The Samsung 950 Pro PCIe SSD Review (256GB and 512GB)
by Billy Tallis on October 22, 2015 10:55 AM ESTRandom Write Performance
The random write test is confined to a 16GB portion of the drive, which is otherwise empty. This allows the drive to demonstrate much higher performance than on our performance consistency test that fills the drive. Tasks like installing software updates can modify a lot of files, but aren't hitting the entire disk. Random writes to the entire disk are usually found only in enterprise workloads such as large databases.
The 950 Pro's random write speeds aren't benefiting at all from the PCIe interface or the NVMe protocol, and are about 20% slower than the SM951. Since it's happening to both drives it probably isn't a thermal issue, so this may be the result of a firmware change. Still, the Intel SSD 750 is the only retail drive that significantly outperforms the tightly clustered competition.
The higher power consumption during the random write test is a problem, since it's not buying any extra performance.
 |
|||||||||
After increasing significantly from QD1 to QD2, performance and power drop slightly and stay flat for most of the rest of the test. At the very end, a slight drop in power for the 512GB and a more significant drop for the 256GB may indicate a change in what background processing is going on; the drive may be postponing some garbage collection during the onslaught of writes at the maximum queue depth, or it may be a coincidental case of the background processing catching up and throttling back near the end of the test.
Random Read Performance
Our random read performance test is conducted on a full drive and tests queue depths from 1 to 32. We focus primarily on the lower queue depths that are typical of interactive use, but also look at how the performance and power scales to more intensive loads. For desktop use, searching and virus scanning are typically the biggest sources of random reads, and they can exercise some of the larger queue depths.
The strong random read performance of the 950 Pro provides great justification for its status as the a flagship drive for the consumer market.
The 950 Pro's power consumption is moderately higher but nowhere close to being proprotional to the performance advantage; the 950 Pro doesn't have to run hot to offer great performance.
 |
|||||||||
Power and performance scaling look very typical here, except I had to expand the performance axis for the 950 Pro. Both drives pass SATA's limits at or before QD16.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
142 Comments
View All Comments
Per Hansson - Wednesday, October 28, 2015 - link
If you really need it FXi there is always the announced Samsung SM953 drive.It's 110mm long due to the inclusion of the tantalum capacitors, otherwise it's very similar to the SM951...
http://www.samsung.com/semiconductor/global/file/i...
R3MF - Sunday, October 25, 2015 - link
i was under the impression that win7 (install disk) does not support nvme, so i'm curious as to how you went about getting Win7 on a 950?Kristian Vättö - Sunday, October 25, 2015 - link
There is a hotfix NVMe driver available for Windows 7: https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/2990941blos - Monday, October 26, 2015 - link
I slipstreamed that hotfix (and almost 200 other fixes) using NTLite to a Win7SP1 image, wrote it back to usb, booted and it would still not allow me to install to a 951 NVMe drive... no drives found.Has anybody got this to work?
Windows 10 installs just fine but I have an unused W7 Pro license and I would really like to use it to active a W10 install.
I hear the next version of W10 will activate directly from W7 licenses... but hopefully that'll arrive in time before the W10 will really want the activation. Or perhaps re-arming to extend a bit?
Per Hansson - Wednesday, October 28, 2015 - link
Yes it works but you need to integrate it in boot.wim as well.I made some details here about it, also nothing an errors that MS is still to fix in that KB article.
Even though I reported it a long time ago:
http://www.overclock.net/t/1543242/found-samsung-s...
blos - Wednesday, October 28, 2015 - link
Ah that explains a lot, didn't know that the boot.wim was a different environment :)Quick search indicates that boot.wim integration is already available on the NTLite, so I guess it's playtime for this weekend :)
catavalon21 - Wednesday, October 28, 2015 - link
The test system doesn't have a discrete video card. Would a high-powered video card impact the performance of the M.2 PCIe setup?AnnonymousCoward - Wednesday, October 28, 2015 - link
No.Caramonn - Friday, October 30, 2015 - link
I've read the review and others and I guess I don't see a reason to get one of these drives yet. Am I missing something? It seems that the real world performance doesn't justify the nearly twice the cost as other Samsung SATA drives. I was really hoping that the rated speeds would translate into actual real world performance, but that doesn't appear to be the case.Tuishimi - Thursday, November 5, 2015 - link
$350... I could live with that. Sounds like a decent piece of hardware.