AnandTech Storage Bench - Light

Our Light storage test has relatively more sequential accesses and lower queue depths than The Destroyer or the Heavy test, and it's by far the shortest test overall. It's based largely on applications that aren't highly dependent on storage performance, so this is a test more of application launch times and file load times. This test can be seen as the sum of all the little delays in daily usage, but with the idle times trimmed to 25ms it takes less than half an hour to run. Details of the Light test can be found here.

AnandTech Storage Bench - Light (Data Rate)

The average data rate scores of the 750 EVOs allow it to blend in to the crowd as a solid performer and the fastest planar TLC drive on the Light test.

AnandTech Storage Bench - Light (Latency)

The average service time of the 750 EVO again places it as one of the fastest planar TLC drives and a reasonable performer compared to the SATA market overall. The 120GB 750 EVO is also relatively close to the 250GB version, while other 120GB models are considerably slower than their larger counterparts.

AnandTech Storage Bench - Light (Latency)

The number of latency outliers experienced by the 750 EVO in the Light test is normal for TLC drives but considerably higher than most MLC drives.

AnandTech Storage Bench - Light (Power)

Power usage over the course of the Light test separates the drives pretty cleanly into different categories. The 750 EVO clearly requires more power than the 850 EVO, and all the other TLC drives require more power than the 750 EVO. The MLC drives all require less energy than all the TLC drives, except that the 850 Pro sacrifices efficiency to deliver its high performance.

AnandTech Storage Bench - Heavy Random Performance
Comments Locked

109 Comments

View All Comments

  • Sn3akr - Monday, April 25, 2016 - link

    8$ is just too little of a difference and will not make a difference in a build as such.. I only see this as being implemented in finished machines from manufacturers, so that they can pop another 8$ in their pocket. Aftermarket.. Doubt it will sell a lot.
    Maybe i would use it in a HTPC, since it's not something that requires a lot of R/W operations once it's booted up
  • slowdemon21 - Thursday, April 28, 2016 - link

    I noticed PNY & OCZ BENCHED IN THE MIDDLE, Sammy on the bottom [loser]
  • Ahmad kassem - Sunday, May 1, 2016 - link

    Is it ok to make more than one partition on this ssd or any other ssd?
  • wayneclaassen - Thursday, May 5, 2016 - link

    Well I needless to say I found the Samsung EVO 250GIG extremely reliable although it is a bit expensive, but for anyone that mostly run high performance graphics this price tag shouldn't be a big problem.
  • Bulat Ziganshin - Saturday, May 7, 2016 - link

    1. 750 may be a hit for developing markets. in particular i've seen 750 reviews on russian sites much earlier than here:
    fcenter/online/hardarticles/hdd/38770-Samsung_SSD_zadeshevo_obzor_Samsung_650_i_Samsung_750_EVO

    2. Can you please add to your reviews checks of gc/trim effect and slc cache size as in the section
    3dnews/931062/page-2.html#Деградация%20и%20восстановление%20производительности
  • eduard.fisic - Sunday, June 5, 2016 - link

    Billy, when you guys run the benchmarks, are the Samsung Evo drives run with RAPID Mode on or off? Just out of curiosity, as I am looking to buy the 850 Evo and I'd like to know if I can expect this sort of performance without having to turn on RAPID Mode. Thanks!
  • jason_brody - Thursday, July 7, 2016 - link

    Can anyone help if I should go with this SSD or 850 series for my Dell E6500?
  • elzafir - Tuesday, April 11, 2017 - link

    The 250GB 840 EVO is $15 cheaper where I live compared to the 750 EVO of the same size. Which one should I get?
  • Manisthisunreal - Friday, October 13, 2017 - link

    Notice because of all the fatmouths saying they'll "wait until it is cheaper" the industry has now colluded to up the prices and make up some bs excuses of "low demand" "commodity trader speculation on minerals". Yes we can blame stock traders for a lot of things like high oil prices, high wheat and other food goods prices but come on I smell something fishy. I was about to buy a 250gb Samsung SSD on black Friday for $60 almost two years ago when some idiot shopper woman decided to merge into me when I was on my way home from work leading to a 15 month nightmare. I never did make it out to get my ssd. Fast forward almost 2 years later and they've doubled in price. I really wanted that.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now