The Samsung 950 Pro PCIe SSD Review (256GB and 512GB)
by Billy Tallis on October 22, 2015 10:55 AM ESTAnandTech Storage Bench - Heavy
Our Heavy storage benchmark is proportionately more write-heavy than The Destroyer, but much shorter overall. The total writes in the Heavy test aren't enough to fill the drive, so performance never drops down to the steady state. This test is far more representative of a power user's day to day usage, and is heavily influenced by the drive's peak performance. The Heavy workload test details can be found here.
Performance of the 950 Pro is comparable to the SM951, which is to say that it's significantly better than everything else we've tested. The penalty when starting with a fill drive is a bit larger than normal, but simply being full isn't enough to tank the performance the way a sustained test can.
Average service time and latency outliers are vastly better than any SATA drive, but NVMe doesn't seem to make a huge difference.
The high performance comes with the price of high power consumption, and the total energy used over the course of this test is significantly higher than all the high-performance SATA drives we're comparing against.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
142 Comments
View All Comments
AnnonymousCoward - Thursday, October 22, 2015 - link
This 5,600-word review utterly fails to penetrate to the bottom-line answer: the 950 Pro gives virtually zero desktop-usage performance advantage, while costing more than double of SATAIII drives. That only took 17 words.http://techreport.com/review/29221/samsung-950-pro...
Redstorm - Thursday, October 22, 2015 - link
Quote: "Lucky for that Samsung 950 Pro SSD or i would never have made that head shot" - said no one ever.PVG - Thursday, October 22, 2015 - link
I don't want to believe you tested a PCIe 3.0 4x drive on a board with a PCIe 2.0 x2 M.2 socket, so I'm guessing you used some kind of PCIe card adapter hooked up to the 3.0 lanes from de CPU, right?Billy Tallis - Friday, October 23, 2015 - link
Yep. We're always using the PCIe lanes off the CPU, and with a riser card and adapter that allows for the power measurement.PVG - Saturday, October 24, 2015 - link
That sounds like a cool setup. You should show it, sometime. ;)zodiacfml - Friday, October 23, 2015 - link
I'm just impressed with the SM951. All these PCIe drives are not terrible and gives excellent performance over SATA anyway. Their differences are pretty negligible in real world use. The challenge now (esp. for Samsung) is more capacity and lower prices.I can't shake the idea of NAS devices with M.2 drives.
zodiacfml - Friday, October 23, 2015 - link
Additionally, NVMe doesn't improve much for the clients. It seems like a specification they added on consumer drives to increase its adoption to benefit their server/enterprise storage products.wyewye - Friday, October 23, 2015 - link
Billy, you shit the bed: half of graphs are randomly missing Intel 750, the only competing consumer drive.However, good job on highlighting the termal issues of 950 Pro.
lilmoe - Saturday, October 24, 2015 - link
Welcome to the world of amazingly consistent charts, brought to you by Anandtech.SyukriLajin - Friday, October 23, 2015 - link
who knew that storage would require bandwidth as high as a graphic card. just a few years ago, it's the slowest component of your computer.