Miscellaneous Aspects and Final Words

The Voyo V3 provided us with the opportunity to evaluate the capabilities of the Intel Atom x7-Z8700 in a wall-powered device. Thanks to the presence of a SATA controller (ASM1061) and a 128GB M.2 SSD as well as 4GB of RAM, the unit is actually able to provide a better experience compared to all the passively-cooled Braswell PCs that we have evaluated before. However, before talking more about the positives, let us recount all the issues we faced with the Voyo V3.

  • The advertising of the product in online stores is very misleading - there is no 5G / dual-band Wi-Fi (only a Bluetooth 4.0 + 1x1 802.11n 2.4 GHz radio), HDMI 2.0 or USB 3.1 Type-C port. The Type-C port in the system is only for power delivery and not available for data transfer
  • Voyo doesn't seem to have much experience in tuning BIOS options for stability. DTS / thermal protection was disabled in the default configuration
  • The pre-installed WIndows 10 copy is a mess - UAC was disabled and the OS refused to activate. We will be charitable when saying that Voyo doesn't know how to ship licensed versions of Windows pre-installed on the PCs, but it is more likely that the shipped OS is bootlegged. Consumers buying this PC would do well to wipe out the SSD and re-install their own copy of Windows on the machine
  • Voyo has nil support for users treating the PC as a barebones (sans OS) unit. There are no drivers available for download on their website, and we had to download the Windows install image from a Chinese filesharing website in order to get all the necessary drivers
  • The thermal design, while being effective, is not as efficient as it could have been - the heat from the SoC is transferred to the underside of the unit (with very little clearance to the surface on which the unit is placed).

The drawbacks listed above are not showstoppers, but things that consumers need to keep in mind before purchasing the unit. Moving on to the positives:

  • The fanless Voyo V3, with its top-end Cherry Trail-T SoC, 128 GB M.2 SATA SSD and 4GB of RAM, outperforms passively cooled Braswell-based mini-PCs in almost all benchmarks
  • The M.2 SATA SSD is miles ahead of eMMC-based storage subsystems found in most other Cherry Trail PCs in this price range. The RAM capacity is also quite large for this price range.
  • The industrial design of the unit, with its curved edges, metal chassis and glass top, is quite pleasing
  • The unit is perfect for a secondary 1080p HTPC where HD audio bitstreaming is not a must - Kodi 16.0 works flawless with hardware video decoding for all major codecs

In terms of possible improvements, we would like Voyo to rethink the thermal solution in order to extract even more performance out of similar platforms. A better WLAN chipset is definitely needed, and I am sure consumers would be willing to pay even a $10 - $20 premium for the same. A LAN port would also be nice (though we understand that the issue has more to do with the absence of Ethernet on the Atom x7-Z8700 itself). The marketing department needs to advertise the unit with the correct specifications, and, obviously, the Windows OS issue needs to be resolved in a legal manner. It might even be better for Voyo to just ship the unit as a barebones system and make the drivers alone available for download on their website.

Based on our research, the pricing of the unit varies quite a lot. The supplier of our review unit, Gearbest, ships the system from China and has the product on sale between $208 and $215. If you are looking for a US-based seller, Amazon has got you covered for a hefty $360.

In summary, once we got past the initial setup issues and learned to ignore the misleading marketing points, it became difficult to not like the Voyo V3. The price of the unit, the system performance and the nature of some of the important components (such as the SSD and RAM) make it a very good value.

Power Consumption and Thermal Performance
Comments Locked

69 Comments

View All Comments

  • ragenalien - Tuesday, March 1, 2016 - link

    Is the wireless card replaceable.
  • ganeshts - Tuesday, March 1, 2016 - link

    The wireless card communicates via SDIO and is soldered to the board.
  • ganeshts - Tuesday, March 1, 2016 - link

    You can actually check out the board layout here: http://www.cnx-software.com/wp-content/uploads/201...

    The WLAN card is on the top right (where the black antenna pigtail comes out from), and you can see that it is indeed not replaceable.
  • Coelispex - Sunday, April 3, 2016 - link

    Hi Ganeshts,

    If we use a 802.11ac USB adapter, would it work for the Voyo V3?
  • Ratman6161 - Tuesday, March 1, 2016 - link

    I can't get past the Warez OS issue. If I wanted such a device with Windows on it, it better be a legally installed copy. The idea that I would need to go out and get my own copy means you have to add $100 to the price in order to get it leagal for what it was supposed to come with out of the box.
  • ganeshts - Tuesday, March 1, 2016 - link

    I don't think Microsoft allows for 'cheap' licenses if the hardware specs are as good as the Voyo V3.. particularly, I believe the cheap license is available only for the x86 version, not x64. Also, the RAM has to be 2GB or lesser (IIRC).

    Anyways, the cost for the Windows license is an issue with any PC that doesn't have neutered hardware specifications.
  • Slawek - Tuesday, March 1, 2016 - link

    What are results of Google Octane and Mozilla Kraken? If am going to use it for web browsing these are the most important benchmarks to know.
  • ganeshts - Tuesday, March 1, 2016 - link

    Web browsing is a major part of the PCMark 8 benchmarks - and those scores make it clear that this unit is better than other passively cooled Braswell PCs.

    Usually, we don't present web browser benchmarks for mini-PCs because they vary widely with the browser used and also updates to the browsers themselves - making it difficult to go back and compare against older units. It is a different case for more 'closed' systems such as tablets and smartphones. Because of this, we believe that the PCMark 8 browser tests (with their standardized browser engine) are more indicative of performance that users can get at any given point of time.
  • Slawek - Tuesday, March 1, 2016 - link

    On my laptop difference between the latest Firefox, Chrome and Safari is within 5%, this is precise enough tool that tells me about system performance. Both Octane and Kraken are easy to execute. I can walk up to Microsoft or Apple store and in less than a minute I can compare which computer is faster.
  • ganeshts - Tuesday, March 1, 2016 - link

    Can you tell me what is the difference between Firefox 30 and Firefox 44 ? I can't go back and power up every single PC reviewed before to rerun those benchmarks every time the browser version changes.

    I prefer a standardized browsing engine, and that is what PCMark 8 provides.

    It is nice to have quick scores to compare against what you already have, but it doesn't hold up under detailed scrutiny - we need repeatable and reproducible benchmarks for different use-cases.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now