Comparison

With everything installed, let's take a look at one of the more important aspects of any case: cooling performance and acoustic noise.


Noise levels are good but not spectacular. We have definitely seen better cases when it comes to keeping things quiet, but we have also seen worse designs. As expected, high fan speeds increase noise levels quite a bit. It's also worth mentioning that the fans that Antec includes are not particularly quiet; purchasing fans from a different vendor noticeably reduced noise levels.



Temperatures are quite good overall, particularly the hard drive and ambient temperatures. We tested with the fans set to both low and high speed, and as expected the temperatures are generally lower at high fan speeds. However, it's interesting to note that CPU temperatures actually increased at the higher fan speed, potentially indicating a problem with airflow at that setting. Now let's see how this case compares to other cases when it comes to proper cooling.

Note: The first column is the CPU temperature, the second represents the graphics cards, the third is for the hard drives, and the last one is the ambient temperature.


Note: The first column is the CPU temperature, the second represents the graphics cards, the third is for the hard drives, and the last one is the ambient temperature.


Temperatures are very important when comparing different cases. Naturally, some cases are larger or smaller, but in terms of raw cooling performance the Nine Hundred Two is near the top of the charts. Again, keep in mind that we are using a high-end build with a quad-core CPU and three of the hottest graphics cards around -- not your typical setup. We will add a midrange system in the near future in order to provide additional performance insight.

The idle temperatures are the lowest of any of the tested cases; only Antec Skeleton offers a lower ambient system temperature, but you would expect that from the "open" design. The Silverstone FT01 and Raven along with the Antec Skeleton also offer better CPU temperatures. Moving to the load tests, overall performance drops somewhat, with a CPU temperature that is higher than everything but the rather old Silverstone TJ10. GPU temperatures are near the top, with hard drive and ambient temperatures clearly benefiting the most from the cooling design.

Test Setup Conclusion
Comments Locked

56 Comments

View All Comments

  • poee - Saturday, April 4, 2009 - link

    It baffles me why anyone would think it acceptable to market a PC case as a "gaming case" in 2009 and STILL not make allowances for 10.5" graphics cards!

    How long has it been since the release of the GeForce 8800 GTX? Nearly 2 1/2 years? How in the world can a company think that a "gaming case" doesn't need to comfortably fit a 10.5" card??? And, you know, there are already some 11" cards out now. It doesn't take a crystal ball to see that high-end graphics cards will likely only get longer, not shorter, as time goes on. As it is, ATI and NVIDIA could use even more space for their cards for better cooling, power management, etc., but they must keep the length down as much as possible because most of the cases out there cannot handle longer cards. So why are NEW gaming cases being manufactured that are still not made for these longer cards?

    Everyone who wants a high-end GPU doesn't necessarily want or need a full tower case. It's silly to have to get a case that has massive unused vertical space just so you can make use of its horizontal space. How difficult could it be to design a mid-tower case that adds an additional 3" or so front-to-back over the standard (obsolete) dimensions? Or does everyone really believe that the days of long graphics cards are a passing fad?
  • gnesterenko - Saturday, March 28, 2009 - link

    Repeatedly I see these case reviews that continue to ignore the NZXT Tempest. 3x120mm in, 1x120mm out back, 2x140mm up top. This thing moves a LOT of air and is very quiet. I'd like to see it comapred against some other cases for a change...
  • Kenjis - Sunday, March 8, 2009 - link

    I use an Antec 900 original, the Mk2 looks great, maybe not worth the hassle of undoing all my cable management and everything to swap to a new case but I do have some complaints about the testing

    I think your average person who will be building a Tri-SLI rig with 9 hard drives is going to be looking for a much larger case than this personally, I just dont see them picking this one

    Now then, I have 4 HDDs and a 8800GTS 512 in there, Yes, its a bit tight, but I've found a lot of cases to be just as bad that are going to fit where I want my case to be

    Air filters? My case stays pretty damn clean because its up off the floor....

    The Stacker was too tall for my desk, i couldnt reach the power button or anything else, and i hate having my case on the floor for dust reasons, I chose the 900 and loved it so much i bought 2 :)

    I'm happy with it, and its quiet as well
  • Grimm920 - Saturday, February 21, 2009 - link

    You tested the 900 2 and you didn't even bother to cable manage the case!!

    What a rookie mistake... come on Anandtech, you can do better then that.

    I've built a couple of computer already with this case and it has great cable management capabilities... I'm so disappointed in this review
  • thebeastie - Saturday, March 7, 2009 - link

    I think case reviews on a lot of review web sites in general need better lab conditions.
    They have the nerve to often start reviews talking about how cases and PSU choice is often over looked by consumers but when you try to look at the reviews they don't put much effort in them selves!

    I would like to see *all* case reviews performed in a professional hosting state of the art environment, I have been to a lot of data centers and gone through their tours, they always talk about how the temperature is always with in 1 degree and the humidity is at a exact percent.

    If the humidity is changing for every case review even if the room temperature is the same it is still going to make a huge difference in the thermal performance tests.

  • Googer - Tuesday, February 17, 2009 - link

    No case revuiew should ever be considered complete without having installed and photographed oversized PSU like PC Power and Coolings 1KW-SR or similar. How well would one fit in this chasis?
  • Googer - Tuesday, February 17, 2009 - link

    No case revuiew should ever be considered complete without having installed and photographed oversized PSU like PC Power and Coolings 1KW-SR or similar. How well would one fit in this chasis?
  • mazzmond - Monday, February 16, 2009 - link

    I just put together an i7 build using this case and I'd rate it as about average to good for price paid. If it comes down to $100 then it would be a good case for money assuming you like how it looks.

    Pros include excellent cooling, fairly quiet for amount of fans, excellent airflow, ease of putting the system together and at least the case I got didn't have any build quality issues or cosmetic problems. Everything works. The review didn't mention it but it does have a cable management system with several holes cut out and plenty of room for a lot of cables on the side (had no problems putting the side panel down) and they do include some cable ties on the other side of the case for this as well. Dust filters are now included which is nice and I think it looks fine.

    Cons include no hole for the CPU 12V ATX power cable. Right now I have it going over graphic cards and in order for me to make it look "neater" would need to buy a cable extension. Also, front headphone jack is not shielded properly. Trying to listen to music through it, you get constant background noise, pops. This wasn't fixed from prior 900 and should have been! So front jacks are useless for headphones. I have my hard drives in lower bay and not running raid so my middle bays are clean so for me not a problem with oversized graphic cards but could be if you need to mount a bunch of hard drives and are using some large cards.

    Overall average case with good cooling. If price drops to $100 then I'd say it would be a good buy.
  • v12v12 - Monday, February 16, 2009 - link

    Gawd what is it with these bottom mount PSU cases! It's such a flawed design!!!! Cable management is trash (or use ugly extenders), it's a fact that bottom mount PSU cases are less efficient. Geesh wtf will these manufacturers GET IT?! People want CLEAN interiors, not a rats nest of wires and stupid cable sleeves. That and look at the price of this recycled, cheap aluminum box?! People stop paying so much for this junk... Geesh.

    Another over-hyped box of boring...
  • Itguy32 - Sunday, February 15, 2009 - link

    This review is a bit limited. There are too few comparisions. Sure, in a few months there will be. I would like to see how rackmount and compartmentalized cases compete against these.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now