Final Words

Testing of Samsung's 950 Pro revealed some curiosities. Nevetheless, even when showing symptoms of possible thermal throttling, the 512GB sustained respectable performance and in tests that were representative of interactive use it performed extremely well. Users waiting on a full range of Skylake systems to come to the market may need a PCIe to M.2 adapter in order to put the drive in a slot that provides four lanes at PCIe 3.0 speed, but with the added benefit that such adapters can be bought with heatsinks to reduce the chance of triggering thermal throttling.

It's hard to judge pricing when there are limited options in this market segment. The Intel SSD 750 clearly needs to come down in price to be completely sidelined by the 950 Pro. Comparing against SATA drives, the 950 Pro's impressively high scores seem to make a good case for its price premium, but consider how often a particular use case will actually be able to take advantage of the peak speeds offered, which makes the 950 Pro a more prosumer oriented product. The 950 Pro isn't for everyone, and if cost is a sensitive issue then the 950 Pro should be weighed against Samsung's other offerings. But simply for a top of the line drive, the 950 Pro is priced reasonably for enthusiasts.

As a sign of where the SSD market is going, the 950 Pro clearly shows that SSD performance can be improved. Before too long, "high-end SATA SSD" will be an oxymoron; it's time for the transition to PCIe! The transition to NVMe seems less urgent given what Samsung was able to do with the SM951 and XP941 using AHCI, especially due to compatibility and drivers at this time. The power management issues in particular will need to be taken care of before NVMe moves beyond the enthusiast segment, especially for mobile computing.

The PCIe 3.0 x4 interface certainly gives the drive plenty of headroom. And based on the performance of the 950 Pro, it's doubtful that an M.2 drive will be able to saturate the interface before running in to thermal limits while still remaining in the same form factor. Future drives in this area will probably have to implement aggressive power saving techniques in order to keep average temperatures low enough to accommodate bursts of activity. The 950 Pro and the PCIe ecosystem in general have a lot to improve upon here.

The M.2 form factor is also constraining drive capacities to a degree. The back side of the 950 Pro is empty so a 1TB model should be geometrically possible if not economical, but the extra NAND packages would be even more susceptible to thermal problems. Samsung is instead choosing to wait for their 256Gb third-generation V-NAND before offering a larger model of the 950 Pro.

So far, Intel is the only manufacturer that has produced an enthusiast drive using the U.2 connector to provide PCIe x4 to a 2.5" drives. U.2 support is far less common than M.2, but the next time Samsung wants to introduce a major performance boost, they may go for the 2.5" U.2 option. We have already seen U.2 connectors directly on a pair of ASUS motherboards announced this week, and a number of Skylake consumer motherboards will come with M.2 to U.2 adapters specifically for this purpose.

ATTO & AS-SSD
Comments Locked

142 Comments

View All Comments

  • ElBerryKM13 - Saturday, November 14, 2015 - link

    If you had $1000 to spend which one would you get? this 950 pro m.2 or intel 1.2TB m.2?
  • srieppo - Monday, December 21, 2015 - link

    Get two 950 in RAID 0. I'm currently running that and it's amazing. What you should put money on depends on your needs though. For gaming SSD is not very important. But I already run 6700k with fast memory and 980TI SLI so was a logical next step.

    1TB of superfast SSD is the last bit. HDD for storage, power options to shut the HDD down when idle (silent) and online backup for important data is the way I like...
  • mapesdhs - Monday, December 14, 2015 - link

    Typo on pp. 9, the word "duplicating" is shown twice, or was that a really late April Fool? :D
  • mapesdhs - Tuesday, December 15, 2015 - link

    Pondering whether to get a 950 Pro 256GB for a SkyLake laptop (MSI GE72 6QF). Despite the glowing benchmark results, it looks as if there would be little gain for real world usage compared to, say, an 850 EVO M.2 which is way cheaper (132 UKP for 500GB, vs. 147 UKP for 950 Pro 256GB), uses less power and thus would afford longer battery life. Edging towards the 850 EVO despite my nerdy addiction to speed...
  • Killerkicker2011 - Wednesday, December 30, 2015 - link

    Would the 950 pro work with my Macbook Pro Late 2013?
  • Quarysma - Saturday, January 16, 2016 - link

    I bought 950 pro but i having trouble rate. My system test results as follows:836 / 806 MB/s read/write.
    My system: Asus Z97m plus, 2*8 Corsair 2400 Mhz. i5-4690K, Corsair h110i, 1000W PSU.

    I wonder why I'm having problems ?

    Thanks for all...
  • robitlgnaz - Tuesday, February 2, 2016 - link

    I have Asus Z97 deluxe with m.2 slot, but supporting only x4 PCI 2.0 (instead of x4 PCi 3.0).
    So on my mobo and yours too this m.2 support only 1.0Gbit or 1.000MB.;(

    I think (and asking) that with PCIe adapter i and you can put that in x8 lanes of PCI 2.0 and get full spedd with that? I have only one graphics card so this is the only way, or?
  • Quarysma - Friday, February 26, 2016 - link

    Either we get PCI-e card or will switch to the DDR4 system. I moved to a DDR4 system.

    I'm ordered DDR4 system and waiting for the parts.
  • yury2808 - Tuesday, April 12, 2016 - link

    Beware! This drive (950 Pro / 512 GB) is terribly slow, if you set your disk to be "compressed" in Win7/10. I used it save my vmware space for years with other SSD drives (intel/samsung/ocz) and never had an issue.
    But yesterday, we got 2x nvme 950 pro and found, that speed is dropping almost immediately to ... 3 MB/s with huge latency.

    I don't know, how their firmware goes around benchmarks (which are all cool for 'incompressible' data) but for real life - this drive get a HUGE hit when OS compress data.

    ps. sure, I have plenty CPU for it, so it's not the case.
  • Redstorm - Saturday, April 23, 2016 - link

    Be aware the new Samsung NVMe driver 1.1 drops performance by about 10% across the board. They should update the article with new perf numbers as its giving a false impression ATM.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now