System Performance: GPU

While CPU performance characterizes one part of an SoC, GPU performance characterizes another. Tablets have long been a form factor where GPU performance can be pushed much further than in a phone due to the larger chassis of a tablet having far fewer size and thermal limitations. While some tablets elect to use specialized SoCs with more powerful GPU hardware than smartphones, the Tab S2 uses the same ARM Mali T760 GPU used in the Galaxy Note 4 Exynos.

To characterize the Tab S2's GPU performance I've run it through our standard GPU benchmarks. First up is 3DMark which actually has both a CPU and GPU component, followed by BaseMark X and GFXBench which focus more strongly on the GPU alone.

3DMark 1.2 Unlimited - Physics

3DMark 1.2 Unlimited - Graphics

3DMark 1.2 Unlimited - Overall

In 3DMark all of the Tab S2's scores are roughly equivalent to the Galaxy Note 4 Exynos which is not unexpected. Unfortunately, it's clear that Mali T760 can't keep up with NVIDIA's mobile Kepler implementation or Apple's custom 8 core PowerVR 6XT part. While the Nexus 9 and iPad Air 2 both fall short in the physics sub test their scores in the graphics sub test are in a completely different league than the Tab S2.

BaseMark X 1.1 - Dunes (High Quality, Onscreen)

BaseMark X 1.1 - Hangar (High Quality, Onscreen)

BaseMark X 1.1 - Dunes (High Quality, Offscreen)

BaseMark X 1.1 - Hangar (High Quality, Offscreen)

In BaseMark X we again see the Tab S2 sitting fairly far behind the iPad Air 2 and Nexus 9. If I was considering the Tab S2 8.0 which retails for $399 these results would be perfectly fine, as the major competition at that price point is the iPad Mini 4 which has Apple A8 SoC. At $499 the GPU performance simply isn't competitive, and it outlines the issues with trying to make one SoC fit many different devices.

GFXBench 3.0 T-Rex HD (Onscreen)

GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan (Onscreen)

GFXBench 3.0 T-Rex HD (Offscreen)

GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan (Offscreen)

In GFXBench the Tab S2 is in the same situation as the previous tests. GPU performance is right around where the Galaxy Note 4 and iPhone 6 are, and it's just not good enough to justify the $499 price tag of the Tab S2.

Like I said on the last page, the fact that most Android tablet OEMs aren't providing CPU and GPU performance that is anywhere near competitive with the iPad Air 2 is a very bad thing for the entire tablet industry. Apple decided to not even update the iPad Air 2 despite it being a year old, and it's hard to blame them when nobody is close to them as far as performance is concerned. Having various manufacturers pushing each other to constantly improve is one of the primary drivers behind the advancements made in the mobile space, and I'm concerned that this no longer exists in the tablet market as the only tablets that come close are ones with NVIDIA's SoCs which also happen to be tablets that don't ship in very great volume.

System Performance: NAND

While it's still not advertised in specifications like on laptops, a mobile device's internal storage is now being recognized as a highly relevant part of overall system performance. Internal eMMC NAND solutions have traditionally had very poor storage performance, and different vendors have done different things to address the problem.

Internal NAND - Random Read

Internal NAND - Random Write

Internal NAND - Sequential Read

Internal NAND - Sequential Write

Both sets of read and write results are right around what you'd expect. Random writes in particular are very fast, and all the other results are fairly similar to those of the Galaxy Note 5. I don't expect internal NAND speeds will be a bottleneck on the Galaxy Tab S2, which is expected and fitting of a flagship tablet.

System Performance Display Analysis
Comments Locked

162 Comments

View All Comments

  • minimalz - Thursday, October 15, 2015 - link

    I had both the Air 2 and 9.7 S2 for a few days. I do a lot of reading and iPad Air 2 screen looks way better for that purpose. Easy on the eyes and sharp. The 9.7 S2 didn't feel as comfortable and the weird pink/purple tint color shift on white backgrounds was a deal breaker, too distracting. Although if I was just using it to consume media, I probably would have kept it. Strange the reviewer didn't notice this, I went to several bestbuy's and they all have the same tint issue.
  • DigitalFreak - Thursday, October 15, 2015 - link

    LOL @ everyone trying to justify their tablet purchase to other people. If it works for you, who cares what someone else thinks.
  • nerd1 - Thursday, October 15, 2015 - link

    I don't get the negatives. Tablet is a media consumption device, and they have frigging AMOLED screen with infinite contrast and now daylight visibility as well. Yes AP is slower but who cares? It feels snappy, has enough ram to not refresh like crazy during web surfing, and looks awesome. And nothing beats a good micro SD card slot for media consumption.

    And this tablet is considerably thinner and lighter than even ipad air, actually 9.7" model is almost as light as iPad mini and 8" model is approaching the weight of iPhone 6s+ (192gr vs 250gr, AFAIK) which matters a lot for e-book usage.
  • Brandon Chester - Thursday, October 15, 2015 - link

    The idea that a tablet can only be a media consumption device is quite a narrow view. But even if that was true, are games not a form of media? The Tab S2 isn't going to play 3D games with anywhere near the same frame rate or level of visual fidelity as the Air 2.
  • nerd1 - Thursday, October 15, 2015 - link

    Why is it a narrow view? I need proper keyboard, pointing device and full OS to get anything done in efficiency. I need powerful GPU and good input methods to play the latest games. I have a laptop with powerful CPU, GPU, lots of storage for exactly that purpose.

    3D gaming in tablet? Seriously? You can get older PC 3D games for a few bucks, and that is magnitude better than any games on tablet. Oh and they don't have in-app purchase either.
  • lilmoe - Thursday, October 15, 2015 - link

    +1
  • Brandon Chester - Thursday, October 15, 2015 - link

    The number of self references in your comment demonstrates exactly why it's a narrow view. Your requirements to complete a given task do not apply to every other person.
  • osxandwindows - Thursday, October 15, 2015 - link

    @nerd1
    that battery life tho
  • GMR73 - Thursday, October 15, 2015 - link

    Good review as always. One point though, on your intro page you have the Exynos 5420 as a Cortex-A53 instead of A7
  • nirolf - Thursday, October 15, 2015 - link

    Why would I get this when the original Air is cheaper and pretty much better in any way?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now