Conclusion: EVGA Z77 FTW

EVGA is a brand that is often synonymous with high end products and a loyal fan base.  With respect to motherboards, EVGA have produced some of the most creative and popular designs, especially in the X58 era with the EVGA SR-2, a dual socket motherboard for Xeon processors, and the X58 Classified.  With a wealth of overclocking knowledge, the EVGA brand has also produced world records in overclocking.

When it comes to the Z77 platform, despite overclocking on Ivy Bridge being not as cut and thrust as some older platforms, EVGA still use that knowledge to produce a board that users can overclock on.  As a result, we get some great overclocking options and a board that happily hits 4.7 GHz on our i7-3770K during testing in the Z77 FTW.

The main reason the EVGA Z77 FTW was included in this review is due to two factors – it comes in between the $280-$350 mark at $310, and also contains a vital PLX PEX 8747 chip, used for creating a wider range of PCIe lane opportunities than the standard Z77 chipset.  EVGA take a different approach than the other manufacturers in our review, by only sending eight of the sixteen PCIe 3.0 lanes from the CPU to the PLX chip.  This leaves the other eight to concentrate on the first PCIe slot, and should help single and dual GPU overclocking which can take a hit due to the PLX chip.

Users of multiple PCIe devices are advised to always keep the GPU in the first slot to maximize throughput, even if the system recognizes the electrically connected lane counts.  While it sounds better to have x16/x16 from placing GPUs in slots two and four, keeping them in slots one and four (x8/x16) is actually preferential due to the eight lanes direct to the CPU that the first GPU has.

If that was not complex enough, we should also point out that the EVGA Z77 FTW does not include a form of MultiCore Enhancement using BIOS 1.07 or below.  This feature on some other motherboards increases the CPU speed at heavier loading at the expense of power and temperature, but also increases their benchmarking scores a little.  EVGA say that they will have this ‘feature’ in a later BIOS.

Our testing also took another hit, with the EVGA Z77 FTW taking the same policy as Biostar and ECS on their Z77 motherboards, by not liking our test memory kit at XMP.  As a result, we had to run the system at DDR3-2000 9-11-11.  The memory speed of a board does not affect the test bed to any significant degree, but coupled with the lack of MultiCore Enhancement means that out of the box, given the testing results, the EVGA does not keep pace with ASUS and EVGA even at stock speeds.  This is shown quite dramatically during our 3DPM Multithreaded test, where the EVGA has a less than optimal multithreading turbo adjustment algorithm at play.

Feature wise, the Z77 FTW comes without the main video outputs, plunging for DisplayPort only, and in terms of extra features these are limited to a 24-pin ATX connector at right angles to normal, dual NIC, an extra SATA controller, access to three BIOS profiles, and a differently wired PLX chip.  There is a lot in the box as well, especially if you like back panel connectors.  Compared to the other motherboards in the review, some of which feature included WiFi, Bluetooth, Intel NIC, other video outputs, more USB 3.0 ports, better audio (EVGA Z77 FTW has only the ALC889), an easy installer package, graphical BIOS settings, and other extras like an mSATA port, the EVGA board is hit hard by the competition.

The EVGA Z77 FTW is beaten down heavily by the performance of the Gigabyte G1.Sniper 3, which also offers a lot more in the way of features while still having a PLX chip.  Even compared to the Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H, which is just over half the price, the Gigabyte has a lot more functionality if you do not need 4 x16 PCIe devices.  There are better deals to be had than the EVGA Z77 FTW in the market, which is of little comfort to a company that has obviously spent time over its product.

Conclusion: ECS Z77H2-AX Conclusion: PLX 8747 and Multi-GPU Setups


View All Comments

  • ultimatex - Wednesday, August 22, 2012 - link

    I got this MOBO from Newegg the first day they had it available , I couldn't believe the price since it offered 8x8x8x8x , Picked it up the first day and havent looked back. Doesnt look as cool as the Asrock extreme9 but it still looks good. Awesome Job Gygabyte , Anandtech should have given them a Gold not bronze though since the fan issue is a minor issue. Reply
  • Arbie - Wednesday, August 22, 2012 - link

    For gaming, at least, how many people are really going to build a 2xGPU system? Let alone 3x or 4x. The are so few PC games that can use anything more than one strong card AND are worth playing for more than 10 minutes. I actually don't know of any such games, but tastes differ. And some folks will have multi-monitor setups, and possibly need two cards. But overall I'd think the target audience for these mobos is extremely small.

    Maybe for scientific computing?
  • Belard - Wednesday, August 22, 2012 - link

    Yep.... considering that most AAA PC games are just ports from consoles... having 3-4 GPUs is pointless. The returns get worse after the first 2 cards.

    Only those with 2~6 monitors can benefit with 2-3 cards.

    Also, even $80 Gigabyte boards will do 8x x 8x SLI/CF just fine.

    But hey, someone wants to spend $300 on a board... more power to them.
  • cmdrdredd - Wednesday, August 22, 2012 - link

    "Only those with 2~6 monitors can benefit with 2-3 cards."

    Oh really? 2560x1440 on a single card is garbage in my view. I am not happy with 50fps average.
  • rarson - Wednesday, August 22, 2012 - link

    If you're going multi-GPU on a single monitor, you're wasting money. Reply
  • Sabresiberian - Wednesday, August 22, 2012 - link

    Because everyone should build to your standards, O god of all things computer.

    Do some reading; get a clue.
  • Steveymoo - Thursday, August 23, 2012 - link


    If you have a 120hz monitor, 2 GPUs make a tonne of difference. Before you come back with a "no one can see 120hz" jibe. That is also incorrect.... My eyes have orgasms every once in a while when you get those ultra detail 100+ fps moments in battlefield, that look great!
  • von Krupp - Friday, August 24, 2012 - link

    No. Metro 2033 is not happy at 2560x1440 with just a single HD 7970, and neither are Battlefield 3 or Crysis. The Total War series also crawls at maximum settings.

    I bought the U2711 specifically to take advantage of two cards (and for accurate colours, mind you). I have a distaste for multi-monitor gaming and will continue to have such as long as they keep making bezels on monitors.

    So please, don't go claiming that multi-card is useless on a single monitor because that just isn't true.
  • swing848 - Monday, December 8, 2014 - link

    At this date, December 2014, with maximum eye candy turned on, there are games that drop a refrence AMD R9 290 below 60 fps on a single monitor at 1920x1080 [using an Intel i5-3570K at 4GHz to 4.2GHz] Reply
  • Sabresiberian - Wednesday, August 22, 2012 - link

    This is not 1998, there are many games built for the PC only, and even previously console-oriented publishers aren't just making ports for the PC, they are developing their games to take advantage of the goodness only PCs can bring to the table. Despite what console fanboys continue to spew, PC gaming is on the rise, and console gaming is on the relative decline. Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now