Random Write Performance

The random write test is confined to a 16GB portion of the drive, which is otherwise empty. This allows the drive to demonstrate much higher performance than on our performance consistency test that fills the drive. Tasks like installing software updates can modify a lot of files, but aren't hitting the entire disk. Random writes to the entire disk are usually found only in enterprise workloads such as large databases.

Iometer - 4KB Random Write

The 950 Pro's random write speeds aren't benefiting at all from the PCIe interface or the NVMe protocol, and are about 20% slower than the SM951. Since it's happening to both drives it probably isn't a thermal issue, so this may be the result of a firmware change. Still, the Intel SSD 750 is the only retail drive that significantly outperforms the tightly clustered competition.

Iometer - 4KB Random Write (Power)

The higher power consumption during the random write test is a problem, since it's not buying any extra performance.

Samsung 950 Pro 256GB

After increasing significantly from QD1 to QD2, performance and power drop slightly and stay flat for most of the rest of the test. At the very end, a slight drop in power for the 512GB and a more significant drop for the 256GB may indicate a change in what background processing is going on; the drive may be postponing some garbage collection during the onslaught of writes at the maximum queue depth, or it may be a coincidental case of the background processing catching up and throttling back near the end of the test.

Random Read Performance

Our random read performance test is conducted on a full drive and tests queue depths from 1 to 32. We focus primarily on the lower queue depths that are typical of interactive use, but also look at how the performance and power scales to more intensive loads. For desktop use, searching and virus scanning are typically the biggest sources of random reads, and they can exercise some of the larger queue depths.

Iometer - 4KB Random Read

The strong random read performance of the 950 Pro provides great justification for its status as the a flagship drive for the consumer market.

Iometer - 4KB Random Read (Power)

The 950 Pro's power consumption is moderately higher but nowhere close to being proprotional to the performance advantage; the 950 Pro doesn't have to run hot to offer great performance.

Samsung 950 Pro 256GB

Power and performance scaling look very typical here, except I had to expand the performance axis for the 950 Pro. Both drives pass SATA's limits at or before QD16.

AnandTech Storage Bench - Light Sequential Performance
Comments Locked

142 Comments

View All Comments

  • AnnonymousCoward - Thursday, October 22, 2015 - link

    This 5,600-word review utterly fails to penetrate to the bottom-line answer: the 950 Pro gives virtually zero desktop-usage performance advantage, while costing more than double of SATAIII drives. That only took 17 words.

    http://techreport.com/review/29221/samsung-950-pro...
  • Redstorm - Thursday, October 22, 2015 - link

    Quote: "Lucky for that Samsung 950 Pro SSD or i would never have made that head shot" - said no one ever.
  • PVG - Thursday, October 22, 2015 - link

    I don't want to believe you tested a PCIe 3.0 4x drive on a board with a PCIe 2.0 x2 M.2 socket, so I'm guessing you used some kind of PCIe card adapter hooked up to the 3.0 lanes from de CPU, right?
  • Billy Tallis - Friday, October 23, 2015 - link

    Yep. We're always using the PCIe lanes off the CPU, and with a riser card and adapter that allows for the power measurement.
  • PVG - Saturday, October 24, 2015 - link

    That sounds like a cool setup. You should show it, sometime. ;)
  • zodiacfml - Friday, October 23, 2015 - link

    I'm just impressed with the SM951. All these PCIe drives are not terrible and gives excellent performance over SATA anyway. Their differences are pretty negligible in real world use. The challenge now (esp. for Samsung) is more capacity and lower prices.

    I can't shake the idea of NAS devices with M.2 drives.
  • zodiacfml - Friday, October 23, 2015 - link

    Additionally, NVMe doesn't improve much for the clients. It seems like a specification they added on consumer drives to increase its adoption to benefit their server/enterprise storage products.
  • wyewye - Friday, October 23, 2015 - link

    Billy, you shit the bed: half of graphs are randomly missing Intel 750, the only competing consumer drive.

    However, good job on highlighting the termal issues of 950 Pro.
  • lilmoe - Saturday, October 24, 2015 - link

    Welcome to the world of amazingly consistent charts, brought to you by Anandtech.
  • SyukriLajin - Friday, October 23, 2015 - link

    who knew that storage would require bandwidth as high as a graphic card. just a few years ago, it's the slowest component of your computer.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now