Crimson Performance

Last but certainly not least, let’s talk about performance improvements. Like the Omega driver before it, Crimson comes with a collection of performance improvements from AMD’s new driver branch. To preface this with caution, I don’t think anyone should be expecting massive system-wide performance gains – that’s all low-hanging fruit AMD picked long ago – but there’s plenty of room for some lesser optimizations along with game-specific optimizations.

AMD’s own numbers point to game-specific improvements of up to 20%, though it should be noted that AMD’s best-case numbers are on unreleased/beta games that have yet to be well-optimized in the first place. Otherwise AMD’s own numbers are far more tame, listing recently released games with gains between three and five percent.

To take a quick look at general performance, we went ahead and ran our GPU benchmark suite at 2560x1440 on our Radeon R9 Fury (vanilla), comparing the previous Catalyst 15.11.1 beta to the new Radeon Software Crimson 15.11 beta. The Fury and its underlying Fiji GPU is the newest product out of AMD, so it offers AMD the best opportunity to unlock any remaining performance in the architecture.

Radeon R9 Fury Driver Performance: Crimson 15.11 vs. Catalyst 15.11.1

Overall the average performance gain at 2560x1440 is just 1%. There are a couple of instances where there are small-but-consistent performance gains – Grand Theft Auto V and Grid: Autosport stand out here – but otherwise the performance in our other games is within the margin of error, plus or minus. Not that we were expecting anything different as this never was pitched as a golden driver,  but this does make it clear that more significant performance gains are going be on a per-game basis.

Final Thoughts

Wrapping things up, AMD’s development structure in the past year and going forward is one that has both been beneficial to the company and has brought with it its own drawbacks. By focusing feature releases around the end of the year driver, AMD is able to cut down on what parts of the driver they change (and thereby can possibly break) at other times of the year, and try to knock out all of their feature-related bugs at once. At the same time it makes the annual driver release a significant event, as AMD releases a number of new features all at once. However on the other hand this means that AMD has few features launching any other time of the year, which can make it look like they’re not heavily invested in feature development at those points. Then of course there’s the WHQL element, where for multiple reasons AMD hasn’t issued very many WHQL releases this year, and is something they’re seeking to change in 2016.

Looking under the hood there’s no single feature that’s going to blow every Radeon user away at once, but overall there are a number of neat features here that should be welcomed by various user groups. The Freesync Low Framerate Compensation changes should be of particular interest to Freesync users, while shader caching will improve shader loading performance across the board. Otherwise smaller fixes like the DirectX 9 improvements to CrossFire frame pacing, CrossFire Freesync, and framerate target control should be welcome news to APU and dual graphics users.

Meanwhile AMD’s radical overhaul of their control panel via the new Radeon Settings application will be quickly noticed by everyone. Though there’s plenty of room for interpretation on style and just how a good control panel is laid out, AMD has clearly put a lot of effort into cleaning up the layout of their control panel and it shows, as important options are no longer buried under multiple layers of menu trees. And on the performance front Radeon Settings is faster than Catalyst Control Center even on fast machines, and though we haven’t spent much time on covering it, AMD has also managed to speed up the installation process while they were at it. So all-told the Crimson release has something for everyone.

Ultimately I hesitate to ascribe too much of this to the Radeon Technologies Group too soon – this project has clearly been in the works longer than 3 months – but at the same time this is the RTG making their mark. It’s a new direction for AMD’s graphics group and a new look to match. And if the RTG can meet their stability, performance, and release goals going forward with the new Crimson driver, then they should be able to make 2016 a good year for the Radeon user base.

Radeon Settings: The New Face of AMD’s Drivers
Comments Locked

146 Comments

View All Comments

  • Dalamar6 - Thursday, November 26, 2015 - link

    Ironically: the new ui/driver is literally nothing more than a frontend for catalyst, which was renamed to "Radeon Additional Settings".
    And it loads slower than the old Catalyst Control Center.

    RIP AMD, only good at spinning PR.
  • mikato - Thursday, November 26, 2015 - link

    Wow that ad (on mobile) you have to scroll out of the way to continue reading is annoying as hell. Straight to comments for me. Later.
  • erple2 - Thursday, November 26, 2015 - link

    I've also noticed this trend, an upwards scrolling ad that scrolls a lot slower than my finger, until you realize that you can scroll the ad back to the bottom of the screen from whence it came.

    This annoying ad method isn't limited to Anandtech, though.
  • waltsmith - Thursday, November 26, 2015 - link

    Some pretty bold claims from Team RED about performance increases with this driver release. I've got 2 computers with crossfired 280x's (holdovers from coin mining craze) and a laptop with 960m graphics and am excited about future graphics from both companies. What I would like to see is some revisited benchmarks from AT with the new driver branch to see if any of these claims hold true, if they due, it would sure bring a lot more parity with Team GREEN.
  • Ikyuchi - Thursday, November 26, 2015 - link

    Nice review ... but it maybe nicer if it includes performance improvement test on games which is claimed by AMD have a major improvement (first figure on last page)
  • Ikyuchi - Sunday, November 29, 2015 - link

    nice review, but can you include performance test for selected game by AMD (first figure on last page) ? I really want to know the claim from AMD ...
  • tamalero - Thursday, December 3, 2015 - link

    I have no idea why my Crimson only detects like 10 games.. and only in the main hard disk.
    What did you do to make it detect the secondary hard disk games?
  • juliabrown943 - Thursday, December 3, 2015 - link

    what Jeffery said I am impressed that some one able to make $8960 in one month on the computer . you could try this out............................... .­­earni8­­­ dot ℭom
  • piiman - Saturday, December 5, 2015 - link

    Well they certainly made it harder to switch display profiles. I used to be able to assign hot keys to them but you can't now and instead have to open "settings ->preference-additional settings->presets and manually select the profile you want. There is no hot key or even a right click on the CCC menu option like before. Phhhffffffffftttttttttt! Who thought that was an improvement?
  • iamezza - Monday, December 7, 2015 - link

    I was just about to ask if anyone had figured out an easier way to switch profiles.
    I have been able to switch between eyefinity and regular mode for the last 5 years with either 2 clicks of the mouse or using hot keys.
    I can see that there is a profiles folder in the start menu too but it is empty.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now