ASRock Z77 Extreme6 Review: Legacy Bites Backby Ian Cutress on July 13, 2012 2:00 PM EST
- Posted in
ASRock Z77 Extreme6 In The Box
ASRock boxes seem to flip-flop between being very good and not that good. The appeal inside the box should outweigh the assumed contents given the price - if you can tool up a $100 motherboard package with what we would assume a $200 package would contain then you are in the clear.
Rear IO Panel
Quick Installation Guide
Software Setup Guide
Four SATA Cables
3-slot fixed SLI Bridge
Front USB 3.0 Panel + SSD Holder
One jewel in ASRock's crown is the smart USB front panels they stick in their box. The first board I ever reviewed for P67, the ASRock P67 Extreme4, came with it in a very well priced package. The Z77 Extreme6 comes in more expensive than that board, so by default we should expect it here, and we do (which is a good thing). Even though very few other manufacturers have it, what other manufacturers do have often is a full complement of SATA cables - despite having 8 SATA ports on board ASRock choose only to put four cables in the box.
After my first publication of OCCT voltage readings, a few readers responded with a more in-depth reasoning behind some of the results we were seeing. With this in mind, I would like to re-describe what we are doing with this test, and how it comes about.
Much of what an enthusiast overclocker does is monitor CPU temperature and voltage. Whatever settings a user places in the BIOS or OS is at the mercy of the motherboard - in terms of actually setting the values and reporting the values back. As an enthusiast, we have to rely on what readings we get back, and hope that motherboard manufacturers are being honest with their readings.
Take CPU voltage. What we as a user see in CPU-Z or OCCT is a time-averaged value that hides voltage ripple (if any) for power delivery. It is very easy for a motherboard manufacturer to hide this value, or to disregard slight deviations and report a constant value to the user. The CPU voltage reading can be taken at a variety of places on the power plane, which can vary between motherboards and manufacturers, meaning that each reading is essentially not comparable with the other. Nevertheless, as an enthusiast, we will constantly compare value A with value B.
Whether or not I can achieve 4.7 GHz with 1.175 volts on a particular board is inconsequential - your motherboard may perhaps produce the same result with a reading at 1.200 volts. The only way to test the actual value is with consistent methodology is via an oscilloscope connected to similar points on each board. This may sound like taking an OCCT reading is therefore redundant.
However, motherboards have settings relating to load line calibration. As load is applied to the CPU, the voltage across the processor decreases (VDroop). Load Line calibration essentially attempts to control this level of droop, by increasing voltage when voltage drops are detected away from a fixed value. Manufacturers have different ideas on how to modify LLC with respect to load, or whether the level of modification should be controlled by the user. Some manufacturers offer the option at a variety of levels, such that overclockers can be sure of the applied setting (even if it increases peak voltage, as explained by AnandTech in 2007).
By doing a full load OCCT test, we are essentially determining both how aggressive the motherboard is reporting the CPU voltage under load and how aggressive load line calibration is performing (from the point of view of the user without an oscilloscope or DVM). If someone has one of the motherboards we have tested and you have a different one, variations in load voltage should describe the offset you may require for overclock comparisons.
|Reported Load Voltage / V|
|ASRock Fatal1ty Z77 Professional||0.956|
|ASRock Z77 Extreme4||1.050-1.058|
|ASRock Z77 Extreme6||1.040-1.048|
|ASUS P8Z77-V Deluxe||1.085|
|ASUS P8Z77-V Pro||1.090|
Note: Ivy Bridge does not overclock like Sandy Bridge. For a detailed report on the effect of voltage on Ivy Bridge (and thus temperatures and power draw), please read Undervolting and Overclocking on Ivy Bridge.
Our standard overclocking methodology is as follows. For automatic overclocks options, they are selected and tested for stability with PovRay and OCCT to simulate high-end workloads and catch any immediate causes for memory or CPU errors.
For manual overclocks, based on the information gathered from previous testing, starts off at a nominal voltage and CPU multiplier, and the multiplier is increased until the stability tests are failed. The CPU voltage is increased gradually until the stability tests are passed, and the process repeated until the motherboard reduces the multiplier automatically (due to safety protocol) or the CPU temperature reaches a stupidly high level (100ºC+).
