System Performance: GPU

While CPU performance characterizes one part of an SoC, GPU performance characterizes another. Tablets have long been a form factor where GPU performance can be pushed much further than in a phone due to the larger chassis of a tablet having far fewer size and thermal limitations. While some tablets elect to use specialized SoCs with more powerful GPU hardware than smartphones, the Tab S2 uses the same ARM Mali T760 GPU used in the Galaxy Note 4 Exynos.

To characterize the Tab S2's GPU performance I've run it through our standard GPU benchmarks. First up is 3DMark which actually has both a CPU and GPU component, followed by BaseMark X and GFXBench which focus more strongly on the GPU alone.

3DMark 1.2 Unlimited - Physics

3DMark 1.2 Unlimited - Graphics

3DMark 1.2 Unlimited - Overall

In 3DMark all of the Tab S2's scores are roughly equivalent to the Galaxy Note 4 Exynos which is not unexpected. Unfortunately, it's clear that Mali T760 can't keep up with NVIDIA's mobile Kepler implementation or Apple's custom 8 core PowerVR 6XT part. While the Nexus 9 and iPad Air 2 both fall short in the physics sub test their scores in the graphics sub test are in a completely different league than the Tab S2.

BaseMark X 1.1 - Dunes (High Quality, Onscreen)

BaseMark X 1.1 - Hangar (High Quality, Onscreen)

BaseMark X 1.1 - Dunes (High Quality, Offscreen)

BaseMark X 1.1 - Hangar (High Quality, Offscreen)

In BaseMark X we again see the Tab S2 sitting fairly far behind the iPad Air 2 and Nexus 9. If I was considering the Tab S2 8.0 which retails for $399 these results would be perfectly fine, as the major competition at that price point is the iPad Mini 4 which has Apple A8 SoC. At $499 the GPU performance simply isn't competitive, and it outlines the issues with trying to make one SoC fit many different devices.

GFXBench 3.0 T-Rex HD (Onscreen)

GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan (Onscreen)

GFXBench 3.0 T-Rex HD (Offscreen)

GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan (Offscreen)

In GFXBench the Tab S2 is in the same situation as the previous tests. GPU performance is right around where the Galaxy Note 4 and iPhone 6 are, and it's just not good enough to justify the $499 price tag of the Tab S2.

Like I said on the last page, the fact that most Android tablet OEMs aren't providing CPU and GPU performance that is anywhere near competitive with the iPad Air 2 is a very bad thing for the entire tablet industry. Apple decided to not even update the iPad Air 2 despite it being a year old, and it's hard to blame them when nobody is close to them as far as performance is concerned. Having various manufacturers pushing each other to constantly improve is one of the primary drivers behind the advancements made in the mobile space, and I'm concerned that this no longer exists in the tablet market as the only tablets that come close are ones with NVIDIA's SoCs which also happen to be tablets that don't ship in very great volume.

System Performance: NAND

While it's still not advertised in specifications like on laptops, a mobile device's internal storage is now being recognized as a highly relevant part of overall system performance. Internal eMMC NAND solutions have traditionally had very poor storage performance, and different vendors have done different things to address the problem.

Internal NAND - Random Read

Internal NAND - Random Write

Internal NAND - Sequential Read

Internal NAND - Sequential Write

Both sets of read and write results are right around what you'd expect. Random writes in particular are very fast, and all the other results are fairly similar to those of the Galaxy Note 5. I don't expect internal NAND speeds will be a bottleneck on the Galaxy Tab S2, which is expected and fitting of a flagship tablet.

System Performance Display Analysis
Comments Locked

162 Comments

View All Comments

  • steven75 - Thursday, October 15, 2015 - link

    Maybe if you have an irrational hatred of Apple and Samsung because does a LOT of marketing. They spend more than almost anyone, including Apple.
  • R. Hunt - Thursday, October 15, 2015 - link

    Amoled, expandable storage, and.or you prefer Android over iOS. Not saying you in particular may care about those, but some of us do.
  • osxandwindows - Thursday, October 15, 2015 - link

    @R. Hont
    If I wanted that I wood rather get a nexus 9.
  • R. Hunt - Friday, October 16, 2015 - link

    The Nexus 9 does not have Amoled nor expandable storage. It has a pitiful stock phone UI though.
  • osxandwindows - Thursday, October 15, 2015 - link

    u*
  • nerd1 - Thursday, October 15, 2015 - link

    DIsplay, storage, better file system, better screen usage (widgets). I don't understand why one chooses tablet without memory slot at all.
  • Tech_guy - Thursday, October 15, 2015 - link

    Because it doesn't matter if you have blazing fast 64 or 128gb nand storage.
  • osxandwindows - Thursday, October 15, 2015 - link

    @nerd1
    Most people buy 64 or 128gb.
  • nerd1 - Saturday, October 17, 2015 - link

    Considering 64gb sdxc costs as little as $20 now, that greatly separates the actual prices between two devices, which is totally ignored in this article.
  • Midwayman - Thursday, October 15, 2015 - link

    The Air 2 isn't sold as a 32gb model as mentioned in the final words. Its 16/64/128

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now