Low-End Graphics

Since our last price guide, we currently have three AIB manufacturer's producing the newly released X1300 graphics cards. Both the MSI Radeon X1300 Pro 256MB [RTPE: RX1300PRO-TD256E] on sale for about $110 and the Sapphire Radeon X1300 256MB [RTPE: 100141] going for $100, seem like respectable deals. Too bad they don't cost much less than the 6600 GT, which ends of being a faster card.

For those who have no real need for great graphics, these low-end cards should be suitable. They're better than onboard graphics and also have the TV-Out option which many people like to use to watch movies on their televisions.

And that wraps up another video card price guide. Stay tuned next week for our recommendations and pricing!

Mid Range Graphics
Comments Locked

24 Comments

View All Comments

  • unclebud - Thursday, December 15, 2005 - link

    @ best buy this week
    because there may be people (like me) who only have pci slots and not any pci-e slots whatsoever on ANY of their machines
    hth somebody. it did me
  • h7o - Saturday, December 10, 2005 - link

    "...and less you're a diehard ATI fan" on the first page.
  • semo - Saturday, December 10, 2005 - link

    what the hell is happening with the low end cards. they're approaching the cost of mid-range and mid-range keeps getting higher and higher.

    this situation is not helped a lot by cards from the last century still being in the market me thinks.
  • GhostlyGhost2 - Friday, December 9, 2005 - link

    quote:

    but the remainder of the 6800 Ultra cards are basically high-performance cards at an ultra high cost. Quite a few of them cost as much or more than a 7800 GTX!


    Wow... And to think I was contemplatin buying a first 6800U and go SLI some time later as AnandTech always pushed as a wonderful idea. I'm sure glad I didn't make that ***COSTLY MISTAKE***.

    I sure feel for those who did, though.
  • rrcn - Friday, December 9, 2005 - link

    For the past few price guides, we've been restating that it's definitely better, performance and price-wise, to go with a single 7800GTX rather than two 6800U/GT's in SLi. ;)
  • GhostlyGhost - Friday, December 9, 2005 - link

    Yeah,. Ok. Great.

    But what will you say when the next iteration comes around? In the end, isn't SLI a pointless feature since (it appears) Nvidia can outdo itself in just one card generation?
  • JarredWalton - Saturday, December 10, 2005 - link

    I put this in the article, as I never have been a strong proponent of SLI "upgrades":


    By the way, have we mentioned that purchasing a single high-end card now and planning on upgrading with the second high-end card in the future might be a bad idea? There's probably a decent number of people out there that by the 6800 Ultra for a lot of money, with the intent of purchasing a second one when the price dropped below $300. Now they're stuck with a single card and the option to upgrade to SLI at a premium that just isn't worth it. Until ATI and NVIDIA get their multi-card solutions to work across generations, we would suggest you either go the whole hog and buy two cards initially, or just buy a single card and stick with it. There will be occasions -- like the 6800 GT -- where the prices do drop to reasonable levels, but we certainly wouldn't plan on that.


    Obviously, AnandTech has many writers, and we don't all agree on every point.
  • VooDooAddict - Tuesday, December 13, 2005 - link

    The best use for SLI that I have found is this:

    Two brothers are building new systems around the 7800GT.

    Both get inexpensive SLI boards (Biostar or Abit KN8 SLI come to mind).

    When one of the brothers upgrades to the next generation. The other can buy the replaced 7800GT and get a nice boost.

    Sure, they have to get slightly beefier powersupplies. Is that really such a bad thing?
  • rgreen83 - Friday, December 9, 2005 - link

    Where the heck are the 6600 non gt's? thats probably the most compelling card around the low-mid to low range right now which i am looking into for my little bro's pc.
  • Cygni - Saturday, December 10, 2005 - link

    Ya, i too felt the absence of the standard 6600 for comparisons sake to the X700 series. But... its not exactly the price/performance leader it was a few months ago. A vanilla 6600 is $99 at newegg... the DDR2 version is $117... and the 6600GT's in the $120-125 range. The performance of the 6600GT for only an extra twenty spot really makes it the best choice right now, and ive even seen 6600GT's drop as low as $105 AR. The performance of the DDR2 6600's is deffinitly stronger than the vanilla 6600, but not GT levels, and the price gap is too small to reccommend that purchase either.

    The 6600 is a solid card, to be sure, and its something worth keeping an eye on... but right now, the GT's are probably the better choice.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now