Miscellaneous Aspects and Final Words

The Voyo V3 provided us with the opportunity to evaluate the capabilities of the Intel Atom x7-Z8700 in a wall-powered device. Thanks to the presence of a SATA controller (ASM1061) and a 128GB M.2 SSD as well as 4GB of RAM, the unit is actually able to provide a better experience compared to all the passively-cooled Braswell PCs that we have evaluated before. However, before talking more about the positives, let us recount all the issues we faced with the Voyo V3.

  • The advertising of the product in online stores is very misleading - there is no 5G / dual-band Wi-Fi (only a Bluetooth 4.0 + 1x1 802.11n 2.4 GHz radio), HDMI 2.0 or USB 3.1 Type-C port. The Type-C port in the system is only for power delivery and not available for data transfer
  • Voyo doesn't seem to have much experience in tuning BIOS options for stability. DTS / thermal protection was disabled in the default configuration
  • The pre-installed WIndows 10 copy is a mess - UAC was disabled and the OS refused to activate. We will be charitable when saying that Voyo doesn't know how to ship licensed versions of Windows pre-installed on the PCs, but it is more likely that the shipped OS is bootlegged. Consumers buying this PC would do well to wipe out the SSD and re-install their own copy of Windows on the machine
  • Voyo has nil support for users treating the PC as a barebones (sans OS) unit. There are no drivers available for download on their website, and we had to download the Windows install image from a Chinese filesharing website in order to get all the necessary drivers
  • The thermal design, while being effective, is not as efficient as it could have been - the heat from the SoC is transferred to the underside of the unit (with very little clearance to the surface on which the unit is placed).

The drawbacks listed above are not showstoppers, but things that consumers need to keep in mind before purchasing the unit. Moving on to the positives:

  • The fanless Voyo V3, with its top-end Cherry Trail-T SoC, 128 GB M.2 SATA SSD and 4GB of RAM, outperforms passively cooled Braswell-based mini-PCs in almost all benchmarks
  • The M.2 SATA SSD is miles ahead of eMMC-based storage subsystems found in most other Cherry Trail PCs in this price range. The RAM capacity is also quite large for this price range.
  • The industrial design of the unit, with its curved edges, metal chassis and glass top, is quite pleasing
  • The unit is perfect for a secondary 1080p HTPC where HD audio bitstreaming is not a must - Kodi 16.0 works flawless with hardware video decoding for all major codecs

In terms of possible improvements, we would like Voyo to rethink the thermal solution in order to extract even more performance out of similar platforms. A better WLAN chipset is definitely needed, and I am sure consumers would be willing to pay even a $10 - $20 premium for the same. A LAN port would also be nice (though we understand that the issue has more to do with the absence of Ethernet on the Atom x7-Z8700 itself). The marketing department needs to advertise the unit with the correct specifications, and, obviously, the Windows OS issue needs to be resolved in a legal manner. It might even be better for Voyo to just ship the unit as a barebones system and make the drivers alone available for download on their website.

Based on our research, the pricing of the unit varies quite a lot. The supplier of our review unit, Gearbest, ships the system from China and has the product on sale between $208 and $215. If you are looking for a US-based seller, Amazon has got you covered for a hefty $360.

In summary, once we got past the initial setup issues and learned to ignore the misleading marketing points, it became difficult to not like the Voyo V3. The price of the unit, the system performance and the nature of some of the important components (such as the SSD and RAM) make it a very good value.

Power Consumption and Thermal Performance
Comments Locked

69 Comments

View All Comments

  • ganeshts - Tuesday, March 1, 2016 - link

    As you can see from the thermal stress graphs, the GPU clocks in around 280 MHz for the Furmark stress test. It is always above the base clock claimed by Intel (200 MHz). In any case, the configuration is such that the total power draw by the system at the wall doesn't exceed 10W under any circumstance (obviously, power draw by any connected USB peripherals is excluded).
  • woggs - Tuesday, March 1, 2016 - link

    How do you know you didn't get viruses or other spy-ware for a Chinese file sharing site? I've seen this happen on low-end and high-end systems going direct to vendor sites for drivers in some cases, which resulted in attempts to create an encrypted link back to Chinese IP addresses. The description of issues raise lots of red flags.
  • ganeshts - Tuesday, March 1, 2016 - link

    I downloaded on to a VM first. Mounted with 'Dism' on the VM and scanned with Windows Defender before moving it to the Voyo V3 / main network.

    But, yes, Voyo needs to make the drivers available separately.
  • user_5447 - Tuesday, March 1, 2016 - link

    Why iperf (ip perf) is confusingly written as iPerf in Wi-Fi graphs?
  • Shadowmaster625 - Tuesday, March 1, 2016 - link

    This bifurcated market remains an insulting joke. You can buy these types of systems for $150 all day long. But simply upgrade the atom into a Core m and all the sudden the price is jacked up by $300? That is so insulting that I wouldnt even contemplate buying either.
  • DanNeely - Tuesday, March 1, 2016 - link

    Most of that's down to Intel's pricing. $40 for atom, vs $280 for core M. Implementing a Core M system is more expensive as well, the SoC has 30% more contacts (FCBGA 1515 vs 1170), some of which correspond to extra mobo traces (more expensive PCB). Component wise, you're also looking at 2 channels of ram not 1 for at few more dollars of parts.

    The OEMs are probably charging slightly higher margins since Core M is branded as a premium product not race to the bottom, and retail margins are generally a percentage of the price not a flat dollar amount; but most of the price difference is down to Intel's pricing. Their holding good mobile CPU prices (ie not their cheap lines: Atom, Pentium, Celeron) at floor of nearly $200 is all about maximizing returns in a portion of the market that they have nearly no effective competition at present. (Hopefully Zen will let AMD compete in CPU performance/watt in the ultrabook processor category soon.)
  • DanNeely - Tuesday, March 1, 2016 - link

    Lastly, Core M is priced at a premium to core i3/5/7 because they're dies that're binned for working decently at extra low power levels, the intermediate level Celeron/Pentium lines are much cheaper because they're a dumping ground for duds.
  • dsraa - Tuesday, March 1, 2016 - link

    $359 on the 'advertised' amazon link.....pffft. Ain't buying it from there almost 2x as much.....yuck.
  • ganeshts - Tuesday, March 1, 2016 - link

    You can always use the Gearbest link that is in the final page (just prior to the Amazon link) which reflects the true value / non-inflated cost of the system - around $200.
  • jimbo2779 - Thursday, March 3, 2016 - link

    I would never deal with gearbest. Do your research on them, they are terrible, absolutely awful.

    Their trustpilot reviews are faked so look elsewhere and you get an idea of the type of company they are.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now