Conclusion

The goal of our first fans review was to demonstrate the great performance difference that various fan designs can have and how these affect the selection of a fan for a specific application. It is also important to illustrate that merely the maximum static pressure and maximum airflow are not enough to represent the true performance of a fan, especially since both of these figures do not represent any real-world application scenario. Corsair's AF and SP series fans were ideal products for that purpose, as they are not "universal" models but each is designed for a specific application in mind.

Depending on the application, the selection of a fan can greatly affect performance. For example, if the fan is for a low impedance application (e.g. case fan without a filter), the AF140 would provide considerably more airflow than the SP140 and at a lower noise level. Similarly, the AF120 Performance Edition would provide about the same level of air volume flow at a much lower speed and noise level. On the other hand, if the fan is to be installed on a thick radiator, the AF120 would not manage to push half the air through it in comparison with a SP120.

As for the quality and performance of Corsair's fans, we first have to clarify once more that the LED and standard AF and SP fan versions are significantly different. This can also be noticed from the specifications of the fans, as the LED versions appear to have notably inferior performance than their non-LED counterparts. There is a reason why the LED versions are retailing for less. A twin pack of the AF120 LED fan currently retails for $18.40, while the AF120 Quiet Edition Twin Pack retails for $26 and a single fan for $18.20. The standard AF120, SP120 and AF140 fans are of both superior quality and design, plus they are using more expensive engines. By no means the AF140 LED and the SP140 LED are bad fans, but they do not really stand out like the immense static pressure of the SP120 Performance Edition does. If the lighting effect is not a necessity, we would definitely recommend the standard black version of the appropriate fan.

Corsair's advanced hydraulic bearing engine design is not ground-breaking, but it is clever. What Corsair did was to take the very widely used sleeve bearing design and improve it to match the reliability of a high end product. Sleeve bearings are known to generate comparatively low noise, especially when compared to ball bearings, but their lack of lubrication gives them relatively short lives. What Corsair did was to take a sleeve bearing and literally immersed it inside a tank of lubricant, alongside the axle of the engine itself. The lubricant ensures that the bearing will remain lubricated for life and also reduces friction and noise even further. That is where the name of this bearing design, "hydraulic", comes from. On paper, Corsair's hydraulic fan bearing can even outlast common ball bearing designs.

As for the engines of the LED fan versions, they might not have advanced hydraulic bearings as the rest of the series, but the rifle bearing that they are using is also considered a very good compromise between quiet operation, longevity and performance. They are not as premium as the hydraulic and FDB bearings that Corsair is using in their better fans, but they are definitely superior to a basic sleeve bearing fan.

To summarize, Corsair's fan products generally are of high quality and offer great application-specific performance, with the standard versions being even better than the LED versions of the seemingly same fan series. The SP series offer good performance for high impedance applications, such as coolers and radiators, while the AF series are designed to perform optimally as unobstructed case fans. Whether the LED version, the Performance Edition or the Quiet Edition is the right choice, that depends solely on the user's preferences, wants and needs.

The Corsair AF120 and SP120 Performance
Comments Locked

92 Comments

View All Comments

  • Folterknecht - Wednesday, November 25, 2015 - link

    Where was the author rude in his reply? Direct maybe, rude no!

    And as far as I can see the author is from europe - maybe both of them misunderstood each other completly when it comes to the term for resistance/ impedance. I get the feeling that american and european schools/universities might be using different terms and methods to describe the same phenomenon, that wouldn't be first time (X-Rays vs "Röntgenstrahlung").

    And in general europeans are a little bit more direct and you re lucky that the author isnt from germany, we re often even more direct ;-)

    No reason to get all upset here imo.
  • ImSpartacus - Wednesday, November 25, 2015 - link

    As a reader for many many years, I'm admittedly a mega-fanboy of Anandtech and I've previously paraded them around as being nigh-perfect compared to other tech blogs in many areas - including their writers' attitudes with readers (which is often lacking as technical-minded people can often be).

    It really comes down to no longer being able to say almost-absurd comments like, "I've never seen a comment even remotely rude/insulting from an Anandtech writer" in good conscience. I like to think that if I'm going to act like a shameless fanboy around others, I have to be more than justified in doing so. I just can't do that anymore.

    I fully realize that I probably put Anandtech on an unrealistically high pedestal. They are good, but the site is ultimately run by human beings and that's probably ok.
  • Beany2013 - Thursday, November 26, 2015 - link

    If you want to get offended on someone else's behalf, Tumblr is thataway --->

    Although in all seriousness, I think you must have read that comment from an *entirely* different perspective to me; I thought it was two people familiar with the science discussing their different interpretations of terminology in a fairly chilled out way. I mean, if you think someone has got something completely wrong and are trying to explain it the way you understand it, it's hard to *not* come across as passive aggressive, but I'm not getting that vibe at all.
  • Kutark - Thursday, November 26, 2015 - link

    I'll just leave this here for you, since clearly you ran out...

    http://www.amazon.com/Playtex-Tampons-Multipack-Un...
  • Oxford Guy - Thursday, November 26, 2015 - link

    Save the sexism for 4chan where it can, at least, pose as wit.
  • Phreedom1 - Sunday, December 6, 2015 - link

    He wasn't rude in anyway. Man you are thin skinned. So many people these days getting upset over little or nothing.
  • KAlmquist - Wednesday, November 25, 2015 - link

    According to the Wikipedia article you link, "mechanical impedance" is the ratio of force to velocity in response to a harmonic force. It's analogous to electrical impedance. It follows that your use of the term "impedance" is incorrect for two reasons. First, you are measuring a constant airflow, not one that alternates directions. For "impedance" to be relevant, you would need a force that alternates directions, which would generate an alternating air flow. Second, air resistance is not proportional to air velocity, so there is no fixed ratio between the two. To talk about "impedance," you need a linear system.

    Your second link does show that your usage is not unique. But your usage doesn't seem to be correct.
  • jann5s - Thursday, November 26, 2015 - link

    +1
  • ninjaquick - Wednesday, November 25, 2015 - link

    Impedance is the capacity or nature of impeding. Which is to say prevent motion or flow or activity.

    Saying it is limited to Electrical Engineering is like saying Tomatoes are limited to Ketchup.
  • wolfemane - Wednesday, November 25, 2015 - link

    Why... What... What else would they be used for?????

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now