Final Words

The ECS LIVA Core provided us with the opportunity to evaluate Core M in a desktop PC configuration. Compact fanless PCs that can be VESA-mounted on the back of a display are understandably popular, and the LIVA class of products from ECS caters to this market segment as an alternative to the standard NUCs. With the addition of the LIVA Core, ECS has two different performance levels for customers to choose from. Within the same power envelop, we have the LIVA Core providing with tangible performance improvements compared to the LIVA X2. Obviously, there is a price premium associated with this performance increase. The presence of two HDMI outputs can also lead to some interesting use-cases.

In terms of scope for improvement, ECS could have gone for DRAM with better timings. For example, in our Zotac ZBOX CI540 nano review, we used DDR3L memory with 9-9-9-24 timing. The soldered memory in the LIVA Core is rated for 11-11-11-28. This definitely leaves some performance on the table (as we saw the CI540 nano perform as good or even better than the LIVA Core in a few benchmarks). On the I/O front, the microSD slot should definitely be replaced with a full-sized SDHC slot (one should note that microSD cards can be used in those with a passive adapter, but the reverse situation is not possible). Given the premium nature of the system, it would have been nice to have an Intel LAN chipset instead of the currently integrated Realtek LAN. We are also not very enthusiastic about the SandForce-based SSD choice. Consumers wishing to upgrade the SSD need to note that only M.2 2280 SSDs are supported. The thermal solution for the SSD also needs to be kept in mind, given its proximity to the WLAN component.

The thermal solution seems fine at first glance. It should allow for more than acceptable performance under normal client workloads. However, we believe the chassis design could be altered for better airflow and convective cooling. A design similar to that of the Zotac C-series nano units (with perforations all around, including the top) could help with this aspect.

ECS has plans for two SKUs in the NA market. The configuration we reviewed comes in at $453. Another SKU with the same hardware configuration, but a licensed pre-installed version of Windows 10 Home will come in at $553.

Coming to the business end of the review, it can be said that the ECS LIVA Core comes in a slick package with acceptable trade-offs. However, the premium pricing of the unit may be considered as a deterrent by many prospective customers. That said, one should note that passively cooled PCs with similar or better performance carry a larger premium. For example, the Haswell-Y-based Zotac ZBOX CI540 nano configuration that was used as a comparison point in many of the benchmarks comes in at $520.

Core M is a great fit for fanless 2-in-1s. However, in a desktop form factor, we believe consumers might be more attracted to the cheaper Braswell-based fanless PCs or opt to sacrifice the looks and form factor a bit, pay a premium and go for the fanless NUCs. It will be interesting to see the market reception for Core M-based fanless desktop PCs such as the ECS LIVA Core that occupy a price point in the middle.

Power Consumption and Thermal Performance
Comments Locked

35 Comments

View All Comments

  • Bob Todd - Wednesday, October 7, 2015 - link

    Mine is running Windows 10 but I'm not a Netflix user. Are you on the fast ring for updates?
  • Einy0 - Wednesday, October 7, 2015 - link

    My personal opinion is the cost is too high for most usage scenarios. The CPU is too costly and is bring the entire package down with it. This is a huge departure from the LIVA and LIVAx2 and their minimalist / low cost platform. If this had replaceable RAM as well I think it would have a chance. I can't see paying nearly $500 for this when you can get a whole Lenovo ThinkCentre M73 Tiny with Windows for the same price.
  • Kinematics - Wednesday, October 7, 2015 - link

    If it won't hardware accelerate HEVC and (particularly) HEVC 10 bit, what is its performance like when playing back those (as well as 10 bit h.264)? Seems a rather notable absence in the review.
  • Oxford Guy - Thursday, October 8, 2015 - link

    Because this unit shouldn't exist. Thank Intel for releasing 14nm parts with no H.265. LOL.
  • Shadowmaster625 - Wednesday, October 14, 2015 - link

    I remain unconvinced. For $150 more, you can add a screen, a battery (which is a very useful built-in UPS), and a Windows license. It's called a tablet. It seems like an absolute no brainer to go that route. I would velco one of those onto the back of a monitor before buying something like this.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now