Final Words

The Acer Travelmate 8100 is certainly an impressive notebook. The combination of CPU speed, storage space, good display size and resolution, and the Mobility Radeon X700 make this notebook a very good performer in the mid-range mobile segment.

We are excited to see this part spar with the fairly recently announced GeForce Go 6600 line from NVIDIA. We will bring out a comparison as soon as we are able to round up the necessary competitor. It will be interesting to see whose designs are capable of greater performance when tighter thermal constraints are applied to the design. For now, the Go 6800 Ultra packs the harder punch in designs that we’ve seen where the TDP is ultra high and both systems are equipped with GDDR3. Scaling that down from the high end could tell quite a different story, especially since the MRX700 is fabbed on a .11 micron process.

As for this review, the MRX700 is clearly a solid part. Our tests do show that the mid-range mobile platform is still a couple of steps behind the desktop, and lower resolutions than 1280x1024 are preferred when gaming with the Acer Travelmate 8100.

We do prefer to see gaming possibilities at native panel resolutions, but with the nice sized panel in this machine, we can’t knock Acer’s decision. And on the upside, Half-Life 2 was playable at the highest resolution possible, which bodes well for future games based on the engine. For the smoothest experience, we do have to recommend gaming at resolutions with fewer pixels than 1280x1240. If the game in question supports 1152x720, that may be the sweet spot for this solution. Tweaking the settings for 128MB of RAM will also be necessary in some cases, but generally running with full image quality is possible.

We have been quite happy with the recent move of higher powered graphics to the mobile space, and the MRX700 is a worthy mid-range part in the current climate. Even just a year ago, something like this would have been the most that we could expect from high end mobile parts. The fact that we now see real mid-range parts translating directly into a mobile package is very exciting.

Performance at Other Resolutions
Comments Locked

14 Comments

View All Comments

  • Hikari - Wednesday, March 2, 2005 - link

    This is something like 2x as fast as the 9700 mobility, get real. It is pretty much the equivalent of a 9700 pro desktop part, however.
  • randomman - Tuesday, March 1, 2005 - link

    I realize that it would not be an exact comparison, but could you add some old benchies from the 9700 Mobility and 9800 M. This would give a better point of comparison than just against a desktop sys.
    Also are there any things available talking about the differences in power optimizations between the old 9700 and the X700?
  • Guspaz - Tuesday, March 1, 2005 - link

    Is there much point to the review of of a notebook graphics chip that has NO comparison to any other mobile graphics chips?

    Personally I find the benchmarks in this review totally useless.
  • Jep4444 - Tuesday, March 1, 2005 - link

    the big selling feature of this over the mobile 9700 is that it provides better battery life, it is also a more powerful chip than the mobile 9700
  • onix - Tuesday, March 1, 2005 - link

    How do we think graphics chip on this computer will compare to the Thinkpad T43p's ATI Mobility FIRE GL V3200 (128 MB)?
  • bobsmith1492 - Tuesday, March 1, 2005 - link

    Yeah, I play Doom 3 on medium, 1280x1024; runs pretty well. Same processor too; P-M, but with regular DDR, OCd to 2.125.
  • trikster2 - Tuesday, March 1, 2005 - link

    #6

    This is the same as the 9700 mobility????

    Blech.

    This is what we have been waiting for?

  • arfan - Tuesday, March 1, 2005 - link

    where is the pictures?
  • bobsmith1492 - Tuesday, March 1, 2005 - link

    So, basically this performs about the same as my 9700 mobility. Yay.
  • L3p3rM355i4h - Tuesday, March 1, 2005 - link

    ho hum...how much does this thing weigh? Surely not as much as that brick XPS.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now