Final Words

The ECS LIVA Core provided us with the opportunity to evaluate Core M in a desktop PC configuration. Compact fanless PCs that can be VESA-mounted on the back of a display are understandably popular, and the LIVA class of products from ECS caters to this market segment as an alternative to the standard NUCs. With the addition of the LIVA Core, ECS has two different performance levels for customers to choose from. Within the same power envelop, we have the LIVA Core providing with tangible performance improvements compared to the LIVA X2. Obviously, there is a price premium associated with this performance increase. The presence of two HDMI outputs can also lead to some interesting use-cases.

In terms of scope for improvement, ECS could have gone for DRAM with better timings. For example, in our Zotac ZBOX CI540 nano review, we used DDR3L memory with 9-9-9-24 timing. The soldered memory in the LIVA Core is rated for 11-11-11-28. This definitely leaves some performance on the table (as we saw the CI540 nano perform as good or even better than the LIVA Core in a few benchmarks). On the I/O front, the microSD slot should definitely be replaced with a full-sized SDHC slot (one should note that microSD cards can be used in those with a passive adapter, but the reverse situation is not possible). Given the premium nature of the system, it would have been nice to have an Intel LAN chipset instead of the currently integrated Realtek LAN. We are also not very enthusiastic about the SandForce-based SSD choice. Consumers wishing to upgrade the SSD need to note that only M.2 2280 SSDs are supported. The thermal solution for the SSD also needs to be kept in mind, given its proximity to the WLAN component.

The thermal solution seems fine at first glance. It should allow for more than acceptable performance under normal client workloads. However, we believe the chassis design could be altered for better airflow and convective cooling. A design similar to that of the Zotac C-series nano units (with perforations all around, including the top) could help with this aspect.

ECS has plans for two SKUs in the NA market. The configuration we reviewed comes in at $453. Another SKU with the same hardware configuration, but a licensed pre-installed version of Windows 10 Home will come in at $553.

Coming to the business end of the review, it can be said that the ECS LIVA Core comes in a slick package with acceptable trade-offs. However, the premium pricing of the unit may be considered as a deterrent by many prospective customers. That said, one should note that passively cooled PCs with similar or better performance carry a larger premium. For example, the Haswell-Y-based Zotac ZBOX CI540 nano configuration that was used as a comparison point in many of the benchmarks comes in at $520.

Core M is a great fit for fanless 2-in-1s. However, in a desktop form factor, we believe consumers might be more attracted to the cheaper Braswell-based fanless PCs or opt to sacrifice the looks and form factor a bit, pay a premium and go for the fanless NUCs. It will be interesting to see the market reception for Core M-based fanless desktop PCs such as the ECS LIVA Core that occupy a price point in the middle.

Power Consumption and Thermal Performance
Comments Locked

35 Comments

View All Comments

  • cjb110 - Thursday, October 8, 2015 - link

    It's probably a side effect of them being soldered on the board, they've counted 4 of chips, each being 8 gigabit. If it had used sticks, then I doubt they'd have been counted as such. Some GPU reviews have done the same.
  • GatesDA - Wednesday, October 7, 2015 - link

    It's weird, but the lower-case "b" matters. For some reason it's listed in gigabits, and 8 gigabits (Gb) = 1 gigabyte (GB).
  • mctylr - Wednesday, October 7, 2015 - link

    No, it's not weird if you are use to using SI (metric), where prefixes are case sensitive as well (i.e. Mega versus milli).
  • frenchy_2001 - Wednesday, October 7, 2015 - link

    And if you want to be pedantic, they are NOT using the right symbol either.
    It should be 4 x 8Gib = 4 GiB
    Gi = 2^30
    G = 10 ^9, SI notation

    http://wintelguy.com/gb2gib.html
  • mkozakewich - Thursday, October 8, 2015 - link

    Yeah, but that's stupid anyway. Only drive manufacturers use base-10 units. We should just call a billion byes "drive gigabytes" and leave the rest as regular GB.
  • piroroadkill - Thursday, October 8, 2015 - link

    Disagree, there are actual standards on this kind of thing.

    Drive units are using correct SI order of magnitude prefix notation, whereas RAM manufacturers are not, and most people do not use them correctly. Windows reports sizes incorrectly (using the traditional, incorrect method). OS X reports sizes using SI notation these days, correctly.
  • Vepsa - Wednesday, October 7, 2015 - link

    I think this would be great for a LSTP thin client.
  • bznotins - Wednesday, October 7, 2015 - link

    Feels like no hardware H.265 support is a deal-killer.

    Looking-forward to the lower-power Skylake CPUs for future streaming boxes.
  • nathanddrews - Thursday, October 8, 2015 - link

    That's my thought as well. Looking at it purely from a HTPC perspective, without HEVC support, it really offer very little over a much cheaper Atom-based Liva. As a generic workstation, you can't upgrade the RAM and the SSD upgrade path is very limited. It lacks a second gigabit port, so you can't make a router out of it either. For gaming, it's worthless unless you use it as a streamer, but then you can do that with much cheaper units as well. For $450-500, it's a terrible purchase no matter what your end goal is.

    Meh.
  • Oxford Guy - Thursday, October 8, 2015 - link

    "The only unfortunate aspect here is the complete absence of any sort of hardware acceleration for HEVC."

    It strikes me as particularly ridiculous that Intel has rolled out their 14nm parts with iGPUs that have no H.265. WEAK.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now