - link

    I have trouble with that notion (of heads riding on a 'cushion' of air.) If anything, there are complexities of turbulence caused by friction, head movements, acoustic resonances - that would induce chaotic vibrations to begin with. And if Bernoulli physics have not yet been repealed, I'd expect the air near the platter to be moving faster (due to platter-air friction tugging it along) than air at the midpoint between platters - and faster moving air means lower pressure. Which would imply that the air dynamics would actually act to pull the heads toward the platter rather than 'floating' them - so the heads would have to incorporate some kind of an airfoil-like wing just to counter that force. Which introduced yet more friction and turbulence losses/instabilities into the system. Reply
  • Azethoth - Thursday, April 28, 2016 - link

    I have trouble with people posting giant paragraphs about how they don't understand engineering or physics and doubting the factual statements made by more knowledgeable posters.

    Try to be scientific and curious. Instead of spouting all this pseudo science (are you trying to convince us you are smart?), just go google it. You will quickly learn that drive heads ride on a cushion of air as stated. In the face of actual facts go reread your post and be humble and curious next time.

    This may sound harsh to you, but it will help you in your job and life if you have a curious "I want to learn" attitude.
    Reply
  • Anato - Friday, April 29, 2016 - link

    +1

    Hard drives are just like Boeush described they couldn't be.
    Reply
  • saratoga4 - Friday, April 29, 2016 - link

    This is a great post. Reply
  • cyberguyz - Friday, April 29, 2016 - link

    I seriously roflmao'ed at that post.

    Air cushioning of the heads have been a known fact for as long as winchester-based DASD has existed.

    What do they teach kids in school these days?
    Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now