Our test bed is not in a case, which should push overclocks higher with fresher (cooler) air. We also are using Intel's All-in-one Liquid Cooler with its stock fan. This is a 120mm radiator liquid cooler, designed to mimic a medium-to-high end air cooler.
Options for automatic overclocking are found in the BIOS. We have the main option, 'Advanced Turbo 30' which implements a 4.7 GHz overclock, and a second option 'Optimized CPU OC' that gives a series of options from 4.0 GHz to 4.8 GHz in 200 MHz increments.
Advanced Turbo 30 sets the BIOS to give 4.7 GHz to all cores at load. The setting enables PLL Overvoltage, and applies the following settings:
CPU Voltage: +0.085 volts
CPU Load Line Calibration: Level 1
iGPU Voltage: +0.120 volts
iGPU Load Line Calibration: Level 2
With these settings, the OS reported a voltage at load of 1.280 volts. Temperatures were very high, showing a peak temperature of 97ºC during PovRay and 98ºC during OCCT. It should be noted that the VRM heatsinks were barely warm to the touch.
For the Optimized CPU OC, the following results were obtained:
At the 4.0 GHz setting, the BIOS was set to 40x multiplier on all cores, CPU voltage set to Auto and LLC was set to Auto. In the OS, it showed 1.096 volts at full CPU load, giving maximum temperatures of 65ºC during PovRay and 66ºC during OCCT.
At the 4.2 GHz setting, the BIOS was set to 42x multiplier on all cores, CPU voltage set to Auto and LLC was set to Auto. In the OS, it showed 1.096 volts at full CPU load, giving maximum temperatures of 67ºC during PovRay and 68ºC during OCCT.
At the 4.4 GHz setting, the BIOS was set to 44x multiplier on all cores, CPU voltage set to Auto and LLC was set to Auto. In the OS, it showed 1.096 volts at full CPU load, giving maximum temperatures of 68ºC during PovRay and 70ºC during OCCT.
At the 4.6 GHz setting, the BIOS was set to 46x multiplier on all cores, CPU voltage set to Auto and LLC was set to Level 1. In the OS, it showed 1.192 volts at full CPU load, giving maximum temperatures of 80ºC during PovRay and 82ºC during OCCT.
At the 4.8 GHz setting, the BIOS was set to 48x multiplier on all cores, CPU voltage set to 1.240 volts fixed and LLC was set to Level 1. In the OS, it showed 1.248 volts at full CPU load, giving maximum temperatures of 93ºC during PovRay and 96ºC during OCCT.
For the manual overclock, given the results seen in the automatic overclocking, we started at 1.100 volts on the CPU and a 45x multiplier.
At the 45x multiplier and 1.100 volts, the computer failed to load Windows correctly. We subsequently adjusted the LLC from Auto to Level 1, which caused a successful boot and was stable during testing. The following results were achieved.
For 4.5 GHz, the minimum CPU voltage stable set in the BIOS was at 1.100 volts, and the CPU multiplier to 45x. This was stable in the OS, showing 1.096 volts at load and giving peak temperatures of 69ºC during PovRay and 70ºC during OCCT.
For 4.6 GHz, the minimum CPU voltage stable set in the BIOS was at 1.125 volts, and the CPU multiplier to 46x. This was stable in the OS, showing 1.128 volts at load and giving peak temperatures of 73ºC during PovRay and 75ºC during OCCT.
For 4.7 GHz, the minimum CPU voltage stable set in the BIOS was at 1.175 volts, and the CPU multiplier to 47x. This was stable in the OS, showing 1.160 volts at load and giving peak temperatures of 81ºC during PovRay and 82ºC during OCCT.
For 4.8 GHz, the minimum CPU voltage stable set in the BIOS was at 1.250 volts, and the CPU multiplier to 48x. This was stable in the OS, showing 1.254 volts at load and giving peak temperatures of 94ºC during PovRay and 95ºC during OCCT.
