Test Setup<

The NVIDIA nForce4 Ultra chipset fully supports all dual core Pentium D processors in both stock and overclocked conditions. This chipset also supports the upcoming Cedar Mill processor range. Dual core really makes a difference in certain multi-tasking scenarios, as was demonstrated in the dual core performance preview. If you are interested in how the various chipsets perform in a real world multitasking setup, please take another look at that review.

Performance Test Configuration
Processor(s): Intel Pentium 840EE (3.2GHz, 800FSB, Dual-Core, 2x1MB L2, HT) utilized for all tests
RAM: 2 x 512MB Corsair CM2X512A-5400UL revision 1.3 Settings- DDR2-667 as noted at (CL3-2-2-8)
Hard Drive(s): 2 x Maxtor MaXLine III 7L300S0 300GB 7200 RPM SATA (16MB Buffer), 1 x Maxtor MaXLine III 7L300R0 300GB 7200 RPM IDE (16MB Buffer)
System Platform Drivers: Intel Chipset Software - 7.2.2.1006
NVIDIA Platform Driver - 8.22
Video Cards: 1 x XFX 7800GTX OC (PCI Express) for all tests
Video Drivers: NVIDIA nForce 81.98 WHQL
Cooling: Thermaltake Big Typhoon
Power Supply: OCZ Power Stream 520
Operating System(s): Windows XP Professional SP2
Motherboards: Biostar TForce4 U 775
Intel D975XBX
Asus P5WD2-E
Asus P5N32-SLI Deluxe
Gigabyte GA-G1 975X
Asus P5LD2 Deluxe
Asus P5WDG2-WS


Biostar Tforce4 U 775: Overclocking General Performance & Encoding
Comments Locked

31 Comments

View All Comments

  • Zoomer - Monday, September 18, 2006 - link

    I was really interested in buying this board to replace a dead board until I read the part about ALC 850. Urgh.

    The 10/100 ethernet was also an issue, but I could have lived with that. But no HD Audio? This is 2006, not 1996.
  • neweggster - Wednesday, February 22, 2006 - link

    I would like to see more articles from Biostar. They seem to have a good idea on what performance is. Any idea if you guys could get a article on the Biostar TForce4U Socket 939 NVIDIA nForce4 Ultra AMD mobo?

  • Gary Key - Wednesday, February 22, 2006 - link

    We are working on it. :)
  • cpeter38 - Tuesday, February 21, 2006 - link

    How come AT has taken down the RS580 article (at least) twice now??
  • Gary Key - Tuesday, February 21, 2006 - link

    quote:

    How come AT has taken down the RS580 article (at least) twice now??


    The NDA for the RD580 is on 3/2/06. ATI has requested the review sites adhere to this date. However, if you look around the net the article has been saved in a zip file and is available for viewing. ;-)
  • cpeter38 - Tuesday, February 21, 2006 - link

    THANK YOU!!!!

    (for the explanation)
  • cpeter38 - Tuesday, February 21, 2006 - link

    ACCCHHH!!

    ********** EDIT *************** EDIT ************

    RD580!!!
  • ronein - Sunday, February 19, 2006 - link

    quote:

    Very detailed and coherent article! I am in no way in the market for an intel/biostar board (how many are? ;), but the review was a pleasure to read. I found the author's writing style to be very unique and the article overall was outstanding. Keep up the good work AT!


    I second that!
  • lexmark - Friday, February 17, 2006 - link

    Very detailed and coherent article! I am in no way in the market for an intel/biostar board (how many are? ;), but the review was a pleasure to read. I found the author's writing style to be very unique and the article overall was outstanding. Keep up the good work AT!
  • bldckstark - Thursday, February 16, 2006 - link

    Good job on including the min and max frame rates on the graphs. That is an excellent addition. Now if we can just get the median and mode......... *>}

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now