GPU Performance

While general performance on the OnePlus 2 ends up being quite disappointing, when focusing on GPU performance we can hope for a much more appealing outcome as Adreno 430 continues to be one of the best GPUs you can get in a mobile device. While I don't expect there to be a large deviation from the performance of other Snapdragon 810 devices, given the unexpected difference with JavaScript and general CPU performance it's worth running the OnePlus 2 through our standard GPU benchmarks to confirm that everything is performing as expected. As always, we start off with 3DMark, followed by BaseMark X and GFXBench.

3DMark 1.2 Unlimited - Graphics

3DMark 1.2 Unlimited - Physics

3DMark 1.2 Unlimited - Overall

Snapdragon 810's Adreno 430 GPU is still very fast, and it achieves a very high score in 3DMark's graphics test. As usual, the physics test score basically just scales with frequency and number of cores in use, and with the big cores on the SoC throttling down we see a fairly low result there. I don't usually care much for the overall score, but since it's a weighted average we see the OnePlus 2 sitting near the Nexus 6, although in workloads that mainly stress the GPU you'll actually see a much larger gap between the two.

BaseMark X 1.1 - Dunes (High Quality, Onscreen)

BaseMark X 1.1 - Hangar (High Quality, Onscreen)

BaseMark X 1.1 - Dunes (High Quality, Offscreen)

BaseMark X 1.1 - Hangar (High Quality, Offscreen)

BaseMark X 1.1 - Overall (High Quality)

The OnePlus 2 performs very well in BaseMark X, tracking slightly behind the Mi Note Pro which we previously noted may have some level of additional optimizations at the driver level compared to the other Snapdragon 810 implementations. The improvement over the OnePlus One with its Adreno 330 GPU is quite large, with there being nearly a doubling in performance in the Hangar benchmark.

GFXBench 3.0 T-Rex HD (Onscreen)

GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan (Onscreen)

GFXBench 3.0 T-Rex HD (Offscreen)

GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan (Offscreen)

GFXBench's off screen performance results show that the OnePlus 2 is again a bit slower than the Mi Note Pro. In any case the performance is still very good and only really beaten by Samsung's Exynos 7420 devices, and the iPhone 6s. Since the display resolution is only 1080p you actually get better performance in games that run at native resolution than the Mi Note Pro and Galaxy Note5.

Adreno 430 has always been a good GPU, and in general the GPU performance of Snapdragon 808 and 810 hasn't really suffered in the same way the CPU performance has. At $400 the OnePlus 2 definitely gives you a lot of GPU power, and it's something that differentiates it from what's available at lower prices, and even other devices at the same price like the Nexus 5X.

NAND Performance

NAND performance is becoming a greater focus in mobile devices. To improve performance, vendors like Samsung and Apple have turned to solutions outside of the eMMC storage that is typically used in mobile devices. However, the vast majority of products still use eMMC NAND, and in some cases the performance of that NAND can be low enough to introduce noticeable performance issues when using a device. The OnePlus Two uses a Samsung CGND3R eMMC 5.0 NAND solution, which is the same as the one used in the Mi Note Pro.

Internal NAND - Random Read

Internal NAND - Random Write

Random read speeds track closely with the Mi Note Pro. Random writes end up being quite a bit slower, and this occurs even with repeated tests so I'm not sure exactly what's causing it.

Internal NAND - Sequential Read

Internal NAND - Sequential Write

As expected, sequential read and write speeds track almost exactly with the Mi Note Pro. While the results are nothing ground-breaking, they're in line with what you get from an eMMC 5.0 NAND solution. In most cases another component of the phone will likely end up limiting performance before one runs into issues due to NAND speeds, but you won't see some of the benefits that you get with extremely fast NAND such as extremely quick app installation times, faster media transfers, etc.

System Performance Battery Life, Charging, WiFi
Comments Locked

132 Comments

View All Comments

  • zeeBomb - Tuesday, December 15, 2015 - link

    Wow. Boeffla better than AK? Or both have their strengths & weaknesses...dunno why OP will just shutdown 2 A57s and render it as a 6 core device :/

    Does it get reaaaly hot on everyday usage too?
  • fguerro - Tuesday, December 15, 2015 - link

    I don't notice the phone getting significantly hotter with the changes in the Boeffla kernel.
  • fguerro - Monday, December 14, 2015 - link

    With my OnePlus 2 and custom kernel, running Chrome:

    Kraken 1.1 = 4419.8ms
    Google Octane = 8016
    WebXPRT 2015 = 118
  • MarcSP - Monday, December 14, 2015 - link

    Absolutely agree with you.
  • MarcSP - Monday, December 14, 2015 - link

    So you review "random" Android devices, but do not review the flagship device of the third mobile platform?
    And please don't say "2% marketshare worlwide". First, in many countries in Europe it has more than 10%, even more than iPhone. Second, products should be reviewed by relevance, not only marketshare. I think a flasgship phone for one of the major tech companies in the world, with the most used OS (in this case mobile version) is quite relevant.

    I am specially interested in the screen: some reviewers said "washed out" and others "very accurate colors". I assume the first group are the ones that like TV sets in the store, with over the top colors and contrast, but I would prefer to see Anandtech numbers to make sure :).
  • Brandon Chester - Monday, December 14, 2015 - link

    Microsoft and their PR agencies have not found a way to send a non-AT&T branded and locked unit to Brett. Might be worth petitioning them to figure that situation out.
  • Vishalaestro - Monday, December 14, 2015 - link

    you guys need to review the Asus zenfone 2 laser for the fact that how important the ISP is for camera performance , the camera is night and day better than the Asus zenfone 2 with the intel chipsets.
  • zeeBomb - Tuesday, December 15, 2015 - link

    Honestly its just a lot faster to snap, and yeah images are marginally better.
  • LiverpoolFC5903 - Tuesday, December 15, 2015 - link

    Quick question from a n00b. I thought the 4 A57 cores are synchronous, as in all four run at the same frequency when active or none at all. Same with the A53 cluster to my knowledge. But your statement about two A57 cores running with two of them shut sort of contradicts that.

    I also use Treqn profiler app from Qualcom to study CPU performance for different workloads and I have noticed that all four A57 cores show the same frequency curve when mapping CPU use in a graph.

    Anyone?

    So how does it work?

    "For example, in this case the Cortex A57 cores are in use during the web test, while in general they never get used at all during web browsing, and in more intensive situations the best case is that there are two A57 cores in use at some frequency and the other two are shut off."
  • Andrei Frumusanu - Tuesday, December 15, 2015 - link

    Frequency is independent from power states, cores can be shut off or power gated in idle even if the cluster frequency is high.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now