For 4.9 GHz, we were unable to find a minimum stable voltage before hitting 100ºC during testing. At 1.300 volts, the system reached 100ºC during PovRay and still crashed the system.
Post Your CommentPlease log in or sign up to comment.
View All Comments
Assimilator87 - Friday, July 13, 2012 - linkI feel like for the majority of people IDE is way more useful than floppy. If ASRock is gonna put one on the board, they may as well include both. I still have a handful of IDE drives laying around, which is useful for troubleshooting, or for use in a secondary rig.
hsew - Friday, July 13, 2012 - linkIf I really wanted a floppy drive I would buy an external USB one for 20 USD. Seems pointless to put it on a motherboard.
Johnmcl7 - Friday, July 13, 2012 - linkAgreed, I still need to use floppy disks at work and it's no problem with new machines as a USB floppy disk drive appears to work as well as an internal drive as I've had no issues with it. Even then I don't really get this board, I could certainly see making a legacy Z77 board with a couple of serial ports, PS/2 ports, PCI and IDE ports with the rest of the board very basic would be handy for legacy enterprise use but this board is nothing like that, it seems a fairly fancy motherboard with a floppy connector strangely added.
An IDE port which be handy as there are times I'm still working with IDE drives and keep some of the older P4 machines which had both sata and ide connectors for that use.
Havor - Monday, July 16, 2012 - linkAgree have not used a floppy for at least 5 years, and have not build one in my PCs for even longer, still have a USB floppy, that i used literly just once, and properly never again.
Just keeping it to show the grand kids in +20y or so, "look that's what gramps use to use to install DOS and Win 3.1!"
taltamir - Saturday, July 14, 2012 - linkIt is an issue of compatibility. Floppies are needed for ancient software you cannot replace for some reason, and such software typically does not play well with USB floppy drives.
Notmyusualid - Saturday, July 14, 2012 - linkAbsolutely agree.
cknobman - Friday, July 13, 2012 - linkJust built my new gaming rig using this board which I picked up from the Egg for less than $160.
I am happy with the board layout as it was easy to connect all my devices.
The BIOS was super easy to navigate and understand and my internet BIOS update worked which was pretty cool being able to update BIOS like that.
The build has only been running about 2 weeks and I am just running everything stock now making sure all components are stable. In another week or two I will try out overclocking.
I did have problems with the board recognizing my RAM. I put 16GB of cheap Team Xtreem Dark Series 8GB (2 x 4GB) 240-Pin DDR3 SDRAM DDR3 1600 in the board and it kept thinking it was 1333. I had to go in and force the board to think the RAM was 1600.
So far I get an occasional BSOD and it is either related to my RAM or my SSD (OCZ, I should have known better).
C'DaleRider - Friday, July 13, 2012 - link"I did have problems with the board recognizing my RAM. I put 16GB of cheap Team Xtreem Dark Series 8GB (2 x 4GB) 240-Pin DDR3 SDRAM DDR3 1600 in the board and it kept thinking it was 1333. I had to go in and force the board to think the RAM was 1600."
Dude, that's not a problem, that's exactly the way memory is supposed to work. The JEDEC standards call for 1333 as a/the default setting when first installing memory so it'll work in any motherboard, regardless of rated speed.
Then, to achieve the rated speed spec of the memory, one HAS to enter the BIOS and set it. The motherboard won't do that natively.
cknobman - Friday, July 13, 2012 - linkOk thanks for the clarification!
After reading this review I am now a little bummed about the middle/lower performance of this board compared to its competitors.
In all reality such a small difference in performance though is not my primary concern.
I think I will see much more real world benefit from the XFast USB included with this board as it seems to make a substantial impact and I do quite a lot of USB transfers (pictures, video, files).
Also nice to see this board is a good overclocker.
Samus - Friday, July 13, 2012 - linkI still wouldn't pass over the OCZ SSD as a problem. Both of mine eventually failed causing BSOD's. My Agility II didn't even last two weeks before disappearing into never-ever-land, never detected again, that is.
Stick with Intel, Crucial or some other well known memory manufacture. Plextor is up and coming, too, but I still think if one is to go Sandforce, Intel 330 or 520 is your best bet.